Skip to main content

Are We Ready for Take-Off ? Learning Cockpit Actions with VR Headsets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Extended Reality (XR Salento 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13445))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1269 Accesses

Abstract

Pilot training is crucial for learning and practicing operations and safety procedures. The sooner pilots become acquainted with flight deck instrumentation and actions, the faster, safer, and cost-effective the training. Active learning with pilot training includes searching tasks and memorization ability. These aspects then need to be incorporated into the flight simulator training. The use of virtual reality (VR) technologies can in principle take pilot training to the next level. VR technologies such as head-mounted displays can provide a higher sense of presence in the observed sceneries and a more natural interaction than traditional (non-immersive) display systems (e.g. 2D monitors). There is, however, some reluctance towards using immersive VR systems in aviation training and a lack of knowledge on its effectiveness, which results in slow take-up of VR solutions and the dominant use of 2D monitors. This paper aims to assess the performance advantage an immersive system such as a head-mounted display (HMD) brings to pilot training. The focus is on presence, search tasks and memorization. We experiment with actions of learning instrumentation and procedures in the cockpit. We run the same activities on both a HMD and 2D monitor. We gather data on users’ performance in terms of accuracy, the success of actions, completion time and memorization through objective measurements. We also acquire data on presence and comfort through subjective rating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lutte, B.: Pilot supply at the regional airlines: airline response to the changing environment and the impact on pilot hiring. J. Aviat. Educ. Res. 27, 1–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2018.1749

  2. Losey, S.: The Air Force is revolutionizing the way airmen learn to be aviators. https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/09/30/the-air-force-is-revolutionizing-the-way-airmen-learn-to-be-aviators/. Accessed 25 Apr 2022

  3. Walters, W.T., Walton, J.: Efficacy of virtual reality training for pilots: a review of links between user presence, search task performance, and collaboration within virtual reality. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 65, 919–922 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651347

  4. Pritchett, A.R., Nix, D.C., Ockerman, J.J.: Empirical evaluations of pilot planning behavior in emergency situations. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 45, 6–10 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104500201

  5. Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 603–616 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dymora, P., Kowal, B., Mazurek, M., Romana, S.: The effects of virtual reality technology application in the aircraft pilot training process. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1024, 012099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1024/1/012099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hight, M., Fussell, S., Kurkchubasche, M., Hummell, I.: Effectiveness of virtual reality simulations for civilian, Ab Initio pilot training. J. Aviat. Educ. Res. 31, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2022.1903

  8. The Air Force’s Virtual Reality Fighter Training Is Working Best for 5th-Gen Pilots | Military.com. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/03/26/air-forces-virtual-reality-fighter-training-working-best-5th-gen-pilots.html. Accessed 25 Apr 2022

  9. US Air Force trials virtual reality for crew chief course - Airforce Technology. https://www.airforce-technology.com/analysis/us-air-force-trials-virtual-reality-for-crew-chief-course/. Accessed 25 Apr 2022

  10. Are VR flight simulators the future of pilot training? https://www.aircharterservice.com/about-us/news-features/blog/are-vr-flight-simulators-the-future-of-pilot-training. Accessed 25 Apr 2022

  11. Jaakola, M.: Current Virtual Reality Solutions and Possibilities for Training Within Aviation 58

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson, N., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S.: Immersion revisited: a review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Hum. Technol. 12, 108–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201611174652

  13. Baceviciute, S., Cordoba, A.L., Wismer, P., Jensen, T.V., Klausen, M., Makransky, G.: Investigating the value of immersive virtual reality tools for organizational training: an applied international study in the biotech industry. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38, 470–487 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nash, E., Edwards, G., Thompson, J., Barfield, W.: A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 12, 1–41 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1201_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emami, Z., Chau, T.: The effects of visual distractors on cognitive load in a motor imagery brain-computer interface. Behav. Brain Res. 378, 112240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olk, B., Dinu, A., Zielinski, D.J., Kopper, R.: Measuring visual search and distraction in immersive virtual reality. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 172331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172331

  17. Marquardt, A., Trepkowski, C., Eibich, T.D., Maiero, J., Kruijff, E., Schöning, J.: Comparing non-visual and visual guidance methods for narrow field of view augmented reality displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26, 3389–3401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lleras, A., Wang, Z., Madison, A., Buetti, S.: Predicting search performance in heterogeneous scenes: quantifying the impact of homogeneity effects in efficient search. Collabra Psychol. 5, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Makransky, G., Petersen, G.B.: The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): a theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33(3), 937–958 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., Varshney, A.: Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Real. 23(1), 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H.: Let the reader decide: a paradigm shift for situation awareness in sociotechnical systems. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 9, 44–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343414552297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. JohnsonGlenberg, M.C., Bartolomea, H., Kalina, E.: Platform is not destiny: embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality STEM experiences. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37, 1263–1284 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, N., Milella, F., Pinto, C., Cant, I., White, M., Meyer, G.: The effects of substitute multisensory feedback on task performance and the sense of presence in a virtual reality environment. PLoS ONE 13, e0191846 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Livatino, S., et al.: Stereoscopic visualization and 3-D technologies in medical endoscopic teleoperation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62, 525–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2334675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pomplun, M., Garaas, T.W., Carrasco, M.: The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays. J. Vis. 13, 24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallet, G., Sauzéon, H., Pala, P., Florian, L., Zheng, X., Bernard, N.: Virtual/real transfer of spatial knowledge: benefit from visual fidelity provided in a virtual environment and impact of active navigation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 417–423 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Livatino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Livatino, S. et al. (2022). Are We Ready for Take-Off ? Learning Cockpit Actions with VR Headsets. In: De Paolis, L.T., Arpaia, P., Sacco, M. (eds) Extended Reality. XR Salento 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13445. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15546-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15546-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics