Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Ambidexterity, Adaptive Transformation Capability, and Their Impact on Performance Under Tumultuous Times

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13454))

Abstract

Over the past two years, scholars have increasingly paid attention to firms’ capability to adapt to their increasingly turbulent business ecosystem environments. This study embraces the dynamic capabilities theory, uses ideas from the accelerated corporate transformation, and posits that adaptive transformation capability, driven by ambidextrous artificial intelligence (AI) use, i.e., routine and innovative use in practice, serves as a mechanism for firms to gain superior organizational performance under COVID-19. Using a composite-based structural equation model (SEM) approach, we use survey data from 257 C-level practitioners with key decision-making roles and experience in AI and digital transformation initiatives. We used this data to analyze the theorized relationships. Outcomes show that the ambidextrous use of AI positively enhances a firm’s adaptive transformation capability. This capability, in turn, fully mediates the impact of AI ambidexterity on competitive performance during COVID-19. These outcomes have important theoretical and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 06 September 2022

    The last name “Mikalef” of the chapter author “Patrick Mikalef” name was unfortunately published with a typo error. The initially published version has now been corrected.

References

  1. Wang, C.L., Ahmed, P.K.: Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 31–51 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, K.Z., Li, C.B.: How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. J. Bus. Res. 63(3), 224–231 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport, T.H.: From analytics to artificial intelligence. J. Bus. Anal. 1(2), 73–80 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brynjolfsson, E., Mcafee, A.: Artificial intelligence, for real. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1, 1–31 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, R., Roberts, G., Beber, G. (eds.): Parsing the turing test. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Brock, J.K.-U., Von Wangenheim, F.: Demystifying AI: what digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61(4), 110–134 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Makowski, P.T., Kajikawa, Y.: Automation-driven innovation management? toward innovation-automation-strategy cycle. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 168, 120723 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarrahi, M.H.: Artificial intelligence and the future of work: human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Bus. Horiz. 61(4), 577–586 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barot, S., Agarwal, S., Antelmi, J.: Planning guide for analytics and artificial intelligence. In: Gartner. Gartner (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mikalef, P., Gupta, M.: Artificial intelligence capability: conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Inform. Manage. 58(3), 103434 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport, T.H., Ronanki, R.: Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harv. Bus. Rev. 96(1), 108–116 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canhoto, A.I., Clear, F.: Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: a framework for diagnosing value destruction potential. Bus. Horiz. 63(2), 183–193 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Press, G.: AI stats news: 34% of employees expect their jobs to be automated in 3 years. In: Forbes (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Wamba, S.F., Kamdjoug, J.R.K., Wanko, C.E.T.: Impact of artificial intelligence on firm performance: exploring the mediating effect of process-oriented dynamic capabilities. In: Agrifoglio, R., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D., Ricciardi, F. (eds.) Digital Business Transformation. LNISO, vol. 38, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., Gassmann, O.: Artificial intelligence and innovation management: a review, framework, and research agenda✰. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 162, 120392 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dwivedi, Y.K., et al.: Artificial Intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 57, 101994 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van de Wetering, R., Hendrickx, T., Brinkkemper, S., Kurnia, S.: The impact of EA-driven dynamic capabilities, innovativeness, and structure on organizational benefits: a variance and fsQCA perspective. Sustainability 13(10), 5414 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Majhi, S.G., Mukherjee, A., Anand, A.: Business value of cognitive analytics technology: a dynamic capabilities perspective. VINE J. Inform. Knowl. Manag. Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0128

  19. Wetering, R.: Achieving digital-driven patient agility in the era of big data. In: Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y.K., Pappas, I., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2021. LNCS, vol. 12896, pp. 82–93. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Eshima, Y., Anderson, B.S.: Firm growth, adaptive capability, and entrepreneurial orientation. Strateg. Manag. J. 38(3), 770–779 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J.: Antecedents and contingent effects of organizational adaptive capability on firm product innovativeness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 29, 171–189 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiwoho, G., Suroso, A., Wulandari, S.: Linking adaptive capability, product innovation and marketing performance: results from Indonesian SMEs. Manag. Sci. Lett. 10(10), 2379–2384 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van de Wetering, R.: The impact of artificial intelligence ambidexterity and strategic flexibility on operational ambidexterity. In: 2022 Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Taipei/Sydney Virtual Conference (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, O.-K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K.H., Wei, K.K.: How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Inf. Syst. Res. 26(2), 398–417 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van de Wetering, R.: IT ambidexterity and patient agility: the mediating role of digital dynamic capability. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AIS, Virtual Conference (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, N., Liang, H., Zhong, W., Xue, Y., Xiao, J.: Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study of the business value of information technology. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 325–367 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seddon, P.B.: Implications for strategic IS research of the resource-based theory of the firm: a reflection. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(4), 257–269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van de Wetering, R., Versendaal, J., Walraven, P.: Examining the relationship between a hospital’s IT infrastructure capability and digital capabilities: a resource-based perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). AIS, New Orleans (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duhan, S.: A capabilities based toolkit for strategic information systems planning in SMEs. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 27(5), 352–367 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L.: Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4), 685–695 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, W., Hsieh, J.: Beyond routine: symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ahuja, M.K., Thatcher, J.B.: Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Q. 29, 427–459 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carter, M., Petter, S., Grover, V., Thatcher, J.B.: Information technology identity: a key determinant of IT feature and exploratory usage. MIS Q. 44(3), 983–1021 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, M.-H., Rust, R.T.: A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 49(1), 30–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shrestha, Y.R., Ben-Menahem, S.M., Von Krogh, G.: Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61(4), 66–83 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van de Wetering, R., Versendaal, J.: Information technology ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability, and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: empirical study. JMIRx Med 2(4), e32336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/32336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Van de Wetering, R.: Enterprise architecture resources, dynamic capabilities, and their pathways to operational value. In: Proceedings of the Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). AIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Braganza, A., Brooks, L., Nepelski, D., Ali, M., Moro, R.: Resource management in big data initiatives: processes and dynamic capabilities. J. Bus. Res. 70, 328–337 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Van de Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J.: Strategic value creation through big data analytics capabilities: a configurational approach. In: 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 1, pp. 268–275. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Van de Wetering, R., Bosua, R., Boersma, C., Dohmen, D.: Information technology ambidexterity-driven patient agility, patient service-and market performance: a variance and fsQCA approach. Sustainability 14(7), 4371 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Diaz-Fernandez, M., Pasamar-Reyes, S., Valle-Cabrera, R.: Human capital and human resource management to achieve ambidextrous learning: a structural perspective. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 20(1), 63–77 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miles, R.H., Kanazawa, M.T.: Big Ideas to big results: leading corporate transformation in a disruptive world. FT Press, New Jersey (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Manag. J. 47(2), 209–226 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jansen, J.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52(11), 1661–1674 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Miles, R.H.: Accelerating corporate transformations (don’t lose your nerve!). Harv. Bus. Rev. HBR 88(1/2), 67–75 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Miles, R.H.: Beyond the age of Dilbert: accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organ. Dyn. 29(4), 313 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ali, Z., Sun, H., Ali, M.: The impact of managerial and adaptive capabilities to stimulate organizational innovation in SMEs: a complementary PLS–SEM approach. Sustainability 9(12), 2157 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li, X., Hsieh, J.P.-A., Rai, A.: Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: an investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Inf. Syst. Res. 24(3), 659–682 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, J.-S., Tsou, H.-T.: Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 29(1), 71–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Henseler, J.: Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: analyzing latent and emergent variables. Guilford Publications, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS (2015). https://www.smartpls.com

  54. Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A.: Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q. 31(4), 623–656 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modelling. Multi. J. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nitzl, C., Roldan, J.L., Cepeda, G.: Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(9), 1849–1864 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Van de Wetering, R.: Understanding the impact of enterprise architecture driven dynamic capabilities on agility: a variance and fsQCA study. Pac. Asia J. Asso. Inf. Syst. 13(4), 32–68 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogier van de Wetering .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van de Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., Dennehy, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Ambidexterity, Adaptive Transformation Capability, and Their Impact on Performance Under Tumultuous Times. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World. I3E 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15341-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15342-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics