Skip to main content

The Reciprocal Theorem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elasticity

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 172))

  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we exploited the idea that the strain energy U stored in an elastic structure must be equal to the work done by the external loads, if these are applied sufficiently slowly for inertia effects to be negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The equation appears to be dimensionally inconsistent, but we must remember that the loading comprises a traction of unit magnitude. The dimensions could be made explicit by writing \(\sigma _{xx}=\sigma _{yy}=\sigma _{zz}=S\), where S is a constant with dimensions of stress which will be found to cancel in the final expression for \(\varDelta V_1\).

  2. 2.

    J. D. Renton (1991), Generalized beam theory applied to shear stiffness, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 27, pp. 1955–1967, argues that the correct shear stiffness for a beam of any cross section should be that which equates the strain energy associated with the shear stresses \(\sigma _{xz}, \sigma _{yz}\) and the work done by the shear force against the shear deflection. For the rectangular beam of §9.1, this is equivalent to replacing the multiplier on \(b^2/a^2\) in (9.13)\(_{2,3}\) by \(2.4(1\!+\!\nu )\). This estimate differs from (9.13)\(_3\) by at most 3%.

  3. 3.

    R. T. Shield (1967), Load-displacement relations for elastic bodies, Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, Vol. 18, pp. 682–693.

  4. 4.

    An approximate solution to this problem for a punch of fairly general plan-form is given by V. I. Fabrikant (1986), Flat punch of arbitrary shape on an elastic half-space, International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 24, pp. 1731–1740. Fabrikant’s solution and the above reciprocal theorem argument are used as the bases of an approximate solution of the general smooth punch problem by J. R. Barber and D. A. Billings (1990), An approximate solution for the contact area and elastic compliance of a smooth punch of arbitrary shape, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 32, pp. 991–997.

  5. 5.

    R. T. Shield, loc. cit..

  6. 6.

    See for example, Problem 38.10.

  7. 7.

    J.N.Goodier, Proceedings of the 3rd U.S. National Congress on Applied Mechanics, (1958), pp. 343–345.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Barber .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barber, J.R. (2022). The Reciprocal Theorem. In: Elasticity. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 172. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15214-6_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics