Skip to main content

Directors and Officers Insurance and COVID-19: Future Exclusions with Retroactive Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Covid-19 and Insurance

Part of the book series: AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation ((ERSILR,volume 7))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

The claims-made clause is often not understood by policyholders in general and consumers in particular. Aggravating this situation is the fact that some insurance companies have incorporated an exclusion of future coverage with retroactive application. We understand that said clauses are abusive and absolutely null and void since they violate fundamental legal principles and—among others—reasonable expectations, transparency, and good faith.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sobrino (2018), pp. 1675–1795.

  2. 2.

    Muñoz Paredes (2021), p. 167.

  3. 3.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.

  4. 4.

    Sobrino (2020b), pp. 397–439.

  5. 5.

    Guertin (2020).

  6. 6.

    Welch and McDonald (2020).

  7. 7.

    Sobrino (2018), pp. 1235–1304.

  8. 8.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 674–691.

  9. 9.

    Yzquierdo Tolsada (1999), p. 229, noted: the “claims-made” clause is about “a legal outrage,” adding that it is “a trap created by insurers that endangers the civil liability insurance institution itself”.

  10. 10.

    Sobrino (2020b), pp. 397–439.

  11. 11.

    Keeton and Widiss (1988) noted: “this insurance applies to ‘bodily injury’ and ‘property damage’ only if a claim for damages because of the ‘bodily injury’ or ‘property damage’ is first made against any insured during the policy period”.

  12. 12.

    Jerry II (1987), p. 287, explains: “claims made policies provide coverage if the act or neglect is discovered and brought to the insurer's attention during the policy's term, regardless of when the act occurred”.

  13. 13.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1255.

  14. 14.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1257.

  15. 15.

    Kafka (2001).

  16. 16.

    Sobrino (2009), p. 1.

  17. 17.

    Passannante and Gold (2015) explains that it is essential that the Directors & Officers Insurance Policy have the highest possible retroactivity, highlighting that the insurance “may have a ‘retroactive date’ or a ‘prior and pending litigation “date”.

  18. 18.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 654.

  19. 19.

    Hans (2015) explains: where, taking into account the experience and the problems of these issues, regarding the doubts regarding whether to make the Preventive Complaint, the suggestion is “when doubt … notify”.

  20. 20.

    Gauntlett (2017), p. 26, who states that “sometimes risk and insurance professionals are reluctant to give notice to insurers of potential business litigation lawsuit when it isn’t clear that the event is covered under their policies or in fear that future premiums will be adversely affected”. But, despite this, it explains the great importance of notifying the loss or an event that may lead to a claim, as soon as possible.

  21. 21.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 658.

  22. 22.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 660.

  23. 23.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1759.

  24. 24.

    Miranda Serrano (2017), p. 49.

  25. 25.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 656.

  26. 26.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1759.

  27. 27.

    See: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020.

  28. 28.

    See: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF%20HGHI_Outbreak_Readiness_Business_Impact.pdf.

  29. 29.

    Taleb (2016).

  30. 30.

    Preve (2020).

  31. 31.

    Harckham (2020).

  32. 32.

    Reuhs (2020).

  33. 33.

    Moraes Miranda et al. (2021), p. 143.

  34. 34.

    Veiga Copo (2020a), p. 484.

  35. 35.

    Lacroix (2020).

  36. 36.

    Healy et al. (2020).

  37. 37.

    Regarding Malpractice Insurance, it should be noted that some Argentine Insurance Companies (such as S.M.G.; Sancor, etc.) issued separate statements indicating that the damages related to the coronavirus had insurance coverage.

  38. 38.

    Muñoz Paredes (2021), p. 167.

  39. 39.

    Dobbyn and French (2016), p. 228.

  40. 40.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021b), p. 8.

  41. 41.

    Sobrino (2018), pp. 1691–1795.

  42. 42.

    Stiglitz (2008) p. 253.

  43. 43.

    Keeton and Widiss (1988), p. 46.

  44. 44.

    Browne (1961).

  45. 45.

    Tabares Cortez (2020), pp. 145–170.

  46. 46.

    See Dictionary of Insurance Terms (2000), “All Risk” page 24, where it is explained that “All Risk insurance that covers each and every loss except for those specifically excluded. If the insurance company does not specifically exclude a particular loss, it is automatically covered”.

  47. 47.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021b), pp. 461–467.

  48. 48.

    Bataller Grau (2017), pp. 109–129.

  49. 49.

    See Conference by Waldo Sobrino, dated November 17, 1999, on the topic: “Medical Liability Insurance. Coverages. The ‘Claims Made’ Clause: analysis of its validity. The discussion on the exclusion clauses derived from the ‘Y2K’ (‘Millennium Bug’)”, in the Postgraduate Training Conference “Malpractice and Medical Responsibility”, organized by the ‘Master Group Argentina’, at the Argenta Convention Center Tower Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  50. 50.

    Sobrino (1999).

  51. 51.

    Sobrino (2003), p. 48.

  52. 52.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1703.

  53. 53.

    Guertin (2020).

  54. 54.

    Sun Tzu (2012).

  55. 55.

    Wolf (2020) consider providing “Notice of Circumstance”, where it states that “businesses should be aware that in similar contexts, where the prior claims-made policy (without an exclusion) generally covers only claims ‘made’ and noticed to the insurer before the policy expires, the newly purchased policy expressly excludes certain claims, and such claims are filed against the business during the new policy period, insurers often deny coverage under both the old and new policies”.

  56. 56.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.

  57. 57.

    Welch and McDonald (2020).

  58. 58.

    Fuller (1991).

  59. 59.

    Sobrino (2018), pp. 1691–1795.

  60. 60.

    Sanchez Calero (2001).

  61. 61.

    Sobrino (2018), p 1703.

  62. 62.

    Shina (2019), p. 76.

  63. 63.

    Harari (2018), p. 258.

  64. 64.

    Kahneman (2018).

  65. 65.

    Akerlof and Shiller (2016).

  66. 66.

    Thaler and Sunstein (2018), p. 21.

  67. 67.

    Thaler (2017).

  68. 68.

    Kahneman (2018).

  69. 69.

    Shina (2021).

  70. 70.

    Nader (2016), p. 70, who teaches that “… even law Professors have admitted they often do not read the fine print of some contracts when they purchase goods and services, because it is futile to try to make any changes…”.

  71. 71.

    French (2016), pp. 537–538 where it explains that insurance policies are received long after they have started to be paid, adding “then, if and when the purchaser receive a copy, most do not read it , and even if they did, they could not understand it due to its length, structure, and complexity” (so if the buyer receives a copy, most don’t read it, and even if they did, they couldn’t understand it due to its length, structure and complexity).

  72. 72.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 1703.

  73. 73.

    Radin (2013), p. 12.

  74. 74.

    Sobrino (2020a), p. 41.

  75. 75.

    Nietzsche (2020).

  76. 76.

    Sobrino (2017), p. 1.

  77. 77.

    Émérigon (1828), p. 53.

  78. 78.

    Veiga Copo (2020b), pp. 130–149.

  79. 79.

    Muñoz Paredes (2020a).

  80. 80.

    Sobrino (2021c), p. 45.

  81. 81.

    Sobrino (2021d), p. 1.

  82. 82.

    Lopez Oneto (2021), p. 105.

  83. 83.

    Sobrino (2021d), p. 1.

  84. 84.

    Muñoz Paredes (2020b), p. 141.

  85. 85.

    Veiga Copo (2020b), pp. 130–149.

  86. 86.

    Sobrino (2021e).

  87. 87.

    Sobrino (2021e), pp. 419–441.

  88. 88.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 90–151.

  89. 89.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 344.

  90. 90.

    Halperin (1970), p. 9, where the brilliant creator of the Insurance Law, more than fifty years ago already highlighted the importance of the “reasonable beliefs” (that is, what we now call “reasonable expectations”) of the insured.

  91. 91.

    Veiga Copo (2012), p. 136 where it explains that it is essential that the “clauses respond to the legitimate expectations” of the insured.

  92. 92.

    Sobrino (2020a), p. 51.

  93. 93.

    Keeton and Widiss (1988), p. 627. Jerry II (1987), p. 106.

    Donnelly and Brown (2014), p. 177, where the judgment is cited “Brissette vs. Westbury Life Insurance Company” , where it is established “generally, the aim of that doctrine is to make certain that insurance policies provide the coverage which the insured can reasonably expect to receive.

  94. 94.

    Sobrino (2018), p. 65.

  95. 95.

    Anderson et al. (2015), pp. 2–19, where in relation to the doctrine of “Reasonable Expectations” it is stated that “In 1970, Professor Keeton formulated that doctrine as follows: ‘the objectively reasonable expectations of applicants and intended beneficiaries regarding the terms of insurance contracts will be honored even though painstacking study of the policy provisions would have negated those expectations’”.

    Jordan (2007), p. 324, where it is held that when the doctrine of reasonable expectations of the insured is applied, the Courts must honor and follow the guidelines of the objective that the insured had, according to their reasonable expectations, beyond of the terms of the insurance contract, despite a careful study of the pressures of the policy denying said expectations.

    Dobbyn (1993), p. 96.

    Swedloff (2020), p. 2051.

  96. 96.

    Kafka (2001).

  97. 97.

    Sobrino (2009), p. 1.

  98. 98.

    Miranda Serrano (2017), pp. 45–48.

  99. 99.

    Martinez Muñoz (2020), p. 570.

  100. 100.

    Veiga Copo (2012), p. 234.

  101. 101.

    Medina Magallanes (2011), p. 22, where the outstanding Mexican doctrinaire teaches, which should be called “exquisite good faith -uberrimae bona fidei-”.

  102. 102.

    Emerson (2015), who teaches that “Insurers must act in good faith. Failure to do so (e.g. denying a legitimate claim) is an act of ‘bad faith’, that must lead a liability for compensatory and punitive damages”.

  103. 103.

    Downs and Murphy (2007), pp. 6–7.

  104. 104.

    Borges (2000), p. 141.

  105. 105.

    Novetsky and Schiffer (2014), p. 11 where they determine that “the duty of utmost good faith goes beyond the traditional duty of good faith and fair dealing implicit in every contract”, published at irmi.com, 2014.

  106. 106.

    Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.

  107. 107.

    Guertin (2020).

  108. 108.

    In Argentina, the “Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause” is an abusive clause for violating Art. 42 of the National Constitution; International Human Rights Treaties (Art. 75, subsection 22 of the Magna Carta), Arts. 1094, 1118, 1119, 1743, 9, 10 and concordant with the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation; Article 37 of the Consumer Defense Law; the Arts. 109, 59, 118, 158 and complementary to the Insurance Law; Art. 25 of Law 20.091, etc.

  109. 109.

    We recall that Resolution No. 585/17 of the Superintendency of Insurance of the Nation (Argentina), ordered the mandatory application of an Extended Period of Notifications of three (3) years, automatically, without conditions and without additional premium cost, in such a way that the insured, with all logic and foundation, may successfully require that the text of the 2020 Policy be applied (which did not have the Covid-19 exclusion), as a consequence of the Extended Period of Notifications (Resolution No. 585), which is fully current and applicable (requiring that the text of the Policy for the year 2021 not be applied, in the event that it includes the ‘Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause’).

References

  • Akerlof G, Shiller R (2016) La Economía de la Manipulación (como caemos como incautos en las trampas del mercado). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Stanzler J, Masters L (2015) Insurance coverage litigation, 2nd edn. Editorial Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataller Grau J (2017) La Modificación del Contrato de seguro. In Bataller Grau J, Jesús Peñas Moyano M (Dir) Un Derecho del Seguro más social y transparente. Thomson Reuters Editorial - Aranzadi – Civitas, Spain, Navarra, pp 109–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges JL (2000) “Tema del Traidor y del Héroe”, in the Ficciones collection. Editorial Planeta De Agostini, Madrid, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne D (1961) Mac Gillivray on Insurance Law (relating to all risks other than marine), 5th edn. Edit. Sweet & Maxwell, Londres

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary of Insurance Terms (2000) Fourth Edition, Edit. Barrons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbyn J, French C (2016) Insurance law, 5th edn. West Academic Publishing, Estados Unidos

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbyn JF (1993) Insurance Law, Ed. West Publishing Company, Minnesota, second reprint, p 96

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly T, Brown C (2014) Insurance Contract Interpretation, Ed. Carswell - Thomson Reuters, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs AB, Murphy L (2007) Property insurance litigator’s handbook. American Bar Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Émérigon (1828) Traité des Assurances et des Contrats a la grosse, Volume One, Chapter I ‘Observations Générales’. Rennes, Chez Molliex, Libraire-Editeur, Chez Charles-Béchet, Libraire, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RW (2015) Business law. Editorial Barrons, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • French C (2016) Understanding Insurance Policies as a noncontracts: an alternative approach to drafting and construing these unique financial instruments. published in Pennsylvania State Law Review, Paper N ° 10-2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller LL (1991) El Caso de los Exploradores de Cavernas. (trans: Carrió GR, Nillus LJ). Editorial Abeledo-Perrot, Buenos Aires, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett D (2017) Promptly provide Insurers with Notice of lawsuits. Published in IRMI Update “25 Risk.Conquering ideas”, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Guertin T (2020) Can Isurers retroactively modify policies to Exclude Coronavirus? Published in Lexology, dated March 20, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin I (1970) El Juez y la aplicación del Contrato de Seguro. In: Commercial Law Magazine and Obligations. Ediciones Depalma, Buenos Aires, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans P (2015) “Give Notice of your D&O Claim… Yesterday” published in ‘Policy Advisor’ Anderson Kill, dated February 19, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Harari YN (2018) 21 lecciones para el siglo XXI. Editorial Penguin Random House, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Harckham F (2020) Insurance coverage for perils created by the Coronavirus Pandemic. Published in Anderson Kill, March, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy D; Palley S, Orin R (2020) Many Liability Insurances Policies may provide coverage for losses form Coronavirus. Published in AndersoKill Alert, March, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerry II RH (1987) Understanding Insurance Law, Ed. Mathew Bender & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan LJ (2007) Property Insurance Litigator’s Handbook, bajo la Coordinación de Leonard E. Murphy, Andrew B. Downs and Jay M. Levin. American Bar Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka F (2001) The trial. Bureau Editor, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2018) Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Editorial Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton RF, Widiss A (1988) Insurance Law (a guide to fundamental principles, legal doctrines and commercial practices). West Publishing Co., Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix K (2020) The risk of Coronavirus-related Directors & Officers Claims?, published in The D&O Diary, dated March 2, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez Oneto M (2021) Fundamentos Antropológicos, Eticos, Filosóficos, Históricos, Sociológicos y Jurídicos para la Constitución Universal de un Derecho de la Inteligencia Artificial (DIA). In: Tratado de Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho, under the direction of Juan G. Corvalán; vol. I. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires, p 105

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Muñoz F (2020) La protección del Asegurado en la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo. In: Retos y Desafíos del Contrato de Seguro: del necesario ‘aggiornamiento’ a la metamorfosis del contrato (Libro Homenaje al Profesor Rubén Stiglitz), Director: Abel Veiga Copo; Chapter 20, Editorial Civitas - Thomson Reuters, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina Magallanes P (2011) Ley sobre el Contrato de Seguro Comentada. Editorial Porrúa, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda Serrano LM (2017) Control de Transparencia de las condiciones del contrato de seguro (más allá de los clásicos requisitos de inclusión). In: Bataller Grau J, Jesús Peñas Moyano M (Dir) Un Derecho del Seguro más social y transparente. Editorial Thomson Reuters - Aranzadi - Civitas; Spain, Navarra

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes Miranda R, Mello PI, Nonato PD (2021) Cobertura para Lucros Cessantes nos Seguros Patrimoniais: a Covid-19 e a Interrupcao das actividades comerciais do asegurado. Publicado en Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo (Directors Ernesto Tzirulnik and Paulo Luiz de Toledo Piza), Editorial Roncarati, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Paredes ML (2020a) Algoritmos y Seguro: la fijación de la prima atendiendo a factores ajenos al riesgo. Published in Almacén de Derecho, dated July 27, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Paredes ML (2020b) Big Data y contrato de seguro: los datos generados por los asegurados y su utilización por los aseguradores. Chapter III “Advantages and Disadvantages of the use of Big Data in the Insurance sector’, published in the book Regulation of Algorithms, Director: Alejandro Huergo Lora, Editorial Aranzadi, Navarra, Spain, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Paredes ML (2021) Economía Colaborativa, Contrato de Seguros e impacto del Covid-19. Published in Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo (Directors Ernesto Tzirulnik and Paulo Luiz de Toledo Piza), Vol II, Chapter 37. Editorial Roncarati, Brazil, p 167

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader R (2016) Breaking Through Power (It’s easier than we think), Editorial Open Media Series / City Lights Books, United States, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (2020) Humano demasiado humano. Editorial LEA, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Novetsky Z, Schiffer L (2014) The Duty of ‘Utmost Good Faith’. In: 50 Reinsurences cases every Risk Professional should now (and analysis to the Top 50 Reinsurance cases and their implications. Published at irmi.com

  • Passannante W, Gold J (2015) 10 Traps in your Directors & Officers Insurance. Published in Anderson Kill “Policyholder Advisor”, May/June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Preve L (2020) Gestión de riesgo y coronavirus: porqué la Pandemia no fue un Cisne Negro. Published in El Cronista, dated April 8, 2020 (https://www.cronista.com/columnistas/Gestion-de-riesgo-y-coronavirus-por-que-la-pandemia-no-fue-un-cisne-negro-20200408-0043.html)

  • Radin MJ (2013) Boilerplate; the fine print, vanishing rights and the rule of law. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuhs N (2020) Why everyone should tender a Covid-19 Business Interruption claim to their Insurers? Published in Lexology, dated March 17, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Calero F (2001) El Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil para Administradores, Directores y Gerentes de las Sociedades Mercantiles, Published in the “Spanish Insurance Magazine” Number 107, July / September 2001, Quarterly Publication of the Official Body of the Spanish Section of the “International Association of Insurance Law” (AIDA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shina F (2019) Los Contratos de Adhesión (conflictos derivados del contrato ‘No leído’). Editorial Hammurabi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shina F (2021) Las Neurociencias en la Actuación Profesional (análisis e impacto en las nuevas relaciones jurídicas). Editorial Hammurabi, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (1999) La Crisis Informática del Año 2000 y las Responsabilidades Legales de las Empresas, Directores y Profesionales. Published in “Y2K - Argentina (www.y2k.com.ar/Aspectos%20Legales/Laley.htm)

  • Sobrino W (2003) Internet y Alta Tecnología en el Derecho de Daños. Editorial Universidad, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2009) El Proceso de Liquidación de Siniestros de Seguros y ‘El Proceso’ de Franz Kafka: ¿ dos almas gemelas? Published in el Diario La Ley, Buenos Aires, October 13, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2017) El ‘Deber de Información, ‘Deber de Consejo’ y ‘Deber de Advertencia’ en materia de Seguros. Published in Diario ‘La Ley’, Buenos Aires, dated February 1, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2018) Seguros y el Código Civil y Comercial, Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Second updated and expanded edition, Buenos Aires, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2020a) Contratos, Neurociencias e Inteligencia Artificial. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2020b) La Cláusula ‘Claims Made’. Cobertura del Covid-19. In: Ghersi C, Weingarten C, Lovece G (Dir), Tratado de Derecho a la Salud, Vol II, Chapter 2. Editorial La Ley, Buenos Aires, pp 397–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2021a) Ley de Seguros Comentada. Sobrino W, Gava A Cerda S (Co-authors) Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2021b) Inteligencia artificial y neurociencias aplicadas en la Ley de Seguros. Published in S.A.I.J. (Sistema Argentino de Información Jurídica), www.saij.gob.ar; Id SAIJ: DACF210170, dated September 22, 2021

  • Sobrino W (2021c) Derecho y Economía del Comportamiento, Neurociencias e Inteligencia Artificial en el Seguro del Siglo XXI (y su aplicación a los Consumidores de Seguros). Published in Tzirulnik E, Luiz de Toledo Piza P (Dir) Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo, Vol II, Chapter 31. Editorial Roncarati, Brazil, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino W (2021d) Inteligencia Artificial y Neurociencias aplicadas en la Ley de Seguros. Published in the newspaper ‘La Ley’, page 1 and following, Buenos Aires, dated September 22, 2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino, W (2021e) Inteligencia Artificial, Neurociencias y Consumidores de Seguros. In: Tratado de Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho, under the direction of Juan G. Corvalán; Vol III. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires, pp 419–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz RS (2008) Derecho de Seguros, Editorial Abeledo-Perrot, 5th edn. Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Tzu (2012) El Arte de la Guerra. Editorial Longseller, Buenos Aires, p 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedloff R (2020) The new regulatory imperative for insurance, page 2,051, published in Bost Coll Law Rev 61(6):Article 3, dated June 26, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabares Cortez F (2020) El Coronavirus (Covid-19) y el Seguro de Interrupción de Negocios. Discusiones actuales sobre los daños inmateriales”, in the Ibero-Latin American Insurance Magazine, Volume 29, pages 145 to 170, January-June 2020, Colombia, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2016) El Cisne Negro (el impacto de lo altamente improbable). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R (2017) Portarse mal (el comportamiento irracional en la vida económica). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R, Sunstein C (2018) Un pequeño empujón (‘Nudge’). Editorial Taurus, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga Copo A (2012) Los Principios de Derecho Europeo del Contrato de Seguro, published by Grupo Editorial Ibañez y la Pontificia Javeriana University, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga Copo A (2020a) Seguros de Pérdida de Beneficios por Interrupción de Negocios, Editorial Civitas - Thomson Reuters, Navarra, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga Copo A (2020b) Seguro y Tecnología. El impacto de la digitalización en el contrato de seguro, Thomson Reuters Editorial, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch J, McDonald M (2020) Advice for providing Notice por D&O Policies renewing during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Published in Saxe, Doernberger & Vita, dated April, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf D (2020) For Business at risk of Covid-19 lawsuits, consider providing Notice of Circumstance. Published in The D&O Diary, dated March 25, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Yzquierdo Tolsada M (1999) Civil Aspects of the new Penal Code. Editorial Dykinson, Madrid, Spain, 1997 (cited by EVANGELIO LLORCA, Raquel; “The Insurance Contract in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence”, Second Part ‘Jurisprudence Comments’, Chapter 25 “The ‘Claims Made’ Clauses in the Insurance of Civil Liability - Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgments of March 20, 1991 and January 31, 1990”. Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch, Valencia, Spain, p 800

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waldo Sobrino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Documents

Legislation

  • In Argentina, the “Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause” is an abusive clause for violating Art. 42 of the National Constitution; International Human Rights Treaties (Art. 75, subsection 22 of the Magna Carta), Arts. 1094, 1118, 1119, 1743, 9, 10 and concordant with the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation; Article 37 of the Consumer Defense Law; the Arts. 109, 59, 118, 158 and complementary to the Insurance Law; Art. 25 of Law 20.091, etc.

  • We recall that Resolution No. 585/17 of the Superintendency of Insurance of the Nation (Argentina), ordered the mandatory application of an Extended Period of Notification of three (3) years, automatically, without conditions and without additional premium cost, in such a way that the insured, with all logic and foundation, may successfully require that the text of the 2020 Policy be applied (which did not have the Covid-19 exclusion), as a consequence of the Extended Period of Notification (Resolution No. 585), which is fully current and applicable (requiring that the text of the Policy for the year 2021 not be applied, in the event that it includes the ‘Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause’)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sobrino, W. (2023). Directors and Officers Insurance and COVID-19: Future Exclusions with Retroactive Application. In: Muñoz Paredes, M.L., Tarasiuk, A. (eds) Covid-19 and Insurance. AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13753-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13753-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13752-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13753-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics