Abstract
The claims-made clause is often not understood by policyholders in general and consumers in particular. Aggravating this situation is the fact that some insurance companies have incorporated an exclusion of future coverage with retroactive application. We understand that said clauses are abusive and absolutely null and void since they violate fundamental legal principles and—among others—reasonable expectations, transparency, and good faith.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sobrino (2018), pp. 1675–1795.
- 2.
Muñoz Paredes (2021), p. 167.
- 3.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.
- 4.
Sobrino (2020b), pp. 397–439.
- 5.
Guertin (2020).
- 6.
Welch and McDonald (2020).
- 7.
Sobrino (2018), pp. 1235–1304.
- 8.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 674–691.
- 9.
Yzquierdo Tolsada (1999), p. 229, noted: the “claims-made” clause is about “a legal outrage,” adding that it is “a trap created by insurers that endangers the civil liability insurance institution itself”.
- 10.
Sobrino (2020b), pp. 397–439.
- 11.
Keeton and Widiss (1988) noted: “this insurance applies to ‘bodily injury’ and ‘property damage’ only if a claim for damages because of the ‘bodily injury’ or ‘property damage’ is first made against any insured during the policy period”.
- 12.
Jerry II (1987), p. 287, explains: “claims made policies provide coverage if the act or neglect is discovered and brought to the insurer's attention during the policy's term, regardless of when the act occurred”.
- 13.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1255.
- 14.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1257.
- 15.
Kafka (2001).
- 16.
Sobrino (2009), p. 1.
- 17.
Passannante and Gold (2015) explains that it is essential that the Directors & Officers Insurance Policy have the highest possible retroactivity, highlighting that the insurance “may have a ‘retroactive date’ or a ‘prior and pending litigation “date”.
- 18.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 654.
- 19.
Hans (2015) explains: where, taking into account the experience and the problems of these issues, regarding the doubts regarding whether to make the Preventive Complaint, the suggestion is “when doubt … notify”.
- 20.
Gauntlett (2017), p. 26, who states that “sometimes risk and insurance professionals are reluctant to give notice to insurers of potential business litigation lawsuit when it isn’t clear that the event is covered under their policies or in fear that future premiums will be adversely affected”. But, despite this, it explains the great importance of notifying the loss or an event that may lead to a claim, as soon as possible.
- 21.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 658.
- 22.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 660.
- 23.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1759.
- 24.
Miranda Serrano (2017), p. 49.
- 25.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 656.
- 26.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1759.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
Taleb (2016).
- 30.
Preve (2020).
- 31.
Harckham (2020).
- 32.
Reuhs (2020).
- 33.
Moraes Miranda et al. (2021), p. 143.
- 34.
Veiga Copo (2020a), p. 484.
- 35.
Lacroix (2020).
- 36.
Healy et al. (2020).
- 37.
Regarding Malpractice Insurance, it should be noted that some Argentine Insurance Companies (such as S.M.G.; Sancor, etc.) issued separate statements indicating that the damages related to the coronavirus had insurance coverage.
- 38.
Muñoz Paredes (2021), p. 167.
- 39.
Dobbyn and French (2016), p. 228.
- 40.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021b), p. 8.
- 41.
Sobrino (2018), pp. 1691–1795.
- 42.
Stiglitz (2008) p. 253.
- 43.
Keeton and Widiss (1988), p. 46.
- 44.
Browne (1961).
- 45.
Tabares Cortez (2020), pp. 145–170.
- 46.
See Dictionary of Insurance Terms (2000), “All Risk” page 24, where it is explained that “All Risk insurance that covers each and every loss except for those specifically excluded. If the insurance company does not specifically exclude a particular loss, it is automatically covered”.
- 47.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021b), pp. 461–467.
- 48.
Bataller Grau (2017), pp. 109–129.
- 49.
See Conference by Waldo Sobrino, dated November 17, 1999, on the topic: “Medical Liability Insurance. Coverages. The ‘Claims Made’ Clause: analysis of its validity. The discussion on the exclusion clauses derived from the ‘Y2K’ (‘Millennium Bug’)”, in the Postgraduate Training Conference “Malpractice and Medical Responsibility”, organized by the ‘Master Group Argentina’, at the Argenta Convention Center Tower Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 50.
Sobrino (1999).
- 51.
Sobrino (2003), p. 48.
- 52.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1703.
- 53.
Guertin (2020).
- 54.
Sun Tzu (2012).
- 55.
Wolf (2020) consider providing “Notice of Circumstance”, where it states that “businesses should be aware that in similar contexts, where the prior claims-made policy (without an exclusion) generally covers only claims ‘made’ and noticed to the insurer before the policy expires, the newly purchased policy expressly excludes certain claims, and such claims are filed against the business during the new policy period, insurers often deny coverage under both the old and new policies”.
- 56.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.
- 57.
Welch and McDonald (2020).
- 58.
Fuller (1991).
- 59.
Sobrino (2018), pp. 1691–1795.
- 60.
Sanchez Calero (2001).
- 61.
Sobrino (2018), p 1703.
- 62.
Shina (2019), p. 76.
- 63.
Harari (2018), p. 258.
- 64.
Kahneman (2018).
- 65.
Akerlof and Shiller (2016).
- 66.
Thaler and Sunstein (2018), p. 21.
- 67.
Thaler (2017).
- 68.
Kahneman (2018).
- 69.
Shina (2021).
- 70.
Nader (2016), p. 70, who teaches that “… even law Professors have admitted they often do not read the fine print of some contracts when they purchase goods and services, because it is futile to try to make any changes…”.
- 71.
French (2016), pp. 537–538 where it explains that insurance policies are received long after they have started to be paid, adding “then, if and when the purchaser receive a copy, most do not read it , and even if they did, they could not understand it due to its length, structure, and complexity” (so if the buyer receives a copy, most don’t read it, and even if they did, they couldn’t understand it due to its length, structure and complexity).
- 72.
Sobrino (2018), p. 1703.
- 73.
Radin (2013), p. 12.
- 74.
Sobrino (2020a), p. 41.
- 75.
Nietzsche (2020).
- 76.
Sobrino (2017), p. 1.
- 77.
Émérigon (1828), p. 53.
- 78.
Veiga Copo (2020b), pp. 130–149.
- 79.
Muñoz Paredes (2020a).
- 80.
Sobrino (2021c), p. 45.
- 81.
Sobrino (2021d), p. 1.
- 82.
Lopez Oneto (2021), p. 105.
- 83.
Sobrino (2021d), p. 1.
- 84.
Muñoz Paredes (2020b), p. 141.
- 85.
Veiga Copo (2020b), pp. 130–149.
- 86.
Sobrino (2021e).
- 87.
Sobrino (2021e), pp. 419–441.
- 88.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 90–151.
- 89.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), p. 344.
- 90.
Halperin (1970), p. 9, where the brilliant creator of the Insurance Law, more than fifty years ago already highlighted the importance of the “reasonable beliefs” (that is, what we now call “reasonable expectations”) of the insured.
- 91.
Veiga Copo (2012), p. 136 where it explains that it is essential that the “clauses respond to the legitimate expectations” of the insured.
- 92.
Sobrino (2020a), p. 51.
- 93.
Keeton and Widiss (1988), p. 627. Jerry II (1987), p. 106.
Donnelly and Brown (2014), p. 177, where the judgment is cited “Brissette vs. Westbury Life Insurance Company” , where it is established “generally, the aim of that doctrine is to make certain that insurance policies provide the coverage which the insured can reasonably expect to receive.
- 94.
Sobrino (2018), p. 65.
- 95.
Anderson et al. (2015), pp. 2–19, where in relation to the doctrine of “Reasonable Expectations” it is stated that “In 1970, Professor Keeton formulated that doctrine as follows: ‘the objectively reasonable expectations of applicants and intended beneficiaries regarding the terms of insurance contracts will be honored even though painstacking study of the policy provisions would have negated those expectations’”.
Jordan (2007), p. 324, where it is held that when the doctrine of reasonable expectations of the insured is applied, the Courts must honor and follow the guidelines of the objective that the insured had, according to their reasonable expectations, beyond of the terms of the insurance contract, despite a careful study of the pressures of the policy denying said expectations.
Dobbyn (1993), p. 96.
Swedloff (2020), p. 2051.
- 96.
Kafka (2001).
- 97.
Sobrino (2009), p. 1.
- 98.
Miranda Serrano (2017), pp. 45–48.
- 99.
Martinez Muñoz (2020), p. 570.
- 100.
Veiga Copo (2012), p. 234.
- 101.
Medina Magallanes (2011), p. 22, where the outstanding Mexican doctrinaire teaches, which should be called “exquisite good faith -uberrimae bona fidei-”.
- 102.
Emerson (2015), who teaches that “Insurers must act in good faith. Failure to do so (e.g. denying a legitimate claim) is an act of ‘bad faith’, that must lead a liability for compensatory and punitive damages”.
- 103.
Downs and Murphy (2007), pp. 6–7.
- 104.
Borges (2000), p. 141.
- 105.
- 106.
Sobrino-Gava-Cerda (2021a), pp. 647–691.
- 107.
Guertin (2020).
- 108.
In Argentina, the “Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause” is an abusive clause for violating Art. 42 of the National Constitution; International Human Rights Treaties (Art. 75, subsection 22 of the Magna Carta), Arts. 1094, 1118, 1119, 1743, 9, 10 and concordant with the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation; Article 37 of the Consumer Defense Law; the Arts. 109, 59, 118, 158 and complementary to the Insurance Law; Art. 25 of Law 20.091, etc.
- 109.
We recall that Resolution No. 585/17 of the Superintendency of Insurance of the Nation (Argentina), ordered the mandatory application of an Extended Period of Notifications of three (3) years, automatically, without conditions and without additional premium cost, in such a way that the insured, with all logic and foundation, may successfully require that the text of the 2020 Policy be applied (which did not have the Covid-19 exclusion), as a consequence of the Extended Period of Notifications (Resolution No. 585), which is fully current and applicable (requiring that the text of the Policy for the year 2021 not be applied, in the event that it includes the ‘Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause’).
References
Akerlof G, Shiller R (2016) La Economía de la Manipulación (como caemos como incautos en las trampas del mercado). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires
Anderson E, Stanzler J, Masters L (2015) Insurance coverage litigation, 2nd edn. Editorial Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, New York
Bataller Grau J (2017) La Modificación del Contrato de seguro. In Bataller Grau J, Jesús Peñas Moyano M (Dir) Un Derecho del Seguro más social y transparente. Thomson Reuters Editorial - Aranzadi – Civitas, Spain, Navarra, pp 109–129
Borges JL (2000) “Tema del Traidor y del Héroe”, in the Ficciones collection. Editorial Planeta De Agostini, Madrid, p 141
Browne D (1961) Mac Gillivray on Insurance Law (relating to all risks other than marine), 5th edn. Edit. Sweet & Maxwell, Londres
Dictionary of Insurance Terms (2000) Fourth Edition, Edit. Barrons, New York
Dobbyn J, French C (2016) Insurance law, 5th edn. West Academic Publishing, Estados Unidos
Dobbyn JF (1993) Insurance Law, Ed. West Publishing Company, Minnesota, second reprint, p 96
Donnelly T, Brown C (2014) Insurance Contract Interpretation, Ed. Carswell - Thomson Reuters, Canada
Downs AB, Murphy L (2007) Property insurance litigator’s handbook. American Bar Association, Chicago
Émérigon (1828) Traité des Assurances et des Contrats a la grosse, Volume One, Chapter I ‘Observations Générales’. Rennes, Chez Molliex, Libraire-Editeur, Chez Charles-Béchet, Libraire, Paris
Emerson RW (2015) Business law. Editorial Barrons, United States
French C (2016) Understanding Insurance Policies as a noncontracts: an alternative approach to drafting and construing these unique financial instruments. published in Pennsylvania State Law Review, Paper N ° 10-2016
Fuller LL (1991) El Caso de los Exploradores de Cavernas. (trans: Carrió GR, Nillus LJ). Editorial Abeledo-Perrot, Buenos Aires, p 73
Gauntlett D (2017) Promptly provide Insurers with Notice of lawsuits. Published in IRMI Update “25 Risk.Conquering ideas”, p 26
Guertin T (2020) Can Isurers retroactively modify policies to Exclude Coronavirus? Published in Lexology, dated March 20, 2020
Halperin I (1970) El Juez y la aplicación del Contrato de Seguro. In: Commercial Law Magazine and Obligations. Ediciones Depalma, Buenos Aires, p 9
Hans P (2015) “Give Notice of your D&O Claim… Yesterday” published in ‘Policy Advisor’ Anderson Kill, dated February 19, 2015
Harari YN (2018) 21 lecciones para el siglo XXI. Editorial Penguin Random House, Buenos Aires
Harckham F (2020) Insurance coverage for perils created by the Coronavirus Pandemic. Published in Anderson Kill, March, 2020
Healy D; Palley S, Orin R (2020) Many Liability Insurances Policies may provide coverage for losses form Coronavirus. Published in AndersoKill Alert, March, 2020
Jerry II RH (1987) Understanding Insurance Law, Ed. Mathew Bender & Company, New York
Jordan LJ (2007) Property Insurance Litigator’s Handbook, bajo la Coordinación de Leonard E. Murphy, Andrew B. Downs and Jay M. Levin. American Bar Association, Chicago
Kafka F (2001) The trial. Bureau Editor, Buenos Aires
Kahneman D (2018) Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Editorial Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, Buenos Aires
Keeton RF, Widiss A (1988) Insurance Law (a guide to fundamental principles, legal doctrines and commercial practices). West Publishing Co., Minnesota
Lacroix K (2020) The risk of Coronavirus-related Directors & Officers Claims?, published in The D&O Diary, dated March 2, 2020
Lopez Oneto M (2021) Fundamentos Antropológicos, Eticos, Filosóficos, Históricos, Sociológicos y Jurídicos para la Constitución Universal de un Derecho de la Inteligencia Artificial (DIA). In: Tratado de Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho, under the direction of Juan G. Corvalán; vol. I. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires, p 105
Martinez Muñoz F (2020) La protección del Asegurado en la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo. In: Retos y Desafíos del Contrato de Seguro: del necesario ‘aggiornamiento’ a la metamorfosis del contrato (Libro Homenaje al Profesor Rubén Stiglitz), Director: Abel Veiga Copo; Chapter 20, Editorial Civitas - Thomson Reuters, Spain
Medina Magallanes P (2011) Ley sobre el Contrato de Seguro Comentada. Editorial Porrúa, México
Miranda Serrano LM (2017) Control de Transparencia de las condiciones del contrato de seguro (más allá de los clásicos requisitos de inclusión). In: Bataller Grau J, Jesús Peñas Moyano M (Dir) Un Derecho del Seguro más social y transparente. Editorial Thomson Reuters - Aranzadi - Civitas; Spain, Navarra
Moraes Miranda R, Mello PI, Nonato PD (2021) Cobertura para Lucros Cessantes nos Seguros Patrimoniais: a Covid-19 e a Interrupcao das actividades comerciais do asegurado. Publicado en Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo (Directors Ernesto Tzirulnik and Paulo Luiz de Toledo Piza), Editorial Roncarati, Brazil
Muñoz Paredes ML (2020a) Algoritmos y Seguro: la fijación de la prima atendiendo a factores ajenos al riesgo. Published in Almacén de Derecho, dated July 27, 2020
Muñoz Paredes ML (2020b) Big Data y contrato de seguro: los datos generados por los asegurados y su utilización por los aseguradores. Chapter III “Advantages and Disadvantages of the use of Big Data in the Insurance sector’, published in the book Regulation of Algorithms, Director: Alejandro Huergo Lora, Editorial Aranzadi, Navarra, Spain, p 141
Muñoz Paredes ML (2021) Economía Colaborativa, Contrato de Seguros e impacto del Covid-19. Published in Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo (Directors Ernesto Tzirulnik and Paulo Luiz de Toledo Piza), Vol II, Chapter 37. Editorial Roncarati, Brazil, p 167
Nader R (2016) Breaking Through Power (It’s easier than we think), Editorial Open Media Series / City Lights Books, United States, California
Nietzsche F (2020) Humano demasiado humano. Editorial LEA, Buenos Aires
Novetsky Z, Schiffer L (2014) The Duty of ‘Utmost Good Faith’. In: 50 Reinsurences cases every Risk Professional should now (and analysis to the Top 50 Reinsurance cases and their implications. Published at irmi.com
Passannante W, Gold J (2015) 10 Traps in your Directors & Officers Insurance. Published in Anderson Kill “Policyholder Advisor”, May/June 2015
Preve L (2020) Gestión de riesgo y coronavirus: porqué la Pandemia no fue un Cisne Negro. Published in El Cronista, dated April 8, 2020 (https://www.cronista.com/columnistas/Gestion-de-riesgo-y-coronavirus-por-que-la-pandemia-no-fue-un-cisne-negro-20200408-0043.html)
Radin MJ (2013) Boilerplate; the fine print, vanishing rights and the rule of law. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Reuhs N (2020) Why everyone should tender a Covid-19 Business Interruption claim to their Insurers? Published in Lexology, dated March 17, 2020
Sanchez Calero F (2001) El Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil para Administradores, Directores y Gerentes de las Sociedades Mercantiles, Published in the “Spanish Insurance Magazine” Number 107, July / September 2001, Quarterly Publication of the Official Body of the Spanish Section of the “International Association of Insurance Law” (AIDA)
Shina F (2019) Los Contratos de Adhesión (conflictos derivados del contrato ‘No leído’). Editorial Hammurabi
Shina F (2021) Las Neurociencias en la Actuación Profesional (análisis e impacto en las nuevas relaciones jurídicas). Editorial Hammurabi, Buenos Aires
Sobrino W (1999) La Crisis Informática del Año 2000 y las Responsabilidades Legales de las Empresas, Directores y Profesionales. Published in “Y2K - Argentina (www.y2k.com.ar/Aspectos%20Legales/Laley.htm)
Sobrino W (2003) Internet y Alta Tecnología en el Derecho de Daños. Editorial Universidad, Buenos Aires
Sobrino W (2009) El Proceso de Liquidación de Siniestros de Seguros y ‘El Proceso’ de Franz Kafka: ¿ dos almas gemelas? Published in el Diario La Ley, Buenos Aires, October 13, 2009
Sobrino W (2017) El ‘Deber de Información, ‘Deber de Consejo’ y ‘Deber de Advertencia’ en materia de Seguros. Published in Diario ‘La Ley’, Buenos Aires, dated February 1, 2017
Sobrino W (2018) Seguros y el Código Civil y Comercial, Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Second updated and expanded edition, Buenos Aires, April 2018
Sobrino W (2020a) Contratos, Neurociencias e Inteligencia Artificial. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires
Sobrino W (2020b) La Cláusula ‘Claims Made’. Cobertura del Covid-19. In: Ghersi C, Weingarten C, Lovece G (Dir), Tratado de Derecho a la Salud, Vol II, Chapter 2. Editorial La Ley, Buenos Aires, pp 397–439
Sobrino W (2021a) Ley de Seguros Comentada. Sobrino W, Gava A Cerda S (Co-authors) Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires
Sobrino W (2021b) Inteligencia artificial y neurociencias aplicadas en la Ley de Seguros. Published in S.A.I.J. (Sistema Argentino de Información Jurídica), www.saij.gob.ar; Id SAIJ: DACF210170, dated September 22, 2021
Sobrino W (2021c) Derecho y Economía del Comportamiento, Neurociencias e Inteligencia Artificial en el Seguro del Siglo XXI (y su aplicación a los Consumidores de Seguros). Published in Tzirulnik E, Luiz de Toledo Piza P (Dir) Direito do Seguro Contemporaneo, Vol II, Chapter 31. Editorial Roncarati, Brazil, p 45
Sobrino W (2021d) Inteligencia Artificial y Neurociencias aplicadas en la Ley de Seguros. Published in the newspaper ‘La Ley’, page 1 and following, Buenos Aires, dated September 22, 2021
Sobrino, W (2021e) Inteligencia Artificial, Neurociencias y Consumidores de Seguros. In: Tratado de Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho, under the direction of Juan G. Corvalán; Vol III. Editorial La Ley - Thomson Reuters, Buenos Aires, pp 419–441
Stiglitz RS (2008) Derecho de Seguros, Editorial Abeledo-Perrot, 5th edn. Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires
Sun Tzu (2012) El Arte de la Guerra. Editorial Longseller, Buenos Aires, p 2012
Swedloff R (2020) The new regulatory imperative for insurance, page 2,051, published in Bost Coll Law Rev 61(6):Article 3, dated June 26, 2020
Tabares Cortez F (2020) El Coronavirus (Covid-19) y el Seguro de Interrupción de Negocios. Discusiones actuales sobre los daños inmateriales”, in the Ibero-Latin American Insurance Magazine, Volume 29, pages 145 to 170, January-June 2020, Colombia, Bogotá
Taleb NN (2016) El Cisne Negro (el impacto de lo altamente improbable). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires
Thaler R (2017) Portarse mal (el comportamiento irracional en la vida económica). Editorial Paidos, Buenos Aires
Thaler R, Sunstein C (2018) Un pequeño empujón (‘Nudge’). Editorial Taurus, Buenos Aires
Veiga Copo A (2012) Los Principios de Derecho Europeo del Contrato de Seguro, published by Grupo Editorial Ibañez y la Pontificia Javeriana University, Bogotá
Veiga Copo A (2020a) Seguros de Pérdida de Beneficios por Interrupción de Negocios, Editorial Civitas - Thomson Reuters, Navarra, Spain
Veiga Copo A (2020b) Seguro y Tecnología. El impacto de la digitalización en el contrato de seguro, Thomson Reuters Editorial, Spain
Welch J, McDonald M (2020) Advice for providing Notice por D&O Policies renewing during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Published in Saxe, Doernberger & Vita, dated April, 2020
Wolf D (2020) For Business at risk of Covid-19 lawsuits, consider providing Notice of Circumstance. Published in The D&O Diary, dated March 25, 2020
Yzquierdo Tolsada M (1999) Civil Aspects of the new Penal Code. Editorial Dykinson, Madrid, Spain, 1997 (cited by EVANGELIO LLORCA, Raquel; “The Insurance Contract in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence”, Second Part ‘Jurisprudence Comments’, Chapter 25 “The ‘Claims Made’ Clauses in the Insurance of Civil Liability - Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgments of March 20, 1991 and January 31, 1990”. Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch, Valencia, Spain, p 800
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Documents
-
https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
-
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF%20HGHI_Outbreak_Readiness_Business_Impact.pdf
Legislation
-
In Argentina, the “Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause” is an abusive clause for violating Art. 42 of the National Constitution; International Human Rights Treaties (Art. 75, subsection 22 of the Magna Carta), Arts. 1094, 1118, 1119, 1743, 9, 10 and concordant with the Civil and Commercial Code of the Nation; Article 37 of the Consumer Defense Law; the Arts. 109, 59, 118, 158 and complementary to the Insurance Law; Art. 25 of Law 20.091, etc.
-
We recall that Resolution No. 585/17 of the Superintendency of Insurance of the Nation (Argentina), ordered the mandatory application of an Extended Period of Notification of three (3) years, automatically, without conditions and without additional premium cost, in such a way that the insured, with all logic and foundation, may successfully require that the text of the 2020 Policy be applied (which did not have the Covid-19 exclusion), as a consequence of the Extended Period of Notification (Resolution No. 585), which is fully current and applicable (requiring that the text of the Policy for the year 2021 not be applied, in the event that it includes the ‘Retroactive Coverage Exclusion Clause’)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sobrino, W. (2023). Directors and Officers Insurance and COVID-19: Future Exclusions with Retroactive Application. In: Muñoz Paredes, M.L., Tarasiuk, A. (eds) Covid-19 and Insurance. AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13753-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13753-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13752-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13753-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)