Skip to main content

Role of Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamentals of Bile Duct Injuries
  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

Imaging has a decisive role in every stage of a Bile Duct Injury (BDI), from prevention to ultimate management.

Preoperative Ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can warn of the likelihood of difficult cholecystectomy, while the use of Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) or Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography contributes to the early diagnosis of the lesion injury and avoids further damage if the intraoperative imaging is interpreted correctly.

If the BDI happened to occur, the abdominal US and Computed Tomography (CT) scan represents the first-line methods addressing the patient’s immediate needs (sepsis, fluid collections, peritonitis, perforation, etc.).

MRI/MRCP and the use of hepato-specific agents provide a correct evaluation of the biliary anatomy with the detection of possible bile leaks.

Finally, the use of CT angiography allows a precise characterization of the associated vascular injuries, decisive for planning the resolution of the BDI.

We thoroughly discuss the extension and application of these methods in the different stages of this disease throughout the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvarez FA, de Santibañes M, Palavecino M, Sánchez Clariá R, Mazza O, Arbues G, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J. Impact of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy on bile duct injury. Br J Surg. 2014;101:677–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melamud K, LeBedis CA, Anderson SW, Soto JA. Biliary imaging: multimodality approach to imaging of biliary injuries and their complications. Radiographics. 2014;34:613–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto JA, Corvera CA, Hussain HK. MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics. 2009;29:1669–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H. Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de’ Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, et al. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hyodo T, Kumano S, Kushihata F, Okada M, Hirata M, Tsuda T, Takada Y, Mochizuki T, Murakami T. CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in the perioperative evaluation of the biliary tree. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:887–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy S, Lopes Vendrami C, Mittal P, Borhani AA, Moreno CC, Miller FH. MRI evaluation of bile duct injuries and other post-cholecystectomy complications. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:3086–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Md LM. The Mirizzi syndrome –major cause for biliary duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2017;1 https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2017.01.000308.

  9. Rystedt JML, Wiss J, Adolfsson J, Enochsson L, Hallerbäck B, Johansson P, Jönsson C, Leander P, Österberg J, Montgomery A. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: systematic review, meta-analysis and health economic model analysis of iatrogenic bile duct injury. BJS Open. 2021;5 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa032.

  10. Machi J, Johnson JO, Deziel DJ, Soper NJ, Berber E, Siperstein A, Hata M, Patel A, Singh K, Arregui ME. The routine use of laparoscopic ultrasound decreases bile duct injury: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:384–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aduna M, Larena JA, Martín D, Martínez-Guereñu B, Aguirre I, Astigarraga E. Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:480–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma P, Kumar R, Das KJ, Singh H, Pal S, Parshad R, Bal C, Bandopadhyaya GP, Malhotra A. Detection and localization of post-operative and post-traumatic bile leak: hybrid SPECT-CT with 99mTc-Mebrofenin. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:803–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta RT, Brady CM, Lotz J, Boll DT, Merkle EM. Dynamic MR imaging of the biliary system using hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grazioli L, Olivetti L, Mazza G, Bondioni MP. MR imaging of hepatocellular adenomas and differential diagnosis dilemma. Int J Hepatol. 2013;2013:374170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Médart L, Coibion C, Deflandre J. Hepatobiliary-specific contrast agent in biliary leak. JBR-BTR. 2018;102:58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kantarcı M, Pirimoglu B, Karabulut N, Bayraktutan U, Ogul H, Ozturk G, Aydinli B, Kizrak Y, Eren S, Yilmaz S. Non-invasive detection of biliary leaks using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2713–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW, Lee SH, Kang DH, Kim GH, Seo HI. Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics. 2009;29:1707–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dandekar U, Dandekar K, Chavan S. Right hepatic artery: a cadaver investigation and its clinical significance. Anat Res Int. 2015;2015:412595.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Buell JF, Cronin DC, Funaki B, Koffron A, Yoshida A, Lo A, Leef J, Millis JM. Devastating and fatal complications associated with combined vascular and bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:703–8. discussion 708–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Madanur MA, Battula N, Sethi H, Deshpande R, Heaton N, Rela M. Pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6:294–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Machado NO, Al-Zadjali A, Kakaria AK, Younus S, Rahim MA, Al-Sukaiti R. Hepatic or cystic artery Pseudoaneurysms following a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: literature review of aetiopathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis and management. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017;17:e135–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Spina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spina, J.C., Orta, R. (2022). Role of Imaging. In: Pekolj, J., Ardiles, V., Glinka, J. (eds) Fundamentals of Bile Duct Injuries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13383-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13383-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13382-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13383-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics