Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selecting the Optimal Clean Energy Projects for Emerging Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clean Energy Investments for Zero Emission Projects

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine the most accurate renewable energy investment alternative for developing economies. In this context, firstly, a very large-scale literature analysis was made. As a result, four different issues were identified that could have an impact on this decision. Financial analysis contributes to the determination of the efficiency of investments. Another factor to be considered in the selection of the optimal clean energy investment is customer satisfaction. Customer expectations should be taken into consideration when making investment decisions. Technological investments are also very important in this process because renewable energy investments involve complex engineering steps. Additional factor to consider in the selection of the most suitable renewable energy investment is personnel quality. By considering these four different factors, a decision-making model is created to identify the most optimal renewable energy alternative. For this ranking, the MAIRCA method based on expert opinion was preferred. The most optimal renewable energy alternative has been determined as geothermal energy. Secondly, biomass was determined as the most suitable renewable energy type. Geothermal energy and biomass energy types were followed by wind, solar and hydroelectricity energy types, respectively. It has been determined that hydroelectricity energy type is the most unsuitable renewable energy type. Considering the results obtained, it would be appropriate for developing countries to prioritize their geothermal energy investments. In this context, the types of risks encountered in this process should be determined. In addition, actions specific to these risk types need to be taken. This will allow the risks to be managed effectively. In this way, it will be possible to increase the performance of geothermal energy investments. One of the most important risks in geothermal energy investments is the damage of water resources. Otherwise, there will be significant reductions in water resources. This situation will cause some problems especially in agricultural production. Insufficient water resources will lead to a decrease in the production of agricultural products. Therefore, it would be appropriate to pay attention to this issue in geothermal energy investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adalı, Z., Dinçer, H., Eti, S., Mikhaylov, A., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Identifying new perspectives on geothermal energy investments. In Multidimensional strategic outlook on global competitive energy economics and finance. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar, I., Kirmani, S., & Jameel, M. (2021). Reliability assessment of power system considering the impact of renewable energy sources integration into grid with advanced intelligent strategies. IEEE Access, 9, 32485–32497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azretbergenova, G., Syzdykov, B., Niyazov, T., Gulzhan, T., & Yskak, N. (2021). The relationship between renewable energy production and employment in European Union Countries: Panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(3), 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde, O. M., Munda, J. L., & Hamam, Y. (2020). A comprehensive state-of-the-art survey on hybrid renewable energy system operations and planning. IEEE Access, 8, 75313–75346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch, Z. A., Tan, Q., Kamran, H. W., Nawaz, M. A., Albashar, G., & Hameed, J. (2022). A multi perspective assessment approach of renewable energy production: Policy perspective analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 2164–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, C., & Fang, C.-L. (2013). Geographical and environmental perspectives for the sustainable development of renewable energy in urbanizing China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 464–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baş, H., & Ersin, İ. (2021). The impact of energy investments on employment: A study on the OECD. In S. Yüksel & H. Dinçer (Eds.), Strategic approaches to energy management (pp. 285–299). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, M. A., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Danish, M. S. S., Pinter, G., Uyeh, D. D., & Stepanova, D. (2022). Economic indicators and bioenergy supply in developed economies: QROF-DEMATEL and random forest models. Energy Reports, 8, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caineng, Z., Bo, X., Huaqing, X., Dewen, Z., Zhixin, G., Ying, W., Luyang, J., Songqi, P., & Songtao, W. (2021). The role of new energy in carbon neutral. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(2), 480–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., Pamucar, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R’AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Karakuş, H. (2021). The role of green sukuk for sustainable energy production. In U. Akkucuk (Ed.), Disruptive technologies and eco-innovation for sustainable development (pp. 42–55). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martinez, L. (2019). Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications., 115, 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2022). Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects. Energy Reports, 8, 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, L., Dinçer, H., Ersin, İ., & Yüksel, S. (2020). IT2 fuzzy-based multidimensional evaluation of coal energy for sustainable economic development. Energies, 13(10), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eti, S. (2021). The use of quantitative methods in investment decisions: A literature review. In H. Dinçer & S. Yüksel (Eds.), Research anthology on personal finance and improving financial literacy (pp. 1–20). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyuboglu, K., & Uzar, U. (2021). Asymmetric causality between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Fresh evidence from some emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 29, 21899–21911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felice, A., Rakocevic, L., Peeters, L., Messagie, M., Coosemans, T., & Camargo, L. R. (2021). An assessment of operational economic benefits of renewable energy communities in Belgium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series., 2042, 1–6. IOP Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridleifsson, I. B. (2001). Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 3(5), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigovic, L., Pamucar, D., Bajic, Z., & Milicevic, M. (2016). The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots. Sustainability, 8(4), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haiyun, C., Zhixiong, H., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, J., Zhou, K., Muhammad, F., Khan, D., Khan, A., Ali, N., & Akhtar, R. (2021). Renewable energy investment and governance in countries along the belt & Road Initiative: Does trade openness matter? Renewable Energy, 180, 1278–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, C., Devrim, Y., & Eryılmaz, S. (2020). On the theoretical distribution of the wind farm power when there is a correlation between wind speed and wind turbine availability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatop, B., Taşkan, B., Adar, E., & Kubat, C. (2021). Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a Fuzzy AHP-EDAS-Fuzzy FMEA approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 151, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Consumption-based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Business Strategy and the Environment., 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2945

  • Kostis, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Knowledge-based energy investments of European economies and policy recommendations for sustainable development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy., 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00972-5

  • Kou, G., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects. Applied Energy, 311, 118680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. X., Wu, Z. X., Dinçer, H., Kalkavan, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Analyzing TRIZ-based strategic priorities of customer expectations for renewable energy investments with interval type-2 fuzzy modeling. Energy Reports, 7, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zhu, S., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Kano-based mapping of innovation strategies for renewable energy alternatives using hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making approach. Energy, 211, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Lv, J., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Karakuş, H. (2021). Selection of renewable energy alternatives for green blockchain investments: A hybrid IT2-based fuzzy modelling. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28, 3687–3701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lively, R. P. (2021). The refinery of today, tomorrow, and the future: A separations perspective. AICHE Journal, 67(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maradin, D. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of renewable energy sources utilization. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(3), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Y., Zhou, R., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Wang, C. (2021). Analysis of inventive problem-solving capacities for renewable energy storage investments. Energy Reports, 7, 4779–4791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey. Renewable Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muruganantham, B., Gnanadass, R., & Padhy, N. P. (2017). Challenges with renewable energy sources and storage in practical distribution systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B., & Yusaf, T. F. (2011). Algae as a sustainable energy source for biofuel production in Iran: A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3870–3876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar, D., Vasin, L., & Lukovac, V. (2014). Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model. In XVI international scientific-expert conference on railway (pp. 89–92). Railcon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risto, T., & Aija, K. (2008). Comparison of electricity generation costs. Lappeenranta: Faculty of Technology. Department of Energy and Environmental Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendstad, L. H., Hagspiel, V., Mikkelsen, W. J., Ravndal, R., & Tveitstøl, M. (2022). The impact of subsidy retraction on European renewable energy investments. Energy Policy, 160, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2004). World History and Energy. Encyclopedia of Energy, 6, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Q., Zhao, X., Liu, H., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Assessing the new product development process for the industrial decarbonization of sustainable economies. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440211067231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Dong, Z., Li, R., & Wang, L. (2022). Renewable energy and economic growth: New insight from country risks. Energy, 238, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Hu, M., Liao, M., Liu, F., & Xu, C. (2021). Risk assessment of renewable energy-based island microgrid using the HFLTS-cloud model method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284(15), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, G., Xie, F., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)-based strategic mapping of green nuclear energy investments with spherical fuzzy group decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(8), 12284–12300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Identifying the strategic priorities of nuclear energy investments using hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 145, 104103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Çağlayan, Ç., Uluer, G. S., & Lisin, A. (2022). Bitcoin mining with nuclear energy. In Multidimensional strategic outlook on global competitive energy economics and finance. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Mikhaylov, A., Adalı, Z., & Eti, S. (2022). Key issues for the improvements of shallow geothermal investments. In Sustainability in energy business and finance (pp. 183–194). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects. Energy, 248, 123561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Xu, Y., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2021). Hybrid IT2 fuzzy modelling with alpha cuts for hydrogen energy investments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(13), 8835–8851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhe, L., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Mukhtarov, S., & Azizov, M. (2021). The positive influences of renewable energy consumption on financial development and economic growth. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, D., & Li, Z. (2018). Environmental aspects of high-temperature conversion of petroleum-based fuels. Petroleum Science and Technology, 36(15), 1120–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vocational School, İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Serkan Eti

Authors
  1. Serkan Eti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Eti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Business and Management, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Hasan Dinçer

  2. Business and Management, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Serhat Yüksel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eti, S. (2022). Selecting the Optimal Clean Energy Projects for Emerging Economies. In: Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S. (eds) Clean Energy Investments for Zero Emission Projects. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12958-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation