Skip to main content

Unsupervised Features Ranking via Coalitional Game Theory for Categorical Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13428))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Not all real-world data are labeled, and when labels are not available, it is often costly to obtain them. Moreover, as many algorithms suffer from the curse of dimensionality, reducing the features in the data to a smaller set is often of great utility. Unsupervised feature selection aims to reduce the number of features, often using feature importance scores to quantify the relevancy of single features to the task at hand. These scores can be based only on the distribution of variables and the quantification of their interactions. The previous literature, mainly investigating anomaly detection and clusters, fails to address the redundancy-elimination issue. We propose an evaluation of correlations among features to compute feature importance scores representing the contribution of single features in explaining the dataset’s structure.

Based on Coalitional Game Theory, our feature importance scores include a notion of redundancy awareness making them a tool to achieve redundancy-free feature selection. We show that the deriving features’ selection outperforms competing methods in lowering the redundancy rate while maximizing the information contained in the data. We also introduce an approximated version of the algorithm to reduce the complexity of Shapley values’ computations.

C. Balestra—This research was supported by the research training group Dataninja (Trustworthy AI for Seamless Problem Solving: Next Generation Intelligence Joins Robust Data Analysis) funded by the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first 50 features in the Big Five dataset are the categorical answers to the personality test’s questions and are divided into 5 personalities’ traits (10 questions for each personality trait). To apply the full algorithm, we select questions from different personalities and restrict to 10000 instances.

  2. 2.

    We restrict to the 5000 highest-rated players by the overall attribute.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/chiarabales/unsupervised_sv.

References

  1. Burgess, M.A., Chapman, A.C.: Approximating the Shapley value using stratified empirical Bernstein sampling. In: IJCAI (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cai, D., Zhang, C., He, X.: Unsupervised feature selection for multi-cluster data. In: KDD (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castro, J., Gómez, D., Tejada, J.: Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling. Comput. Oper. Res. 36, 1726–1730 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Catav, A., et al.: Marginal contribution feature importance - an axiomatic approach for explaining data. In: ICML (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, C.-H., Fu, A., Zhang, F.: Entropy-based subspace clustering for mining numerical data. In: KDD (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, S., Dror, G., Ruppin, E.: Feature selection via coalitional game theory. Neural Comput. 19, 1939–1961 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory (Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing). Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, X., Cai, D., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian score for feature selection. In: NIPS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lazo, A.V., Rathie, P.: On the entropy of continuous probability distributions. Trans. Inf. Theory 24(1), 120–122 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J., et al.: Feature selection: a data perspective. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Z., Yang, Y., Liu, J., Zhou, X., Lu, H.: Unsupervised feature selection using nonnegative spectral analysis. In: AAAI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, Y., Cohen, I., Zhou, X.S., Tian, Q.: Feature selection using principal feature analysis. In: MM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.-I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: NIPS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, H., Müller, E., Vreeken, J., Keller, F., Böhm, K.: CMI: an information-theoretic contrast measure for enhancing subspace cluster and outlier detection. In: SDM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pfannschmidt, K., Hüllermeier, E., Held, S., Neiger, R.: Evaluating tests in medical diagnosis: combining machine learning with game-theoretical concepts. In: Carvalho, J.P., Lesot, M.-J., Kaymak, U., Vieira, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2016. CCIS, vol. 610, pp. 450–461. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Reshef, D., et al.: Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334, 1518–1524 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rozemberczki, B., et al.: The Shapley value in machine learning (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shapley, L.S.: A value for N-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shekar, A.K., Bocklisch, T., Sánchez, P.I., Straehle, C.N., Müller, E.: Including multi-feature interactions and redundancy for feature ranking in mixed datasets. In: Ceci, M., Hollmén, J., Todorovski, L., Vens, C., Džeroski, S. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10534, pp. 239–255. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Solorio-Fernández, S., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F.: A review of unsupervised feature selection methods. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53(2), 907–948 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09682-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Strumbelj, E., Kononenko, I.: An efficient explanation of individual classifications using game theory. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1–18 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. van Campen, T., Hamers, H., Husslage, B., Lindelauf, R.: A new approximation method for the Shapley value applied to the WTC 9/11 terrorist attack. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 8, 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vergara, J.R., Estévez, P.A.: A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information. Neural Comput. Appl. 24(1), 175–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1368-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, S., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Embedded unsupervised feature selection. In: AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, Y., Shen, H., Ma, Z., Huang, Z., Zhou, X.: \(l_{2,1}\)-norm regularized discriminative feature selection for unsupervised learning. In: IJCAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, Z., Liu, H.: Spectral feature selection for supervised and unsupervised learning. In: ICML (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, X., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Tan, Y., Wang, G., Song, Q.: A new unsupervised feature selection algorithm using similarity-based feature clustering. Comput. Intell. 35, 2–22 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Balestra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional Material

Additional Material

(See Fig. 5 and Table 5).

Fig. 5.
figure 5

Log-log plot of the run-time for the full SVFS with \(\epsilon =0.5\) as a function of the number of the samples D and fixed number of features.

Table 5. Summary of the datasets’ structures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balestra, C., Huber, F., Mayr, A., Müller, E. (2022). Unsupervised Features Ranking via Coalitional Game Theory for Categorical Data. In: Wrembel, R., Gamper, J., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13428. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12670-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12670-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12669-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12670-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics