Abstract
For deep-rooted historical reasons (the long-standing alliance between England and Portugal), and in the light of a recent string of natural calamities that had afflicted the country in the 1750s, the 1755 Lisbon earthquake had a particularly deep resonance in Britain. This disaster of unprecedented proportion led to much soul-searching, as dozens of sermons poured from the pulpits before going into print. The standard interpretation (or “improvement”, in the language of the time) was that the Lisbon earthquake should be viewed as a divine visitation on the Portuguese, but also as a final warning of the Almighty against sinful Britain. Yet this interpretation did not triumph entirely unopposed; within the sermons themselves, the rival languages of natural philosophy and religion vied for supremacy, thereby revealing the existence of an intellectual fault line. The negotiation between those two types of language took various forms, as is shown in this study of three different sermons on the topic of the Lisbon earthquake.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This particular passage was quoted and commented on in all the sermons I looked into, and was often taken as the text itself, as is indeed the case with Thomas Alcock (see below).
- 2.
‘Our Lord tells us, in the Chapter in which he speaks of his second Coming, and answers the Disciples Enquiry about the Signs of his Coming, and the End of the World, that we should hear of Wars and Rumours of Wars’ (Gibbons 1755, 23). The references are to Matthew 24:6,7; Luke 21:25–27.
- 3.
‘Thus we have given the Reader an Abstract of the different Sentiments of those who have endeavoured to found the Theory of Earthquakes, upon the Principles of natural Philosophy, as they appeared from the abstracted Speculations of the Learned, and as confirmed by Chymical and other experimantal Proofs, on the one Hand, and of those, on the other Hand, who apprehend they can from the later, and more curious Discoveries of Electricity, assign Causes more suitable to the general Laws of Nature, and more adequate to the stupendous Effects of these astonishing Phaenomena’ (Hunter 1756, 14).
- 4.
‘And as from Speculation or Experience nothing has yet appeared to induce us to believe, that these Concussions are the orderly Produce of any Set of natural Causes, or that they have any Tendency to preserve the Consistence, Beauty, or Convenience of the mundane Frame; may we not rather think they are, by the great Author of Nature, order’d to be serviceable in the Government of the moral World, and to be Evidences of the immediate Agency of the Almighty, and the Interest he gives himself in the Kingdom of Providence, and for Instruments of Judgment against such Places as are guilty of the most aggravated Offences against, and Provocations of the most High? And especially as he hath been pleased, in the Revelation he hath made of his Will to Mankind, to declare this to be the Design and Intention of such uncommon and preternatural Events, in Order to preserve that lawful Regard of moral Agents, for the great Author, Founder and Governor of the Universe, which is of absolute Necessity to cultivate an universal Obedience to his Laws, and the Practice of that Virtue which is so visibly, essentially necessary to the Welfare and Happiness of intelligent Agents’ (Hunter 1756, 109–110).
- 5.
‘1 There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilæans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. 2 And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilæans were sinners above all the Galilæans, because they suffered such things? 3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. 4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem? 5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish’.
- 6.
‘All the world is subject to the same fate. If it has not yet suffered from earthquake, it may: perchance this spot on which you stand in full security will be rent this night, or even this day before night’ (1910, 224).
- 7.
To take a cue from the wisdom of Ian Fleming in Goldfinger: ‘Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action’.
- 8.
‘supposing Earthquakes to be divine Judgments, as oftentimes, no doubt, they are, Cities may be most visited, as being generally most wicked. For Cities abound most with Wealth, the Means of Luxury, Vice, and Corruption; and commonly most indulge in them. Beside that Cities are Places of Resort for all the Scum of the Land: The Idle, the Vagrant, the Pick-pocket, Thieves, Whores, and Beggars as naturally flocking to such Places, as Eagles do to a Carcass—’ (Hunter 1756, 18–19).
- 9.
‘But, I say, notwithstanding all the Evils that Earthquakes and Vulcanos are naturally productive of, they are preventive of greater. […] But if the explosive Matter of Earthquakes did not every now and then, at different Times, discharge itself in smaller Portions, by these local Eruptions, but were retained and collected in large Quantities at greater Depths, its Force would become so enormous and irresistible, that the whole Globe of the Earth, like a Shell or Bomb full of Powder, would be split to the Centre, would be burst and torn to Pieces, and all the Inhabitants perish in the bottomless Gulphs’ (Hunter 1756, 19–20).
- 10.
‘The pestilential Fever at Rouen in Normandy about two Years ago seemed justly supposed to be owing to a thick sulphureous Fog’ (Hunter 1756, 24).
- 11.
‘une éthique de la finitude’.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Alcock, Thomas. A Sermon on the Late Earthquakes, More Particularly That at Lisbon, Oxford, R. Baldwin and Th. Rhodes, 1756.
Gibbons, Thomas. A Sermon Preached at Haberdasher’s-Hall, November 30th, London, J. Buckland, J. Ward, T. Field and M. King, 1755.
Hooke, Robert. Lectures and Discourses of Earthquakes, in The Posthumous Works of Dr. Robert Hooke, London, Publish’d by Richard Waller, R.S. Secr., Printed by S. Smith and B. Walford, Printers of the Royal Society, 1705.
Hunter, Thomas. An Historical Account of Earthquakes, Extracted from the most Authentick Historians, Liverpool, R. Williamson and J. Barber, 1756.
Seneca. Quaestiones Naturales, Liber VI, ‘De Terrae Motu’, in Physical Science in the Time of Nero: Being a Translation of the Quaestiones Naturales of Seneca, by John Clarke, M.A., with notes on the Treatise by Sir Archibald Geikie, London, Macmillan, 1910.
Secondary Sources
Araújo, Ana Cristina. ‘The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755—Public Distress and Political Propaganda’, E-Journal of Portuguese History, Vol. 4, N°1, 2006, 1–11.
Carvalhão Buescu, Helena. ‘Seeing Too Much: The 1755 Earthquake in Literature’, European Review, Vol. 14, N°3, 2006, 329–38.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. ‘De Lisbonne (1755) à Sumatra (2005), sur le mal, nous n’avons rien appris’, Esprit, N° 314, mai 2005, 13–24.
Fisher, H. E. S. ‘Anglo-Portuguese Trade, 1700-1770’, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 16, N°2, 1963, 219–33.
Gagnebin, Laurent. ‘Jean-Jacques Rousseau théologien ou les chemins du réalisme: le problème du mal’, Bulletin de la Société de l’Histoire du Protestantisme Français, Vol. 124, octobre-novembre-décembre 1978, 531–51.
Ingram, Robert J. ‘“The Trembling Earth Is God’s Herald”: Earthquake, Religion and Public Life in Britain during the 1750s’, in Theodore E. D. Braun and John B. Radner (eds.), The Lisbon Eathquake of 1755: Representations and Reactions, Oxford, Voltaire Foundation, 2005, 97–115.
Molesky, Mark. ‘A New Account of the Lisbon Earthquake: Marginalia in Joaquim José Moreita de Mendonça’s Historia Universal dos Terremotos’, Portuguese Studies, Vol. 26, N°2, 2010, 232–48.
Molesky, Mark. ‘The Vicar and the Earthquake’, E-Journal of Portuguese History, Vol. 10, N°2, 2012, 76–94.
Molesky, Mark. This Gulf of Fire: The Great Lisbon Earthquake, or Apocalypse in the Age of Science and Reason, New York, Vintage Books, [2015–2016].
Neiman, Susan. ‘We Don’t Have Thirty Years: Reflections on the Lisbon Earthquake’, Philosophical Readings, N°3, Autumn/Winter 2012, 35–41.
Pereira, Alvaro S. ‘The Opportunity of a Disaster: The Economic Impact of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 69, N°2, 2009, 466–99.
Quenet, Grégory. ‘Fléaux de Dieu ou catastrophes naturelles?’, Terrain. Anthropologie & Sciences humaines, N°54, 2010, 11–25.
Ritz, Olivier. ‘Les épigraphes latines des premiers historiens de la Révolution française. 1789–1814’, Dix-huitième siècle, N°44, 2012, 581–99.
Rohrbasser, Jean-Marc. ‘Le tremblement de terre de Lisbonne: un mal pour un bien?’, Annales de démographie historique, N° 120, Populations et catastrophes. Aléas naturels, vulnérabilités et politiques publiques 2010/2, 199–215.
Sutton, C. W (revised by Richard S. Tompson). ‘Hunter, Thomas’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004; online ed., May 2009. Date accessed: 7th August 2020.
Thompson, John Handby. ‘Gibbons, Thomas’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004; online ed., May 2009. Date accessed: 19th August 2020.
Woodland, Patrick. ‘Alcock, Thomas’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004; online ed., May 2009. Date accessed: 11th August 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lurbe, P. (2023). ‘Improving This Terrible Visitation’: The Three Thomases and the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. In: Patel, S., Chiari, S. (eds) The Writing of Natural Disaster in Europe, 1500–1826. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12120-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12120-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12119-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12120-3
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)