Abstract
The 1950s in the United Kingdom were marked by social and political reforms, which also led to new conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning. For mathematics, the Association for Teaching Aids in Mathematics, founded in 1952 by Caleb Gattegno and like-minded people, and internationally fostered by the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Teaching, played an important role in this. The 1959 Royaumont Seminar served as a booster for curriculum change in the UK, bringing in influences from the continent as well as from the United States of America. In its wake, several projects with accompanying textbooks and in-service teacher training programs emerged in the early 1960s. Most influential were the School Mathematics Project for secondary education and the Nuffield Mathematics Project for primary education, projects that were also implemented, in part and/or adapted, in some countries outside the UK. From the 1970s onward, criticism of the reform reverberated more loudly and led to the fall of the new mathematics paradigm in the UK.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
As a result of the Robbins report on Higher Education of 1963 (Committee on Higher Education 1963), teacher-training institutions were reformed as Colleges of Education, and “teacher education” became the terminology signifying both a wider range and a greater intellectual status of studies.
- 2.
The Bachelor of Education degree was first established in 1964 after pressure from the professional associations and the teachers’ unions for an all-graduate teaching profession, and the first teachers graduated under this system in 1968.
- 3.
The Labour (socialist) Government elected after World War II (1945–1951) enacted radical Keynesian policies and after a period in opposition returned for a further term (1964–1970). They began the conversion of state secondary schools to the comprehensive system in 1965.
- 4.
The Schools Council for Curriculum and Examinations (1964–1984) was a quasi-autonomous organization funded by the government and set up to encourage and support curriculum development.
- 5.
The Nuffield Foundation was an independent charity with a mission to advance educational opportunity and social well-being by funding research and innovation in education, justice, and welfare.
- 6.
For a detailed account of the history of the Mathematical Association, its teaching reports, social contexts and its dealings with other organizations, see Price (1994).
- 7.
Many comprehensive schools adopted the practice of “streaming” pupils into “able” and “less able” classes using standard arithmetic tests.
- 8.
Statistics at this time consisted of some basic ideas of means, standard deviation and cumulative frequency, and this, together with a separate paper on Arithmetic, was available as an easy alternative to the full Mathematics examinations at age 16.
- 9.
The first government qualifications were established in 1846, initially for training Primary teachers, and training institutions were established as a consequence of the Education Act of 1870. From 1902, teacher training colleges and university departments trained women and men for Primary and Secondary schools. However, it was still possible to find teachers in Secondary schools without any training (Nunn 1951).
- 10.
The National Froebel Foundation began publishing pamphlets on Piaget’s work in 1955.
- 11.
Gattegno was “spiritus mentor” of CIEAEM. See http://www.cieaem.org/?q=node/18 and http://www.icmihistory.unito.it/19371954.php. Lucienne Félix’s (1985) account of the period 1950–1985 can be downloaded.
- 12.
The School Mathematics Study Group (SMSG), founded in 1958, was the largest and best financed of all the National Science Foundation projects of the era, by the combined efforts of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Association of America, and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (see also Chap. 2 in this volume).
- 13.
Nathan and Susan Isaacs were some of the first to introduce Piagetian ideas to Primary Teachers in 1955 through the National Froebel Foundation.
- 14.
Significantly, Gattegno (1954a) was the first person in the UK to highlight the importance of mathematical structures in the confrontation of mistakes in classroom mathematics. Also, the importance of these ideas could not reach the majority of Secondary Modern teachers, since they were not members of the MA.
- 15.
Roland Collins was a teacher at Doncaster Training College and the author of Mathematical Pie, a periodical for school pupils.
- 16.
In this paper he suggested the whole of geometry could be taught by this means.
- 17.
More information about the Nuffield Primary Mathematics Project can also be found at http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/nuffield-primary-mathematics-1964
- 18.
At the time this project was set up, there were many “middle schools” in England, for pupils aged 9 to 13—this was a result of the freedom of the LEAs to organize their own provisions of education.
- 19.
Edith Biggs (1911–2002) was appointed Her Majesty’s Inspector in 1950, and until the publication of her report, all documents issued by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate were anonymous. Obituary: Mathematics Teaching, 180, 2002, p. 33.
- 20.
Geoffrey Sillitto, who died in 1966, was a lecturer at Jordanhill College of Education in Glasgow, a key member of ATM and a promoter of the Scottish Mathematics Group (see, e.g., Rogers 2014).
- 21.
The first volume (Book A) was published in June 1968 and Book B in October 1968 with further books of the series planned for publication at six monthly intervals (Breakell 2001).
References
ATM. (1966). The development of mathematical activity in children: The place of the problem in this development. Nelson, United Kingdom: Author.
ATM. (1967). Notes on mathematics in primary schools. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
ATM. (1970). Mathematical reflections. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
ATM. (1977). Notes on mathematics for children. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
ATM. (2004). An account of the first decade of AT(A)M. Derby, United Kingdom: Author. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from http://www.atm.org.uk/about/first-decade.html.
Biggs, E. E. (1965). Mathematics in primary schools (Curriculum Bulletin No. 1). London, United Kingdom: The Schools Council.
Bjarnadóttir, K. (2020). Royaumont’s aftermath in Iceland—Motion geometry, transformations and groups. In É. Barbin, K. Bjarnadóttir, F. Furinghetti, A. Karp, G. Moussard, J. Prytz, & G. Schubring (Eds.), “Dig where you stand” 6. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–86). Münster, Germany: WTM.
Breakell, J. (2001). The teaching of mathematics in schools in England and Wales during the early years of the Schools Council 1964 to 1975. Unpublished DPhil thesis, Institute of Education, University of London, United Kingdom.
Brown, M. (2014). The Cockcroft Report: Time past, time present and time future. Mathematics Teaching, 243, 5–9.
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts (Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools). London, United Kingdom: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Higher education: Report (Cmnd 2154). London, United Kingdom: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Cooper, B. (1982). Innovation in English secondary school mathematics: A sociological account with special reference to SMP and MME. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.
Cooper, B. (1985). Renegotiating secondary school mathematics. A study of curriculum change and stability. London, United Kingdom: Falmer Press.
De Bock, D., & Zwaneveld, B. (2020). From Royaumont to Lyon: Applications and modelling during the sixties. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. E. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making (pp. 407–417). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Félix, L. (1985). Aperçu historique sur la Commission Internationale pour l’Étude et l’Amélioration de l’Enseignement des Mathématiques (CIEAEM). [Historical overview (1950–1984) on the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Teaching (CIEAEM)]. Bordeaux, France: l’IREM de Bordeaux.
Fyfe, H. W. (1947). Secondary education: A report of the advisory council on education in Scotland. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Fletcher, T. J. (Ed.). (1964). Some lessons in mathematics: A handbook on the teaching of “modern” mathematics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, T. J. (1972). Linear Algebra; through its applications. London, United Kingdom: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gattegno, C. (1947). Mathematics and the child. The Mathematical Gazette, 31(296), 219–223.
Gattegno, C. (1949). Mathematics and the child, II. The Mathematical Gazette, 33(304), 108–112.
Gattegno, C. (1954a). Mathematics and the child, III. The Mathematical Gazette, 38(323), 11–14.
Gattegno, C. (1954b). The idea of dynamic patterns in geometry. The Mathematical Gazette, 38(325), 207–209.
Gattegno, C. (1963). Perception and action as bases of mathematical thought. In For the Teaching of Mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 49–59). Reading, United Kingdom: Educational Explorers.
HMI. (1958). Branch Reports. Mathematical Gazette, 42(341), i–vi.
Hope, C. (1958). Filmstrips in mathematics. Mathematics Teaching, 6, 11–13.
Howson, A. G. (Ed.). (1964). Book T. The School Mathematics Project. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Howson, A. G. (Ed.). (1965). Book T4. The School Mathematics Project. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Howson, A. G. (Ed.). (1967). Advanced mathematics. Book 1. The School Mathematics Project. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Howson, A. G. (1978). Change in mathematics education since the late 1950s—Ideas and realization: Great Britain. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(2), 183–223.
Karp, A. (2008). Interview with Geoffrey Howson. International Journal for the History of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 47–67.
Kilpatrick, J., & Wirszup, I. (Eds.). (1969–1972). Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (6 Vols.). Stanford, CA: School Mathematics Study Group.
Kline, M. (1973). Why Johnny can’t add: The failure of the New Math. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Ling, J. (1987). SMP activity in the 11–16 sector: 1961–86. In A. G. Howson (Ed.), Challenges and responses in mathematics (pp. 34–48). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
MA. (1947). The place of visual aids in the teaching of mathematics. The Mathematical Gazette, 31(296), 193–205.
MA. (1956). The teaching of mathematics in primary schools. London, United Kingdom: Bell & Sons.
MA. (1959). Mathematics in secondary modern schools. London, United Kingdom: Bell & Sons.
MA. (1964). A second report on the teaching of arithmetic in schools. London, United Kingdom: Bell & Sons.
Moon, B. (1986). The “New Maths” curriculum controversy: An international story. Barcombe, United Kingdom: Falmer Press.
Nunn, T. P. (1951). The training of the teacher. The Mathematical Gazette, 35(311), 41–43.
OEEC. (1961a). New thinking in school mathematics. Paris, France: OEEC.
OEEC. (1961b). Synopses for modern secondary school mathematics. Paris, France: OEEC.
Piaget, J., Beth, E. W., Dieudonné, J., Lichnerowicz, A., Choquet, G., & Gattegno, C. (1955). L’enseignement des mathématiques [The teaching of mathematics]. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Pinner, M. T. Sr. (1981). Mathematics: Its challenge to primary school teachers from 1930–1980. In A. Floyd (Ed.), Developing mathematical thinking (pp. 12–25). London, United Kingdom: Adison-Wesley in association with Open University Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Price, M. H. (1994). Mathematics for the multitude? A history of the Mathematical Association. Leicester, United Kingdom: Mathematical Association.
Rogers, L. (1999). Conflict and compromise: The evolution of the mathematics curriculum in nineteenth century England. In P. Radelet-De Grave (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third European Summer University on History and Epistemology in Mathematical Education (Vol. 1, pp. 309–319). Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Université Catholique de Louvain.
Rogers, L. (2014). Mathematics education in the United Kingdom: Scotland. In A. Karp & G. Schubring (Eds.), Handbook on the history of mathematics education (pp. 269–282). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
Rogers, L. (2017). New conceptions of mathematics and research into learning and teaching: Curriculum projects for primary and secondary schools in the UK (1960–1979). In K. Bjarnadóttir, F. Furinghetti, M. Menghini, J. Prytz, & G. Schubring (Eds.), “Dig where you stand” 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 325–347). Rome, Italy: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
Rogers, L. (2019). An appreciation of Trevor Fletcher: 1922–April 14, 2018. Mathematics Teaching, 266, 44–45.
Schubring, G. (2017). Mathematics teaching in the process of decolonisation. In K. Bjarnadóttir, F. Furinghetti, M. Menghini, J. Prytz, & G. Schubring (Eds.), “Dig where you stand” 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 349–367). Rome, Italy: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
Servais, W. (1970). The significance of concrete materials in the teaching of mathematics. In Association of Teachers of Mathematics, Mathematical reflections. Contributions to mathematical thought and teaching, written in the memory of A. G. Sillitto (pp. 203–208). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Servais, W. (1975). Continental traditions and reforms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 6(1), 37–58.
Simon, B., & Simon, J. (Eds.). (1963). Educational psychology in the USSR. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Swan, F. J. (1950). Mathematics in the comprehensive school. The Mathematical Gazette, 34(309), 182–197.
Thwaites, B. (1966). Mathematical reforms in English secondary schools. The Mathematics Teacher, 59(1), 42–52.
Thwaites, B. (1972). The school mathematics project: The first ten years. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Vanpaemel, G., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Defining modern mathematics: Willy Servais (1913–1979) and mathematics curriculum reform in Belgium. In K. Bjarnadóttir, F. Furinghetti, J. Matos, & G. Schubring (Eds.), “Dig where you stand” 2. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 485–505). Lisbon, Portugal: New University of Lisbon.
Williams, J. (1971a). Problems and possibilities in the assessment of mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(1), 135–149.
Williams, J. (1971b). Teaching technique in primary maths. Slough, United Kingdom: NFER.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rogers, L. (2023). New Mathematics in the United Kingdom: Projects and Textbooks as Driving Forces of Curriculum Reform. In: De Bock, D. (eds) Modern Mathematics. History of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11166-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11166-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11165-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11166-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)