Skip to main content

Public Theatre Writing Policy in England Since 1945

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Acting on Cultural Policy

Part of the book series: New Directions in Cultural Policy Research ((NDCPR))

Abstract

This chapter begins the in-depth case study of new theatre writing policy in England by looking at public theatre writing policies at national, regional and local levels, in terms of both their development by the arts funding system and some of the key debates within the area of new playwriting. The chapter illustrates the multi-faceted nature of playwriting policy, which includes matters related to the financing of new plays and the terms and conditions of writers’ working lives; issues concerned with the development of writers and their plays; and questions about the place of new plays in the repertoire, in particular the association of new work with the notion of risk – an idea that has been persistently challenged by playwrights’ organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As explained in Chap. 1, while the focus of my case study is England, until 1994 the Arts Council’s remit was for Britain as a whole; therefore, much of the national material examined in this chapter covers Britain rather than England only. However, the regional and local dimensions discussed here relate specifically to England.

  2. 2.

    The arm’s length approach is the system by which government keeps a distance from detailed policy and grant-making activities by appointing semi-independent bodies to undertake this work. Applied across public policy as a means of restraining governmental powers, in the cultural field it has been regarded as an important buffer between government and the arts, preventing political interference or diktat in artistic matters.

  3. 3.

    Although arm’s length bodies have been officially titled NDPBs (non-departmental public bodies) since the 1980s, they are still widely referred to by the earlier acronym: ‘quangos’ (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations). As this was also the appellation used in the first period of my case study, it is therefore the term I use in this book.

  4. 4.

    It was the nature of these parameters that caused some criticism of national government policy for the arts, because “it would appear that government objectives are becoming more and more removed from the arts, more of what the government wants and less of what the arts need” (Quinn, 1997, p.152).

  5. 5.

    Across the whole period of the new writing schemes, which continued until the 2002 Arts Council re-organisation, other measures included grants for commissions, writers’ workshops, second productions, and for theatres to have a resident dramatist on attachment. There were also bursaries and commission grants for theatre translators and annual ‘best play’ awards.

  6. 6.

    “The Council will look to the companies concerned to play a full part in arranging activities beyond the staging of productions in their own main houses […] for example, expanded seasons of studio work (with particular emphasis on new writing)” (ACGB, 1984, p.16).

  7. 7.

    Enquiry reports do not necessarily represent the official view of the Arts Council itself. The critical verdict of the Theatre Is For All report, and of other commentators, is not reflected in the Arts Council’s own assessment of The Glory of the Garden (ACGB, 1989), which asserted that “the successes greatly outweigh the failures” (p.2).

  8. 8.

    While the Arts Council’s additional £25m was seen as a vital component in this development, Anne Millman and Jodi Myers offer the caveat that other funding streams, such as Lottery grants and European Union funding, were also likely to have contributed to it (Millman & Myers, 2009, p.21).

  9. 9.

    Some of these documents were collected by the author during research for an earlier, unpublished, report on British theatre policy (Woddis, 1997) and were then added to in 1998 and 1999 at the start of the main research period for this study.

  10. 10.

    Interview by the author, July 1999.

  11. 11.

    Theatre Writers’ Union Newsletter, September , 1982, [p.26].

  12. 12.

    ‘Fighting to Save the Swan’, Staging Post, Winter 2002, Issue 19, p.1.

  13. 13.

    Documents in Archive of North West Playwrights, NWP 2/1/1/2.

  14. 14.

    Telephone interview by the author, May 1997, during research for the previously mentioned report on British theatre policy (Woddis, 1997).

  15. 15.

    TWU Newsletter, May 1983, p.1.

  16. 16.

    TWU internal notes of meeting with TMA, 23rd November 1983.

  17. 17.

    TWU News Sheet, [December 1983], [p.3].

  18. 18.

    TWU News Sheet 5, [April 1984], [p.11].

  19. 19.

    Interview in TWU Newsletter, Summer 1994, p.7.

  20. 20.

    ‘Playwrights demand more time in the theatres for new work’, The Guardian, 21st November 1994, p.21.

  21. 21.

    Staging Post Issue 5, New Year 1999, p.2.

  22. 22.

    Stagecoach! Organising Committee, Report of Stagecoach! 1992, June 1992, p.16 (West Midlands Theatre Writers’ Union).

  23. 23.

    Newscript (newsletter of Yorkshire Playwrights) November 1998, p.[2].

  24. 24.

    [Drama Panel Working Party], Background to the Theatre Writing Strategy, 1999, p.19. (ACE, unpublished paper.)

  25. 25.

    In fact, after pressure from the region’s theatre community, West Midlands RAB continued Stagecoach!’s funding while it reorganised itself. The new organisation, Script, was then also funded by the RAB.

  26. 26.

    Kevin Mandry and Anthony Pickthall (eds) [n.d.], Theatre Writers Union Members Guide, p.10.

  27. 27.

    Theatre Writers’ Union and Writers’ Guild of Great Britain, The New Writing Fund: A proposal to the Arts Council of England, 1995.

  28. 28.

    Article in The Times, 8th December 1982.

  29. 29.

    Peter Hall interviewed by Chris Barlas in Gambit, 1976, Vol.7, No.28, p.25.

  30. 30.

    Ben Payne, Literary Manager, ‘Opening The Door’, in Birmingham Repertory Theatre, Open The Door, Issue 1, Summer 2001.

References

  • All Party Parliamentary Writers Group (2021) Supporting Writers Through the COVID-19 Crisis. https://allpartywritersgroup.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/APWG_Supporting_Writers_Through_the_Covid_19_Crisis.pdf (accessed 23/6/2021).

  • Arts Council England (2003) Theatre Writing Strategy. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council England (2006) Theatre Policy. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council England (2009) theatre assessment. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council England (2016) Analysis of Theatre in England: A Strategic Overview. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Analysis%20of%20Theatre%20in%20England%20report%20-%20Arts%20Council%20response.pdf (accessed 23/11/2021).

  • Arts Council England (2020) Let’s Create. Strategy 2020–2030. Manchester: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (1995) Annual Report. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (1996a, 2nd ed’n) The arts funding system: An introduction to the components of the UK arts funding system. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (1996b) The Policy for Drama of the English Arts Funding System. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (2000a) Artstat: Digest of Arts, Statistics and Trends in the UK 1986/87–1997/98. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (2000b) The Next Stage: Towards a National Policy for Theatre in England. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (2000c) The Arts Council’s National Policy for Theatre in England. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of England (2000d) Working for the Arts. Annual review 2000. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1947, 1948, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1956, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1965, 1967, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1993a) Annual Report and Accounts. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1970) The Theatre Today in England and Wales: The Report of the Arts Council Theatre Enquiry. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1984) The Glory of the Garden: The Development of the Arts in England – A Strategy for a Decade. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1986) Theatre Is For All: Report of the Enquiry into Professional Theatre in England under the chairmanship of Sir Kenneth Cork. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1989) Glory Reflected: A Progress Report on ‘The Glory of the Garden’. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1992) Towards a National Arts and Media Strategy. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council of Great Britain (1993) A Creative Future: The way forward for the arts, crafts and media in England. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, Mark and Kate Oakley (2015) ‘UK Art Workers, Class, and the Myth of Mobility’, in Maxwell, Richard (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Labor and Media. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, Paul (ed.) (1991) Drama. National Arts and Media Strategy Discussion Document. London: Arts Council of Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billington, Michael (1996) Theatre is alive – official. The Guardian, 28th December 1996, p.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Jacqueline (2012) Capitalizing (on) new writing: New play development in the 1990s. Studies in Theatre & Performance, Vol.32, No. 2, pp.209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Alun and Sue Roberts (1998) Evaluation of local authority arts policies. London: Arts Council of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, Chris (2004) Editorial. The Lowdown, No. 53, January-March 2004, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Theatre Consortium (2009) Writ Large. New Writing on the English Stage 2003–2009. [n.p.]: BTC.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Theatre Consortium, SOLT/UKTheatre and BON Culture (2016) British Theatre Repertoire 2014, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/513c543ce4b0abff73bc0a82/t/57347c792b8dde48ff9c18e1/1463057537574/British+Theatre+Repertoire+2014.pdf.

  • Brook, Orian, David O’Brien, and Mark Taylor (2018) Panic! Social Class, Taste and Inequalities in the Creative Industries. https://createlondon.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Panic-Social-Class-Taste-and-Inequalities-in-the-Creative-Industries1.pdf.

  • Brown, Ian (1984) The Development of Playwrights’ Workshops – a Perspective. BTI/DATEC Reports, British Theatre Institute, Issue No.5, [pp.1–2] (photocopy of article in Archive of North West Playwrights, NWP 1/5/1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ian (1993) Drama: Three-Year Plan 1994–97. London: ACGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ian and Rob Brannen (1996) When Theatre was for All: the Cork Report, after Ten Years. New Theatre Quarterly, Vol.12, No.48, pp.367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cmnd. 2601 (1965) A Policy for the Arts: The First Steps. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conor, Bridget (2014) Screenwriting: Creative labor and professional practice. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creative Access (2020) On The Verge. The impact of coronavirus on underrepresented communities within the creative industries. www.creativeaccess.org.uk.

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (1999a). Guidance for Local Authorities on Local Cultural Strategies: Consultation Draft. [London]: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (1999b). Arts and Sport: Policy Action Team 10 – A Report to the Social Exclusion Unit. [London]: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2000) Creating opportunities: Guidance for Local Authorities in England on Local Cultural Strategies. [London]: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2007) Culture and creativity in 2007. [London]: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2016) The Culture White Paper. [London]: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, David (2013) Playwriting Studies: Twenty Years On. Contemporary Theatre Review, Vol.23, No.2, pp.99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, David (2005) Massive attack. Dramatists should stop fooling around in little black boxes and think big. Really big. The Guardian, 27th June 2005, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/jun/27/theatre (accessed 12/10/2020).

  • Feist, Andy (1996) The professional drama sector in England – a statistical profile. London: Arts Council of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlater, Richard (1973) A Retort to King and Blaug: The Arts Council and Its Critics. Encounter, Vol.XLI, No.6, pp.91–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freelancers Make Theatre Work (2020) COVID-19: Routes to Recovery – an evidence-based study of the freelance theatre workforce. https://freelancersmaketheatrework.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Routes-To-Recovery.pdf (accessed 3/12/2020).

  • Gray, Clive (2000) The Politics of the Arts in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater Manchester Combined Authority (2019) Grown in Greater Manchester. Known Around the World: Greater Manchester’s Strategy for Culture and Creativity. Manchester: GMCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Adrian (2016) Funding Arts and Culture in a Time of Austerity. London: New Local Government Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, Robert (1985) Case of the disappearing playwrights, Sunday Times, 26th May 1985, p.41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, Robert (1995) Culture and Consensus: England, art and politics since 1940. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Robert (1982) The Politics of the Arts Council. London: Sinclair Browne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itzin, Catherine (1980) Stages in the Revolution: Political Theatre in Britain Since 1968. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffri, Joan (2005) After the Ball is Over. Career transition for dancers around the world. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.11, No.3, pp.341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jongh, Nicholas (1985) Theatre revolt over ‘political’ Arts Council, The Guardian, 1st March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, Nobuko (1997) Local authorities and cultural policy: dynamics of recent developments. Local Government Policy Making, Vol.23, No.5, pp.31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Anthony (1983) Introduction. Journal of Management and Law, Vol.13, No.1, pp.7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Fin and Helen Campbell Pickford (2013) In Battalions. A snapshot of new play development in England at the start of 2013. https://www.scribd.com/document/126273288/In-Battalions.

  • Kennedy, Fin and Helen Campbell Pickford (2014) In Battalions Delphi Study. Results of an expert consultation on wyas to protect risk-taking on new work for the stage in an age of austerity. https://www.scribd.com/document/203083584/In-Battalions-Delphi-Study.

  • Keynes, John Maynard (1945) The Arts Council: Its Policy and Hopes. The Listener, July 12th.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Karen and Mark Blaug (1973) Does the Arts Council Know What It Is Doing?: An Inquiry into Public Patronage of the Arts. Encounter, Vol.XLI, No.3, pp.6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Helen (2020) When Will We Want to Be in a Room Full of Strangers Again?, The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/05/theater-survive-coronavirus-art-west-end-broadway/611338/ (accessed 01/11/2021).

  • Local Government Association (2020) Cultural strategy in a box. London: LGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loretto, Andrew and Jenny Wilson (2003) Yorkshire New Writing Review. [n.p.]: Yorkshire Playwrights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangset, Per (2020) The end of cultural policy? International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.26, No.3, pp.398–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Claire (2014) On with the Show: Supporting Local Arts and Culture. London: New Local Government Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, Brian (2008) Supporting Excellence in the Arts. From Measurement to Judgement [n.p.]: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, Angela (2002) Clubs to Companies: Notes on the Decline of Political Culture in Speeded Up Creative Worlds. Cultural Studies, Vol.16, No.4, pp.516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, Angela (2004) ‘Making a Living in London’s Small Scale Creative Sector’, in Dominic Power and Allan J. Scott (eds) Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, Angela (2016) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge, UK and Malden, USA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Pierre-Michel (2001) Artists as workers: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Poetics, Vol.28, pp.241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, Anne and Jodi Myers (2009) ‘theatre assessment findings: data and consultation’, in Arts Council England Theatre assessment 2009. London: ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Catherine and Mirjam Gollmitzer (2012) Escaping the precarity trap: a call for creative labour policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.18, No.4, pp.419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelands, Jonothan, Eliza Easton and Te-Anne Robles (2015) How public investment in arts contributes to growth in the creative industries. [London]: Creative Industries Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • North West Arts Board (1997) A Review of Theatre Provision in the North-West of England. Manchester: NWAB.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Dave and Kate Oakley (2015) Cultural Value and Inequality: A Critical Literature Review. Swindon, Wiltshire: Arts & Humanities Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Economics (2020) The Projected Economic Impact of Covid-19 on the UK Creative Industries. Oxford: Oxford Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Boyden Associates (2000) Roles and Functions of the English Regional Producing Theatres: Final Report. Bristol: Peter Boyden Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Peuter, Greig and Nicole S. Cohen (2015) ‘Emerging labour politics in creative industries’, in Oakley, Kate and Justin O’Connor (eds) The Routledge Companion to the Cultural Industries, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivtseva, Elena (2020) Performing Arts in Times of the Pandemic. Status quo and the way forward. www.ietm.org: IETM.

  • Polivtseva, Elena (2021) Culture, creativity and coronavirus: time for EU action. https://socialeurope.eu/culture-creativity-and-coronavirus-time-for-eu-action (accessed26/08/2021).

  • Quinn, Ruth-Blandina M. (1997) Distance or Intimacy? – The Arm’s Length Principle, the British Government and the Arts Council of Great Britain. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.4, No.1, pp.127–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosavljević, Duška (2013) Theatre-Making: Interplay Between Text and Performance in the 21st Century. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redcliffe-Maud, Lord (1976) Support for the Arts in England and Wales. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees-Mogg, William (1993) Affording art for all, The Times, 15th July 1993, p.16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, Graeme (1995) Starting From Here: Developing a New Writing Strategy for the North. Tyne & Wear: New Playwriting Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Gerry (2000) The Creativity Imperative: Investing in the arts in the 21st century. London: Arts Council of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Liz (2008) Comparative Study of New Writing Support Agencies in the UK. Leeds: Script Yorkshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, Harriet (2022) Theresa May’s local council drops plan to abolish arts funding. The Guardian, 11th February 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2022/feb/11/theresa-may-council-drops-plan-abolish-arts-funding-windsor-maidenhead (accessed 11/2/2022).

  • South East Arts (1996) SEA Policy on Production Funding for Theatre and Drama. Tunbridge Wells: SEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • South West Arts (1997) New Theatre Writing in the South West: An Issues Paper. Exeter: SWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • South West Arts (1998) New Theatre Writing: Policy Guidance and Information. Exeter: SWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeting, Elizabeth (1982) Patron or Paymaster? The arts council dilemma: A conference report. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Andrew (1997) ‘Arm’s Length But Hands On’. Mapping the New Governance: the Department of National Heritage and Cultural Politics in Britain. Public Administration, Vol.75, Autumn, pp.441–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theatre Writers’ Union (1982) Playwrights: An Endangered Species? [London]: TWU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theatre Writers’ Union (1987) Playwrights: A Species Still Endangered? [London]: TWU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unaffiliated group of theatre freelancers (2021) The Big Freelancer Report. https://freelancersmaketheatrework.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Big-Freelancer-Report.pdf (accessed 12/11/2021).

  • Wilson, Jane (2017) Can less really be more? Arts Professional, 13th July 2017. https://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/magazine/306/feature/can-less-really-be-more (accessed 12/03/2021).

  • Witts, Richard (1998) Artist Unknown: An Alternative History of the Arts Council. London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woddis, Jane (1997) ‘New Playwriting’, in Kawashima, Nobuko (ed.), Aspects of Theatre Policy in Britain: a Study of Seven Cases: Policy, Excellence and Innovation in Theatre. (Unpublished report for the Saison Foundation, Tokyo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woddis, Jane (2011) Religious protest and its impact on cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.17, No.2, pp.209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Writers’ Guild of Great Britain (2012) The Working Playwright. Engaging with Theatres. London: WGGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Writers’ Guild of Great Britain (2020) Playwrights and theatres during the closure: guidelines for best practice. London: WGGB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woddis, J. (2022). Public Theatre Writing Policy in England Since 1945. In: Acting on Cultural Policy. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11162-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics