Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Singularity to Complementarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complementarity in Organizations

  • 418 Accesses

Abstract

All business organisations strive for progression, which means movement towards an objective by converting the energy within from latent potential to actual force, and orchestrating assets and resources in support of this movement. In addition, it means development- providing foundations for future growth—by balancing a focus on short term gains with investments that will pay back in the longer term. Progression manifests itself by results—profit, return on investment, or the maximisation of shareholder value and by the successful adaptation to contemporary environments including social objectives -fair- trade practices, contribution to social welfare, respect for and understanding about the environment, diversity, and equality of opportunity. A characteristic of latent potential is that of complementarity in which one capability reinforces the impact of another capability—where the relations of independent units or their evolution creates higher value than their individual operation. Complementarity refers to the interaction of business strategies and practices to produce coherent, aligned and mutually reinforcing systems and processes that give superior outcomes over those that would occur if such strategies or practices had taken place independently of one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlstrad, B., Lampel, J., & Mintzberg, H. (1998). Strategy safari. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, S., Breidahl, E., & Marty, A. (2018). Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement. The Career Development International, 23(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2017-0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alimo-Metcalfe, B., & Alban-Metcalfe, J. (2003, March 16). Under the influence. People Management, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Special Issue: Employee Engagement, Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. (2018). Design rules, volume 2: How technology shapes organisations, Chapter 5 Complementarity. Working Paper 19-036. Harvard Business School, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1929). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Milgrom, P. (2013). Complementarity in organizations. In R. S. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of organisational economics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 10909516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco, S., & Crifo, P. (2014). CSR and financial performance: Complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3323–3338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels, E. G. (1998b). The war for talent. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E. G., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels, E. G., III. (1998a). Win the war for top talent. Workforce, 77(12), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1969). British management thought—A critical analysis. George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIPD. (2017). Employee engagement and motivation. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, UK. https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/engagement/factsheet#6227

  • Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2013). Commentary on: “Talent—innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management”. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 10534822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Vaiman, V. (2015). Talent management progress and prospects. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organisations. Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. Butterworth-Heinemann Edition (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1974). Management, tasks, responsibilities, practices (2011 ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edger, C. (2012). Effective multi-unit leadership: Local leadership in multi-site situations. Gower Applied Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri, S., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2019). Behavioural momentum in hierarchical and non-hierarchical organizations. Behavioural Development, 24(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2006). Why should anyone be led by you. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A., & Furnari, S. (2008). A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design. Organisation Studies, 29(3), 459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), (2010) Leading organisations—Perspectives for a new era. Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and possibilities. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1976). Understanding organisations. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B. D. (1989, November–December). The origin of strategy. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlupic, V. (2014). The management shift. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, B., Kueng, L., & Yang, M. J. (2015). Estimating management practice complementarity between decentralization and performance. NBER Working Paper No. 20845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. F. (2013). Integrating ERP and e-business: Resource complementarity in business value creation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett, M. (2009, August 18). Engagement depends on a clear psychological contract between employee and employer. HR Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Ni, N. (2013). Understanding complementarities as organizational configurations: Using set theoretical methods. In Configurational theory and methods in organizational research 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., McKiernan, P., & Faulkner, D. O. (2006). The history of strategy and some thoughts about the future. In A. Campbell & D. O. Faulkner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilburg, R. R., & Donohue, M. D. (2011). Toward a ‘grand unifying theory’ of leadership: Implications for consulting psychology. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijenbrink, J. (2019). 20 reasons why strategy execution fails. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2019/09/10/20-reasons-why-strategy-execution-fails/?sh=32f836041ebe

  • Lanteri, A. (2021). Strategic drivers for the fourth industrial revolution. Thunderbird International Business Review, 63(3), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenfant, J.-S. (2006). Complementarity and demand theory: From the 1920s to the 1940s. History of Political Economy, 38(Suppl 1), 48–85. Duke University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes, R. (2018). Design discourse for organization design: Foundations in human-centered design. Design Issues, 34(3), 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (2014, January–February). The big lie of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24, 934–948. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2011). Managing. FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, V., Felipe Elias Lobo Vieira da Silva, Ferreira, R., & Filardi, F. (2019). Complementarity as a driver of value in business intelligence and analytics adoption processes. Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia, 18(1), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, J., Gould, A., & McMurray, A. (2020). The Palgrave handbook of management history. Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C., Zhu, Z., & Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2010). Integrating marketing and information services functions: A complementarity and competence perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2020). Humble Pi. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roser, M. (2013). Economic growth. https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth

  • Rumelt, R. (2011). Good strategy, Bad strategy. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2017). Translating employee engagement research into practice. Organizational Dynamics, 46, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1974). Complementarity: An essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 12(4), 1255–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwaelder, T. (2019). 3 reasons good strategies fail. Wall Street Journal. https://deloitte.wsj.com/cmo/2019/12/18/3-reasons-good-strategies-fail

  • Schwarz, T. (2012). New research: How employee engagement hits the bottom line. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2012/11/creating-sustainable-employee.html

  • Sytch, M., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). Collaborative by design? How matrix organizations see/do alliances. Organisation Science, 29(6), 1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, C., et al. (2007). Talent: Strategy, management, measurement. CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2010). Global talent management: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business, 45, 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. A. (2019). Leadership in healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. A. (2020). Employee engagement. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. A. (2021). The making of the modern manager. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Smallwood, N. (2011). What is talent. Michigan Ross School of Business, Executive White Paper Series. execed.bus.umich.edu/execdev/.../dulrich_wp_what_is_talent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R. (2006). Employee engagement and commitment, SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/Employee-Engagement-Commitment.pdf

  • Wilson, J. F., & Thomson, A. (2009). The making of modern management. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2019a). The importance of collaboration in a connected world. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/how-collaboration-is-the-modern-company-s-secret-weapon/

  • World Economic Forum. (2019b). HR4.0: Shaping people strategies in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_NES_Whitepaper_HR4.0.pdf

  • World Economic Forum. (2019c). 3 ways firms can master the digital challenges of the 4IR. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/3-ways-digital-challenges-fourth-industrial-revolution-cybersecurity-ai-artificial-intelligence/

  • Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organisations. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leeds Business School- Associate, Leeds Beckett University-Associate, Leeds, UK

    Paul Turner

Authors
  1. Paul Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, P. (2022). From Singularity to Complementarity. In: Complementarity in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10654-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation