Abstract
This chapter explores the notion of historical awareness in relation to using primary historical sources in the teaching and learning of mathematics. It does so through the analysis of two teaching experiments originally designed from different, yet related perspectives. We present an analytic framework for identifying historical awareness and use it to analyze two cases in order to explore and discuss how and in what sense using primary historical sources in the mathematics classroom have potential to develop students’ historical awareness. Finally, we point toward more general challenges in mathematics education that historical awareness may be suited to address and articulate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We have borrowed the term “multiple perspective approach” from the Danish historian Bernard Eric Jensen (2003).
- 2.
In this respect, the notion of historical awareness has some resemblances with Skovsmose’s (e.g., 2011) notion of “foreground” within critical mathematics education. Yet, Skovsmose’s notion of foreground is embedded in a social context involving students’ hope, despair, uncertainty, etc., whereas historical awareness has to do with the students’ academic foreground.
- 3.
Nine students participated in the interview component of the pilot study.
- 4.
Seven students participated in the seminar. Of these participants, five also participated in the interview.
- 5.
Components of the first case are informed by work supported by the US National Science Foundation [grant number 1523561]. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- 6.
Not all of the seven questions were relevant to the focus of this chapter. In particular, the remaining questions were designed to elicit students’ views on the secondary-tertiary transition.
- 7.
All names in both empirical cases are pseudonyms.
- 8.
KOM is short for ‘Kompetencer og Matematiklæring’, which is Danish for ‘Competencies and Mathematics Learning’.
References
Ashton, P., & Kean, H. (Eds.) (2009). People and their pasts: Public history today. Palgrave Macmillan.
Barnett, J. H., Lodder, J., Pengelley, D., Pivkina, I., & Ranjan, D. (2011). Designing student projects for teaching and learning discrete mathematics and computer science via primary historical sources. In V. Katz & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Recent developments on introducing a historical dimension in mathematics education, MAA Notes 78 (pp. 187–200). The Mathematical Association of America.
Barnett, J. H., Lodder, J., & Pengelley, D. (2014). The pedagogy of primary historical sources in mathematics: Classroom practice meets theoretical frameworks. Science & Education, 23(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9618-1.
Berkeley, G. (1734). The analyst; Or, a discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician. J. R. Tonson and S. Draper.
Boole, G. (1854). An investigation of the laws of thought on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. Walton and Maberly.
Carr, D. (2006). The reality of history. In T. Rockmore & J. Margolis (Eds.), History, historicity and science (pp. 121–136). Ashgate Publishing.
Cauchy, A.-L. (1823). Résumé des leçons données à l’école royale polytechnique sur le calcul infinitésimal. De Bure.
Clark, K. M., Kjeldsen, T. H., Schorcht, S., & Tzanakis, C. (Eds.) (2018). Mathematics, education and history—Towards a harmonious partnership. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer International Publishing.
Danish Ministry of Education (2017). Historie A—STX, august 2017. https://uvm.dk/gymnasiale-uddannelser/fag-og-laereplaner/laereplaner-2017/stxlaereplaner-2017.
Epple, M. (2000). Genies, Ideen, Institutionen, mathematische Werkstätten: Formen der Mathematikgeschichte. Mathematische Semesterberichte, 47, 131–163.
Eriksen, A. & Sigurdsson, J. V. (Eds.) (2009). Negotiating pasts in the Nordic countries. Nordic Academic Press.
Fauvel, J. & van Maanen, J. (Eds.) (2000). History in mathematics education: The ICMI study. Kluwer.
Grigutsch, S. & Törner, G. (1998). World views of mathematics held by university teachers of mathematics science. UD, Fachbereich Mathematik. http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-5249/mathe121998.pdf.
Hamming, R. W. (1980). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87(2), 81–90.
Jankvist, U. T. (2009). A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9174-9.
Jankvist, U. T. (2010). An empirical study on using history as a ‘goal.’ Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 53–74.
Jankvist, U. T. (2011a). Anchoring students’ meta-perspective discussions of history in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 346–385.
Jankvist, U. T. (2011b). Historisk fremkomst og moderne anvendelse af grafteori—et matematikfilosofisk undervisningsforløb til gymnasiet [Historical origins and modern application of graph theory—A mathematical-philosophical teaching module for high school]. Tekster fra IMFUFA, no. 486. Roskilde University.
Jankvist, U. T. (2011c). Historisk fremkomst og moderne anvendelse af Boolsk algebra—et matematikfilosofisk undervisningsforløb til gymnasiet [Historical origins and modern application of Boolean algebra—A mathematical-philosophical teaching module for high school] Tekster fra IMFUFA, no. 487. Roskilde University.
Jankvist, U. T. (2013). History, application and philosophy in mathematics education: HAPh—A use of primary sources. Science & Education, 22(3), 635–656.
Jankvist, U. T. (2014a). On the use of primary sources in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook on research in history, philosophy and science teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 873–908). Springer.
Jankvist, U. T. (2014b). The use of original sources and its potential relation to the recruitment problem. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(3), 8–13.
Jankvist, U. T. (2015). History, application, and philosophy of mathematics in mathematics education: Accessing and assessing students’ overview and judgment. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 383–404). Springer Verlag.
Jankvist, U. T. (2016). On the use of primary historical sources in the teaching and learning of mathematics—Short and long term effects. In A. Beckman, V. Freiman & C. Michelsen (Eds.), Proceedings of MACAS-2015—International Symposium of Mathematics and its Connections to the Arts and Sciences (pp. 6–18). Verlag Franzbecker.
Jankvist, U. T., & van Maanen, J. (2018). History and mathematics education. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, P. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 239–253). Routledge.
Jensen, B. E. (2003). Historie-livsverden og fag [History-life world and subjects]. Gyldendal.
Jensen, B. E. (2010). Hvad er historie [What is history]. Akademisk Forlag.
Jensen, B. E. (2011). At handle i tid og rum. Et socialkonstruktivistisk historiebegreb [To act in time and space. A social constructivist concept of history]. Historisk Tidsskrift, 111(1). https://tidsskrift.dk/historisktidsskrift/article/view/56499.
Kjeldsen, T. H. (2012). Uses of history for the learning of and about mathematics: Towards a theoretical framework for integrating history of mathematics in mathematics education. In È. Barbin, S. Hwang, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), History and Pedagogy of Mathematics (HPM) Satellite Meeting of ICME-12 (pp. 1–21). KSME, ICME-12 and HPM.
Kjeldsen, T. H. (2019). A multiple perspective approach to history of mathematics: Mathematical programming and Rashevsky’s early development of mathematical biology in the twentieth century. In G. Schubring (Ed.), Interfaces between mathematical practices and mathematical education (pp. 143–167). Springer.
Knoebel, A., Laubenbacher, R., Lodder, J., & Pengelley, D. (2007). Mathematical masterpieces—Further chronicles by the explorers. Springer.
Laubenbacher, R., & Pengelley, D. (1999). Mathematical expeditions—Chronicles by the explorers. Springer.
L’Hôpital, G. (1696). Analyse des infiniment petits pour l’intelligence des lignes courbes. Montalant. [Translation by D. J. Struik (1969), in A source book in mathematics, 1200–1800]. Princeton University Press to the Struik reference.
Newton, I. (1704). Tractatus de quadratura curvarum. London. [Translation by D. J. Struik (1969), in A source book in mathematics, 1200–1800]. Princeton University Press.
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (Eds.) (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning—ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. English Edition, October 2011 (IMFUFA tekst no. 485). Roskilde University (published in Danish in 2002).
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9.
Richards, J. L. (1995). The history of mathematics and ‘L’esprit humain’: A critical reappraisal. Osiris, 10, 122–135.
Ruch, D. (2019). An introduction to a rigorous definition of derivative. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/triumphs_analysis/7/.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.
Shannon, C. E. (1938a). A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Shannon, C. E. (1938b). A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits. American Institute of Electrical Engineers Transactions, 57, 713–723.
Shannon, C. E. (1987). Interview Claude Shannon, Omni, August 1987, (pp. 61–66). http://www.housevampyr.com/training/library/books/omni/OMNI_1987_08.pdf.
Skovsmose, O. (2011). An invitation to critical mathematics education. Sense Publishers.
Wigner, E. P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.
Witzke, I., Clark, K., Struve, H. & Stoffels, G. (2018). Addressing the transition from school to university: Evolution of a seminar emphasizing historical sources and student reflections. In K. M. Clark, T. H. Kjeldsen, S. Schorcht & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Mathematics, education and history: Towards a harmonious partnership. ICME-13 Monographs (pp. 61‒82). Springer International Publishing.
Witzke, I., Struve, H., Clark, K. & Stoffels, G. (2016). ÜberPro-A seminar constructed to confront them from school to university mathematics, based on epistemological and historical ideas of mathematics. MENON: Journal of Educational Research (2nd Thematic Issue), 66–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Primary Source Project Tasks 1–7 (Ruch, 2019).
Task 1. Write out the algebraic details of Newton’s fluxion method for n = 3 using modern algebraic notation to find the fluxion of x3. Sketch the curve y = x3 and label the key quantities for Newton’s fluxion method.
Task 2. Convert Newton’s argument that \(\left( {x^n } \right)^{\prime} = nx^{n - 1}\) to one with modern limit notation for the case where n is a positive integer. You may use modern limit laws.
Task 3. What do you think of Berkeley’s criticisms? Is the value of o in Newton’s text both an increment and “not an increment”? How might Newton have responded?
Task 4. Use L’Hˆopital’s definition of a differential, some algebra, and your own words to explain why the differential of xy is \(ydx + xdy + dx \cdot dy.\)
Task 5. What do you think of L’Hôpital’s argument that he could eventually ignore dx dy because it is “a quantity infinitely small, in respect of the other terms y dx and x dy”?
Task 6. Comment on Cauchy’s definition of limit and his proof that \(\frac{sinsin \alpha }{\alpha } = 1.\) What adjustments, if any, are needed to conform to the modern definition of limit?
Task 7. We have seen two explanations of the derivative rule \(\left( {x^n } \right)^{\prime} = nx^{n - 1} .\)
-
(a)
Compare and contrast the arguments of Cauchy and Newton.
-
(b)
Rewrite Cauchy’s argument in your own words with modern terminology, using modern properties of limits.
Appendix 2
Examples of essay assignments from the HAPh-module on “Boolean Algebra and Shannon Circuits” (Jankvist, 2011c).
-
a.
According to Hamming, what does it mean that a piece of mathematics is effective?
-
b.
Do a comparison of the relative effectiveness of Boole’s and Shannon’s works (systems) distinguishing between effectiveness in terms of philosophy and effectiveness in terms of applications.
-
c.
Based on your answers to the above questions, discuss different types of “the effectiveness of mathematics”. Recapitulate what Hamming means by the title of his paper “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics”, and why it may be seen as “unreasonable”.
-
d.
Do you consider Boole’s introduction and Shannon’s application of the idea of an algebra operating only on the elements 0 and 1 along with the mathematical interpretation of “and” and “or” as an example of Hamming’s ‘the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics’?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kjeldsen, T.H., Clark, K.M., Jankvist, U.T. (2022). Developing Historical Awareness Through the Use of Primary Sources in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. In: Michelsen, C., Beckmann, A., Freiman, V., Jankvist, U.T., Savard, A. (eds) Mathematics and Its Connections to the Arts and Sciences (MACAS). Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10518-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10518-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10517-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10518-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)