Skip to main content

Research on the Influence of Excess Perks on Firm Value: Based on the Perspective of Life Cycle Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management – Volume 2 (ICMSEM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 145))

Abstract

Since the separation of ownership and control rights, there have been a series of corporate agency problems. As a common agency problem, managerial perks has certain objectivity and inevitability. This paper focused on the influence of excess perks on firm value in different life cycle stages. The research object of this paper was the A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011 to 2020. After empirical analysis, the conclusions were drawn: (1) Executives’ excess perks has a significantly positive impact on firm value in the growth and maturity stages; (2) Executives’ excess perks has a significantly negative impact on firm value in the decline stage. The research conclusions of this paper provide important reference for firm management governance and decision-making in different life cycle stages, aiming to make contributions to enhancing firm value and promoting sustainable development of firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adithipyangkul, P., Alon, I., Zhang, T.: Executive perks: compensation and corporate performance in China. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 28(2), 401–425 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adizes, I.: Corporate LifeCycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do about it (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ai, J.: Guanxi networks in China: its importance and future trends. Chin. World. Econ. 14(5), 105–118 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, D., Li, O.Z., Liang, S.: Do Managers Perform for Perks? (2009). Available at SSRN 1464015

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickinson, V.: Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Account. Rev. 86(6), 1969–1994 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, D.H., Liang, S.K., Jiang, D.Q.: How marketization affects incentive contract costs and choices: perks or monetary compensations? Acc. Res. 11, 56–64 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esqueda, O.A., OConnor, T.: Corporate governance and life cycles in emerging markets. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 51, 101077 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Habib, A., Hasan, M.M.: Corporate life cycle research in accounting, finance and corporate governance: a survey, and directions for future research. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 61, 188–201 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harjoto, M.A., Jo, H.: CEO power and firm performance: a test of the life-cycle theory. Asia Pac. J. Financ. Stud. 38(1), 35–66 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(10), 997–1010 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hribar, P., Yehuda, N.: The mispricing of cash flows and accruals at different life-cycle stages. Contemp. Account. Res. 32(3), 1053–1072 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huan, L., Gaoping, Z., Dan, L.: Do big customers influence listed firms performance? Based on supplier-customer relationships in china. Chin. J. Acc. Stud. 5(3), 326–343 (2017). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jawahar, I., McLaughlin, G.L.: Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26(3), 397–414 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 305–360 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jian, C., Jun, C.: Individual governance effect of audit supervision under strict supervision atmospherełła study based on the excess perk of local soes’ executives. Econ. Theor. Bus. Manage. 41(5), 85 (2021). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lau, C.M.: Team and organizational resources, strategic orientations, and firm performance in a transitional economy. J. Bus. Res. 64(12), 1344–1351 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Qin, Y.H., Huang, J.C.: Perks, workers’ wages and firm performance. J. Finan. Trade Econ. 7, 60–68 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, Y.L., Tan, M.Z.: Accounting information transparency and firm value: retesting based on life cycle theory. J. Acc. Res. 10, 27–33 (2019). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Y., Li, Z., Tang, S.: Corporate life-cycle corporate governance and corporate capital allocation efficiency. Nankai Bus. Rev. 3, 110–121 (2011). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, P., Chen, W.Z.: The choice of different modes of enterprise life cycle and governance mechanism. J. Acc. Res. 5, 73–76 (2003). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luo, W., Zhang, Y., Zhu, N.: Bank ownership and executive perquisites: new evidence from an emerging market. J. Corp. Finan. 17(2), 352–370 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manage. Sci. 30(10), 1161–1183 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Quan, X., Wu, S., Wen, F.: Managerial power, private income and compensation rigging. Econ. Res. J. 11(1), 73–87 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xin, L., Zhang, M.: Enterprise absorptive capability, capital structure and corporation valueła case study of listed companies of strategic emerging industries in the Yangtze river economic zone. Acc. Res. 9, 47–55 (2018). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo, J., Lee, S., Park, S.: The effect of firm life cycle on the relationship between r &d expenditures and future performance, earnings uncertainty, and sustainable growth. Sustainability 11(8), 2371 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, X.P., Gao, P.: The contagion effect of corporate financial behavior: an empirical evidence from perquisites. J. Central Univ. Finan. Econ. 10, 68–80 (2019). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammermann, A., Mohnen, A.: Who benefits from benefits? Empirical research on tangible incentives. RMS 8(3), 327–350 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajan, R.G., Wulf, J.: Are perks purely managerial excess? J. Financ. Econ. 79(1), 1–33 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yermack, D.: Flights of fancy: corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns. J. Financ. Econ. 80(1), 211–242 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuxian Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhou, C., Manzoor, A. (2022). Research on the Influence of Excess Perks on Firm Value: Based on the Perspective of Life Cycle Theory. In: Xu, J., Altiparmak, F., Hassan, M.H.A., García Márquez, F.P., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management – Volume 2. ICMSEM 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10385-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics