Skip to main content

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly used as an outcome measure in surgery. This concept is of particular importance to intervention on the mitral valve (MV), in view of guidelines recommending early intervention on patients even if they are asymptomatic. Transcatheter MV procedures are continuously evolving and requires robust assessment, of which HRQoL is an important parameter. This chapter reviews all available literature surrounding HRQoL outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter MV interventions. While certain aspects of the literature were lacking, for example the lack of baseline HRQoL measurements in the majority of studies, most studies confirm that HRQoL benefits of transcatheter MV interventions is generally acceptable, with certain populations showing better HRQoL when compared to age- and gender-matched normal populations. This chapter also provides ideas for future research into HRQoL in transcatheter MV interventions, including establishing a common HRQoL instrument for disease-specific use, running randomised studies with baseline and follow-up HRQoL measured at specific predefined timepoints, and other innovative research areas including correlation of HRQoL with physical activity monitors, physiological biomarkers and radiological markers (e.g. leaflet stress from MRI and echocardiography) used as innovative markers of functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health, Guidance on the routine collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114(5):e84–231.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;118(15):e523–661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2012;42(4):S1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan MK, Jarral OA, Thong EH, Kidher E, Uppal R, Punjabi PP, et al. Quality of life after mitral valve intervention. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(2):265–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold SV, Chinnakondepalli KM, Spertus JA, Magnuson EA, Baron SJ, Kar S, et al. Health status after transcatheter mitral-valve repair in heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation: COAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(17):2123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buzzatti N, Maisano F, Latib A, Taramasso M, Denti P, La Canna G, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous MitraClip versus surgical repair or replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(4):487–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edelman JJB, Dias P, Passage J, Yamen E. Percutaneous mitral valve repair in a high-risk Australian series. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23(6):520–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, Kar S, Rinaldi MJ, Fail PS, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(15):1395–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Franzen O, van der Heyden J, Baldus S, Schlüter M, Schillinger W, Butter C, et al. MitraClip® therapy in patients with end-stage systolic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(5):569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Glower DD, Kar S, Trento A, Lim DS, Bajwa T, Quesada R, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients: results of the EVEREST II study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):172–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellhammer K, Balzer J, Zeus T, Rammos C, Niebel S, Kubatz L, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip® system in patients with anemia. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krawczyk-Ożóg A, Siudak Z, Sorysz D, Hołda MK, Płotek A, Dziewierz A, et al. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes and quality of life in patients with severe mitral regurgitation treated by MitraClip implantation or treated conservatively. Postępy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. Adv Interv Cardiol. 2018;14(3):291.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lim DS, Reynolds MR, Feldman T, Kar S, Herrmann HC, Wang A, et al. Improved functional status and quality of life in prohibitive surgical risk patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation after transcatheter mitral valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):182–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maisano F, Franzen O, Baldus S, Schäfer U, Hausleiter J, Butter C, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(12):1052–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Metze C, Matzik A-S, Scherner M, Körber MI, Michels G, Baldus S, et al. Impact of frailty on outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(19):1920–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neuss M, Schau T, Schoepp M, Seifert M, Hölschermann F, Meyhöfer J, et al. Patient selection criteria and midterm clinical outcome for MitraClip therapy in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and severe congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15(7):786–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reichenspurner H, Schillinger W, Baldus S, Hausleiter J, Butter C, Schäefer U, et al. Clinical outcomes through 12 months in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation treated with the MitraClip® device in the ACCESS-EUrope Phase I trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(4):e280–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rudolph V, Knap M, Franzen O, Schlüter M, de Vries T, Conradi L, et al. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of MitraClip therapy in patients not amenable to surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rudolph V, Huntgeburth M, von Bardeleben RS, Boekstegers P, Lubos E, Schillinger W, et al. Clinical outcome of critically ill, not fully recompensated, patients undergoing MitraClip therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(11):1223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taramasso M, Maisano F, Denti P, Latib A, La Canna G, Colombo A, et al. Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair in high-risk and elderly patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation: midterm outcomes in a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Terhoeven V, Nikendei C, Cranz A, Weisbrod M, Geis N, Raake PW, et al. Effects of MitraClip on cognitive and psychological function in heart failure patients: the sicker the better. Eur J Med Res. 2019;24(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ussia GP, Cammalleri V, Sarkar K, Scandura S, Immè S, Pistritto AM, et al. Quality of life following percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip System. Int J Cardiol. 2012;155(2):194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Van den Branden BJ, Swaans MJ, Post MC, Rensing BJ, Eefting FD, Jaarsma W, et al. Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in high-surgical-risk patients: do we hit the target? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitlow PL, Feldman T, Pedersen WR, Lim DS, Kipperman R, Smalling R, et al. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2):130–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Messika-Zeitoun D, Nickenig G, Latib A, Kuck K-H, Baldus S, Schueler R, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation using the Cardioband system: 1 year outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(5):466–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nickenig G, Hammerstingl C, Schueler R, Topilsky Y, Grayburn PA, Vahanian A, et al. Transcatheter mitral annuloplasty in chronic functional mitral regurgitation: 6-month results with the Cardioband percutaneous mitral repair system. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2039–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schofer J, Siminiak T, Haude M, Herrman JP, Vainer J, Wu JC, et al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study. Circulation. 2009;120(4):326–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Siminiak T, Wu JC, Haude M, Hoppe UC, Sadowski J, Lipiecki J, et al. Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation by percutaneous annuloplasty: results of the TITAN Trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(8):931–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wołoszyn M, Jerzykowska O, Kałmucki P, Link R, Firek L, Kuzemczak M, et al. Functional assessment of patients after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty with Carillon™ device: a preliminary report. Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(3):228–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arnold SV, Li Z, Vemulapalli S, Baron SJ, Mack MJ, Kosinski AS, et al. Association of transcatheter mitral valve repair with quality of life outcomes at 30 days and 1 year: analysis of the transcatheter valve therapy registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(12):1151–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lim DS, Kar S, Spargias K, Kipperman RM, O’Neill WW, Ng MK, et al. Transcatheter valve repair for patients with mitral regurgitation: 30-day results of the CLASP study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(14):1369–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. MacHaalany J, Bilodeau L, Hoffmann R, Sack S, Sievert H, Kautzner J, et al. Treatment of functional mitral valve regurgitation with the permanent percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty system: results of the multicenter international Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty System to Reduce Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Patients with Heart Failure trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165(5):761–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sorajja P, Moat N, Badhwar V, Walters D, Paone G, Bethea B, et al. Initial feasibility study of a new transcatheter mitral prosthesis: the first 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(11):1250–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taramasso M, Cioni M, Giacomini A, Michev I, Godino C, Montorfano M, et al. Emerging approaches of transcatheter valve repair/insertion. Cardiol Res Pract. 2010;2010:540749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Preston-Maher GL, Torii R, Burriesci G. A technical review of minimally invasive mitral valve replacements. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2015;6(2):174–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jarral OA, Kidher E, Patel VM, Nguyen B, Pepper J, Athanasiou T. Quality of life after intervention on the thoracic aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(2):369–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tan MKH, Wong JKL, Bakrania K, Abdullahi Y, Harling L, Casula R, et al. Can activity monitors predict outcomes in patients with heart failure? A systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2019;5(1):11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bergler-Klein J, Gyöngyösi M, Maurer G. The role of biomarkers in valvular heart disease: focus on natriuretic peptides. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(9):1027–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew K. H. Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tan, M.K.H., Jarral, O.A. (2022). Transcatheter Mitral Valve Procedures. In: Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A., Oo, A.Y. (eds) Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09815-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09815-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09814-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09815-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics