Skip to main content

Classification of Non-pharmaceutical Anti-COVID Interventions Based on Novel FTOPSIS-Sort Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 504))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 873 Accesses

Abstract

Assigning alternatives to predefined ordered categories under multicriteria conditions is the essence of multi-criteria sorting problematic. The family of fuzzy multi-criteria sorting models with the common name FTOPSIS-Sort are introduced based on the fuzzy extension of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) ordinary method TOPSIS with the use of different approaches to assess functions of fuzzy numbers and different fuzzy ranking methods. The features of adjusting Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) models to sorting problematic are presented. The developed FTOPSIS-Sort models are implemented for multi-criteria sorting of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alkan, N., Kahraman, C.: Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method. Appl. Soft Comput. 110, 107653 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez, P.A., Ishizaka, A., Martínez, L.: Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: a survey. Exp. Syst. Appl. 183, 115368 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campos, A.C.S.M., Mareschal, B., de Almeida, A.T.: Fuzzy FlowSort: an integration of the FlowSort method and fuzzy set theory for decision making on the basis of inaccurate quantitative data. Inf. Sci. 293, 115–124 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanss, M.: Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b138914

  6. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Springer, Berlin (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

  7. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(4), 637–666 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krejčí, J., Ishizaka, A.: FAHPSort: a fuzzy extension of the AHPSort method. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 17(04), 1119–1145 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622018400011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, J., Xu, Z., Qin, J.: A sorting method: BWMSort II in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olson, D.: Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Math. Comput. Modell. 40(7-8), 721–727 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira, J., de Oliveira, E.C.B., Gomes, L.F.A.M., Araújo, R.M.: Sorting retail locations in a large urban city by using ELECTRE TRI-c and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Soft. Comput. 23(12), 4193–4206 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Remadi, F.D., Frikha, H.M.: The FlowSort for multi criteria decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), pp. 238–244. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Springer, New York (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1

  14. Samanlioglu, F., Kaya, B.E.: Evaluation of the COVID-19 pandemic intervention strategies with hesitant f-AHP. J. Healthc. Eng. 2020, 1–11 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sayan, M., Yildirim, F.S., Sanlidag, T., Uzun, B., Ozsahin, D.U., Ozsahin, I.: Capacity evaluation of diagnostic tests for COVID-19 using multicriteria decision-making techniques. Comput. Math. Meth. Med. 2020, 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1560250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X., Ruan, D., Kerre, E.: Mathematics of Fuzziness Basic Issues (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78311-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yatsalo, B., Korobov, A., Martínez, L.: From MCDA to Fuzzy MCDA: violation of basic axiom and how to fix it. Neural Comput. Appl. 33(5), 1711–1732 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05053-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yatsalo, B., Korobov, A., Oztaysi, B., Kahraman, C., Martínez, L.: A general approach to Fuzzy TOPSIS based on the concept of fuzzy multicriteria acceptability analysis. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 38, 979–995 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yatsalo, B., Martínez, L.: Fuzzy rank acceptability analysis: a confidence measure of ranking fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26, 3579–3593 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yatsalo, B., Radaev, A., Martínez, L.: From MCDA to fuzzy MCDA: presumption of model adequacy or is every fuzzification of an mCDA method justified? Inf. Sci. 587, 371–392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138, 229–246 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Radaev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Radaev, A., Haktanir, E., Yatsalo, B., Kahraman, C. (2022). Classification of Non-pharmaceutical Anti-COVID Interventions Based on Novel FTOPSIS-Sort Models. In: Kahraman, C., Tolga, A.C., Cevik Onar, S., Cebi, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09173-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics