Abstract
Anal incontinence is a condition studied by physicians in modern times; in ancient times it was only described as a symptom associated with rectal prolapse or as a consequence of delivery. Even though the first treatments for anal incontinence were developed in the last two centuries, several techniques have been proposed and abandoned over this period. However, their study is required to thoroughly understand the current techniques and future research.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 History of Anal Incontinence
All animals with a digestive system and an anus are generally provided with a sphincter system (a circular muscular structure) that creates rhythmicity in the expulsion of feces. Both humans and higher animals regulate defecation with a continence mechanism. The peristalsis that moves the feces down to the rectum is not controlled by will but by the vegetative nervous system, and therefore the only way in which animals regulate the elimination of feces is by retaining them with the mechanism of continence. In animals, continence is relevant for social interactions: with the deposition of excrement in specific places, some animals mark their territory or demonstrate their fertility. For that purpose many animals use their legs and tails to scatter droppings at a distance and thus cover wider areas.
In humans, continence is naturally acquired after some time (usually 3–4 years) but becomes important with the beginning of social life; it is necessary to separate this act from other people, not out of modesty (which will appear only centuries later), but for the management of excrement.
As evidenced by many archaeological findings, the Romans had collective latrines where they used to have discussions while defecating (Fig. 1.1).
Whereas the first description of urine incontinence dates back to 1500 B.C. (Ebers Papyrus), no data are available regarding the first description of fecal incontinence in ancient times [1]. Its first description was as a symptom of rectal prolapse.
Andreas Vesalius performed dissections on cadavers and described the colon, rectum and anus in meticulous detail, as illustrated in his De Humani Corporis Fabrica, published in 1543. The anal sphincters as well as the levator ani muscle were clearly described by the author. However, the first illustration of the anal sphincter can be found in Leonardo da Vinci’s anatomical drawing of the rectum from the fifteenth century. This drawing depicts the anal sphincter as a flower with five different petal-shaped muscular structures and is accompanied by a theory on its functioning (Fig. 1.2). The five-petal structure may derive from the hemorrhoids: three major and two minor.
No detailed information on physiology was known at that time. Nevertheless, the risks and consequences of vaginal delivery on fecal incontinence were already known in Rome in the second century A.D. but repair of the injured anal canal was not described by the Romans [2].
Until the eighteenth century, the theory that explained continence was entirely based on the muscular layer of the rectum which pushed the feces outside the anus (Jean Astruc).
In 1835, Daniel Oliver wrote his First Lines of Physiology in which he stated that “the concurrence of the voluntary muscles with the action of the intestine itself, is indispensable to overcome the contraction of the sphincter of the rectum”, designing the first scientific theory [3]. The theory of a rectal “reservoir” and a muscular sphincter complex was then refined and improved in the twentieth century by two great scientists of the colon and rectum: Alan Park and Ahmed Shafik [4, 5]. Their vision of the anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus are still a key element of today’s theories.
2 History of Treatments for Anal Incontinence
2.1 Colonic Irrigation and Colostomy
Colonic irrigation was the first treatment described for anal incontinence although this was not its proper and exclusive indication; already in the fifth century B.C. the Egyptians “cleansed” themselves on three consecutive days every month, by using enemas to purify their body, as reported by Herodotus. This technique was also recorded in the Babylonian and Assyrian tables and in Hindu medicine. Though widely used through the centuries, no data were reported on the outcomes of colonic irrigation until the modern era.
The first surgical treatment for anal incontinence was stoma creation (first performed in 1776 by Pillore [6]); as in the case of colonic irrigation, this technique was mainly adopted for conditions other than incontinence.
2.2 Anal Sphincter Repair
The first description of a successful sphincter repair dates back to 1882; Warren performed a vaginal mucosal flap to protect the repair of the lacerated rectum and anus [7]. This technique was also reported by other authors in case series showing good results in the short-term follow-up [8].
Many techniques for the correction of incontinence caused by sphincter damage were subsequently developed by different surgical teams [9], but all of them were based mainly on end-to-end sphincter repair, which often had high failure rates [10, 11]. The first modern technique, overlapping sphincteroplasty, was developed in 1973 as an improvement of end-to-end repair. This technique is still performed with excellent results [12] and is also reported in the guidelines as a standard surgical treatment [13].
As regards “idiopathic” incontinence, however, it was not until 1975 that the first surgical technique was reported. That year, Sir Alan Parks described the so-called “postanal repair”, a technique aiming to increase the length of the anal canal, restore the anorectal angle, and create a flap valve mechanism. The promising short-term results of this technique were less favorable in the long-term follow-up, mainly because of misdetection of subclinical anterior sphincter defect after delivery [14].
In 1991, the introduction of endoanal ultrasound led to a dramatic change of view regarding the etiology of anal incontinence [15], and many cases of idiopathic incontinence could now be labelled as delivery sphincter damage and properly repaired with overlapping sphincteroplasty [16]. Postanal repair is now confined to a small minority of patients with anal incontinence and most of the international guidelines do not recommend it.
2.3 Muscle Transposition and Artificial Sphincter
Muscle transposition techniques mainly derived from the first experience with muscle fiber transposition for ocular palsy (1908, Hummelsheim) [17]. In the first half of the twentieth century, the idea of transposing muscle fibers or fascia to reinforce a weakened or damaged sphincter was developed. The first techniques based on anal encirclement by fascia date back to Harvey Stone in 1932 [18, 19] and were later modified in 1941 [20]; the results were promising, with a reported success rate of 70%. Other authors chose to suture together muscle fibers from both gluteal muscles anterior to the rectum, thus suspending it in a kind of muscular “hammock” [21, 22]. Merging these approaches, in 1952 Pickrell codified his “gracilis muscle transplant” that was later to take his name [23]. This technique is now performed with an implantable electrical pulse generator (stimulated muscle transposition) and will be discussed later in this book.
The first artificial sphincter for human use was developed for the treatment of urinary incontinence in 1973 by American Medical Systems (AMS, Minnetonka, MN, USA) and was later applied to anal incontinence by Christiansen and Lorentzen in 1987 [24]. New specific devices have been developed since then but, considering their recent introduction, they will be thoroughly discussed in another chapter of this book.
2.4 Bulking Agents
Like all innovators, Ahmed Shafik not only developed a theory of the mechanism of anal continence but also proposed a new kind of treatment option: the use of bulking agents. In 1993 he published a case series on polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence [25], with no complications reported and with promising results (improvement or cure in all cases). This technique was then reproduced with the aid of endoanal ultrasound to improve proper positioning of the agent, and now all bulking agents require ultrasound-guided positioning.
New technologies and new materials developed during the last twenty years have expanded this field of incontinence treatment with continuous news from scientific research. On the other hand, this fragmentation of materials and techniques has made it difficult to compare the results achieved with bulking agents and therefore the evidence to support their use has remained scarce.
2.5 Other Treatments and Techniques
Many other invasive and noninvasive treatments are now available for anal incontinence (sacral nerve stimulation, biofeedback, etc.) but, because their development is recent, they will be discussed in a separate chapter.
References
Ebbell B. The Papyrus Ebers: the greatest Egyptian medical document. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard; 1937.
Briel JW. Treatment of fecal incontinence. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint BV; 2000. p. 11.
Oliver D. First lines of physiology. Boston: Marsh. James Munroe: Capen & Lyon; 1835.
Parks AG, Rob C, Smith R, Morgan CN. Clinical Surgery: Abdomen and rectum and anus. London: Butterworths; 1966.
Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. The external anal sphincter: a triple-loop system. Investig Urol. 1975;12(5):412–9.
Hardy KJ. Surgical history. Evolution of the stoma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1989;59(1):71–7.
Warren JC. A new method of operation for the relief of rupture of the perineum through the sphincter and rectum. Trans Am Gynecol Soc. 1882;7:322–30.
Block IR, Rodriguez S, Olivares AL. The Warren operation for anal incontinence caused by disruption of the anterior segment of the anal sphincter, perineal body, and rectovaginal septum: report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1975;18(1):28–34.
Sistrunk WE. Contribution to plastic surgery: an open operation for extensive laceration of the anal sphincter. Ann Surg. 1927;85(2):185–93.
Lockhart-Mummery JP. Diseases of the rectum & colon and their surgical treatment. Toronto: Macmillan; 1923.
Blaisdell PC. Repair of the incontinent sphincter ani. Am J Surg. 1957;94(4):573–6.
Goetz LH, Lowry AC. Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005;18(1):22–31.
Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ clinical practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:623–36.
Surgical management of faecal incontinence in: Madoff RD, Pemberton JH, Mimura T, Laurberg S, editors. Faecal incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No 49). London: National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care; 2007. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg49. Accessed 28 Nov 2021.
Burnett SJD, Speakman CTM, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg. 1991;78(4):448–50.
Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):213–40.
Baker DC, Conley J. Regional muscle transposition for rehabilitation of the paralyzed face. Clin Plast Surg. 1979;6(3):317–31.
Stone HB. Plastic operation for anal incontinence. Tr South Surg Assoc. 1926;41:235–40.
Stone HB. Plastic operation for anal incontinence. Further report. Arch Surg. 1932;24:120–5.
Stone HB, McLanahan S. Results with the fascia plastic operation for anal incontinence. Ann Surg. 1941;114(1):73–7.
Chittenden AS. Reconstruction of anal sphincter by muscle slips from the glutei. Ann Surg. 1930;92(1):152–4.
Biström O. Plastischer Ersatz des M. Sphincter ani. Acta Chir Scand. 1944;90:431–48.
Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. An Surg. 1952;135(6):853–62.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet. 1987;330(8553):244–5.
Shafik A. Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence. Int Surg. 1993;78(2):159–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rispoli, C., Rispoli, G. (2023). History of Anal Incontinence and its Treatments. In: Docimo, L., Brusciano, L. (eds) Anal Incontinence. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08392-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08392-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08391-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08392-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)