Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic brought up the need for more accurate assessments of health technologies. Up to now, innovative medicines, as core of evaluations, let aside relevant aspects of the medical acts. The systematisation of treatments, protocols, procedures, policies and units, poorly managed by now, claim for assessments, standards, adequate policies, correct medical flows, suitable buildings’ use, according to international requirements. The research focuses on the advantages of standardisation and multidimensional evaluation’s influence on the health sector and medical affairs as profitable businesses. Befitted procedures build resilience and give use to the added value for people, business and society. The comparative analyses show that health technologies assessment’s alignment with international requirements brings all medical businesses to conformity and assures their fair, legal and ethical regularity and consistency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antes, A. L., Burrous, S., Sisk, B. A., Schuelke, M. J., Keune, J. D., & DuBois, J. M. (2021). Exploring Perceptions of Healthcare Technologies Enabled by Artificial Intelligence: An Online, Scenario-Based Survey. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01586-8
Banta, D. (2003). The Development of Health Technology Assessment. Health Policy, 63(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00059-3
Banta, D., & Johnsson, E. (2009). History of HTA: Introduction. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25 Suppl 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309090321
Banta, D., Jonsson, E., & Childs, P. (2009a). History of the International Societies in Health Technology Assessment: International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care and Health Technology Assessment International. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25 Suppl 1, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309090369
Banta, D., Kristensen, F. B., & Jonsson, E. (2009b). A History of Health Technology Assessment at the European Level. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309090448
Brodwin, E. (2020, December 17). It’s Really on Them to Learn’: How the Rapid Rollout of AI Tools Has Fuelled Frustration Among Clinicians. https://www.statnews.com/2020/12/17/artificial-intelligence-doctors-nurses-frustrated-ai-hospitals/
Congressional Budget Office. (2016). Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Congressional Budget Office. Accessed September 25, 2021, from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/18176
Daniel, G., Silcox, C., Sharma, I., & Bennett Wright, M. (2019). Current State and Near-Term Priorities for AI-Enabled Diagnostic Support Software in Health Care. Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy. https://healthpolicy.duke.edu/sites/default/files/2019-11/dukemargolisaienableddxss.pdf
Di Giacomo, F. T., Fishbein, B. G., & Buckley Vanessa, W. (2013). International Comparative Assessments: Broadening the Interpretability, Application and Relevance to the United States. Research in Review 2012–5. Trends. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562752.pdf
Doukanari, E., Ktoridou, D., Efthymiou, L., & Epaminonda, E. (2021). The Quest for Sustainable Teaching Praxis: Opportunities and Challenges of Multidisciplinary and Multicultural Teamwork. Sustainability, 13(13), 7210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137210
European Commission – Chamova Julia. (2017). Mapping of HTA National Organisations Programmes and Processes in EU and Norway. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Directorate B. Health Systems, Medical Products and Innovation. Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN: 978-92-79-77080-7.
Gonzalez-Cabezas, D., Zaror, C., & Herrera, M. Á. (2018). Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Development in South American Countries on the Basis of the Sustainable Society Index. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 26(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1540022
Karagouni, G. (2018). Production Technologies and Low-Technology Knowledge-Intensive Venturing. Euro Med Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2016-0033
Kristensen, F. B., Lampe, K., Chase, D. L., Lee-Robin, S. H., Wild, C., Moharra, M., Garrido, M. V., Nielsen, C. P., Røttingen, J.-A., Neikter, S. A., & Bistrup, M. L. (2009). Practical Tools and Methods for Health Technology Assessment in Europe: Structures, Methodologies, and Tools Developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment. EUnetHTA International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Suppl 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309990626
Lopert, R., Ruiz, F., Gheorghe, A., & Chanturidze, T. (2017). Asistență tehnică pentru crearea unei structuri instituționale de Evaluare a Tehnologiilor Medicale, inclusiv instruire pentru Agenția Națională a Medicamentului și Dispozitivelor Medicale. Contract nr: CS/3/24 Livrabil 1: Analiză situațională a Evaluării Tehnologice Medicale în România. Oxford Policy Management, Imperial College London, and Management Sciences for Health.
Mihălcescu Ana, M. (2020). Report on the HTA: Hermeneutică și Reziliență. Working Paper, UTM, Bucharest.
Mihoreanu, L. (2020). Empowering the Health Care Reform. PRO Universitaria.
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine Learning in Medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259
Topol, E. J. (2019). High-Performance Medicine: The Convergence of Human and Artificial Intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25, 44–56. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-018-0300-7
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. Accessed January 12, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device
Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Chebbi, H., & Yahiaoui, D. (2012). Transcending Innovativeness Towards Strategic Reflexivity. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(4), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211257097
Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Thrassou, A., Shams, S. M. R., & Tsoukatos, E. (2018). Innovation and Capacity Building: Cross-Disciplinary Management Theories and Practical Applications. Palgrave Macmillan.
Weatherall, D., Greenwood, B., Chee, H. L., & Wasi, P. (2006). Science and Technology for Disease Control: Past, Present, and Future. In D. Jamison, J. Breman, & A. Measham (Eds.), Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries [Internet] (2nd ed.). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Accessed September 26, 2021, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21250320
WHO. (2014). 67th World Health Assembly. Health Intervention and Technology Assessment in Support of Universal Health Coverage. Accessed September 26, 2021, from https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67/A67_R23-en.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mihoreanu, L. (2022). How Technologies Assessment Conceptualisation and Their Certification Could Help the Medical Business Boosting Performance. In: Thrassou, A., Vrontis, D., Efthymiou, L., Weber, Y., Shams, S.M.R., Tsoukatos, E. (eds) Business Advancement through Technology Volume I. Palgrave Studies in Cross-disciplinary Business Research, In Association with EuroMed Academy of Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07769-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07769-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07768-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07769-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)