Skip to main content

Certifying Knowledge Under Neoliberalism: Global Inequality and Academic Wellbeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication

Abstract

In this chapter, I offer an auto-ethnographic account of my own knowledge certification practices, specifically that of peer reviewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 37% profit margin is from the 2015 STM report authored by Ware and Mabe (2015); profit margins were not disclosed in the 2018 report, authored by Johnson et al. (2018), which instead underscored the many costs associated with journal production.

  2. 2.

    I am grateful to Janja Komljenovic for this idea, which she shared at the CGHE Annual Conference 2021: Remaking higher education for a more equal world.

References

  • Abbot, A. (2015). Futures for Library Research. Library as Laboratory: A Symposium on Humanities Collection and Research. Paper 3. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/libraryaslaboratory/3. Accessed 2 July 2021.

  • Anderson, K. (2014). Slow and Steady—Taking the Time to Think in the Age of Rapid Publishing Cycles. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/11/13/taking-the-time-to-think-in-the-age-of-rapid-publishing-cycles/. Accessed 30 June 2021.

  • Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19(6), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, D. (2017). Political economy in applied linguistics research. Language Teaching, 50(1), 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian 27.6.2017. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science. Accessed 30 June 2021.

  • Corcoran, J. (2019). Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A research-driven argument for critical support of Plurilingual Scientists’ Research Writing. Written Communication, 36(4), 538–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319861648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Universities Association. (2020). Read & Publish contracts in the context of a dynamic scholarly publishing system. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/932:read-publishagreements.html. Accessed 2 July 2021.

  • Flowerdew, J., & Habibie, P. (2022). Introducing English for Research Publication Purposes. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (1989). Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1989(18), 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. (2018). Half of UK academics ‘suffer stress-linked mental health problems’. Times Higher Education Supplement, 6 July, 2018. Accessed 2 July 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibie, P., & Hyland, K. (Eds.). (2019). Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultgren, A. K. (2019). English as the language for Academic Publication: On equity, disadvantage and ‘Non-Nativeness’ as a Red Herring. Publications, 7(2), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2020). Peer review: Objective screening or wishful thinking? Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 1(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M. (2017). “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30 (November 2017), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., Watkinson, A. and Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing, fifth edition. STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved 21 June 2022, from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf

  • Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2015). The politics of English, language and uptake: The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 28, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, B. (2015). Language and political economy. In N. Bonvillain (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Routledge Handbooks Online. Routledge. Retrieved 22 June 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, K. (2013). Political economy and language: A review of some recent literature. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 23, 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muellerleile, C. (2020). Open access panacea: Scarcity, abundance, and enclosure in the new economy of academic knowledge production. In D. Tyfield, R. Lave, S. Randalls, & C. Thorpe (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science (pp. 132–155). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, A., Hall, L., & Raphael, E. (2013). Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 132–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, D. (2018). English as the lingua franca of international publishing. World Englishes, 2018(37), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (2017). The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2019). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2017). The Toxic University: Zombie Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soler, J., & Cooper, A. (2017). “We have learned your paper”: Academic inequality and the discourse of parasite publishers. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 184, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Journal editors: Gatekeepers or custodians? In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp. 253–270). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, C., & Kerfoot, C. (2020). Decolonising higher education: Multilingualism, linguistic citizenship & epistemic justice. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, A. (2015). Governance by numbers. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusting, T., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM Report An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing, fourth edition. STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved 21 June 2022, from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf

  • Watson, A. (2021). Publisher income from learned journals in the United Kingdom (UK) 2013–2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/307021/publisher-income-from-learned-journals-by-source-in-the-uk/. Accessed 30 June 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the UK Research and Innovation for funding under a Future Leaders Fellowship (Grant reference: MR/T021500/1) for enabling the conceptual work underpinning this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Kristina Hultgren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hultgren, A.K. (2022). Certifying Knowledge Under Neoliberalism: Global Inequality and Academic Wellbeing. In: Habibie, P., Hultgren, A.K. (eds) The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06518-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06519-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics