Skip to main content

Posthumanism and Drama: From Shakespeare to Climate Change Plays

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism
  • 1440 Accesses

Abstract

While theatre as an art form is characterized by the inescapable presence of the human, it has also from its beginnings involved human interactions with machines and (stage) technology, staged artificial lives, interrogated the progression of science, diverse forms of identity, and the ethical and ontological relations between human and nonhuman world. This chapter focuses on these multiple connections between drama and critical posthumanism. It delineates four core areas in contemporary dramatic production and scholarship which intersect with and thrive on posthumanism, showing how each seeks to decenter the human and reflects the radical shifts of the Anthropocene: In global Shakespeare studies, posthumanism cuts across times, media, and spaces, and links productive new fields of inquiry, including ecocriticism, early modern literary studies, and adaptation studies. The next two sections narrow the focus to the thematic and the theatrical level, respectively. Posthuman subjectivities in dystopian settings, often infused with elements of the absurd, feature prominently in postmillennial science plays. Meanwhile immersive multimedia technologies continue to expand the realm of digital or cyberdrama and offer new forms of participation and interaction. Finally, climate change drama tackles the challenge of staging the agency of the nonhuman and of imagining futures, with and without the human.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balestrini, N. W. (2017). Change theater and cultural mobility in the Arctic: Chantal Bilodeau’s Sila (2014). Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 5(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2017-0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. (2011). Earthquakes in London. Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay-Cheng, S., Parker-Starbuck, J., & Saltz, D. Z. (2015). Performance and media: Taxonomies for a changing field. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, U. (2017). The tempest in the Anthropocene: Preliminary reflections. Shakespeare Jahrbuch, 153, 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birringer, J. (2006). Digital performance. Performance Research, 11(3), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1999). Shakespeare: The invention of the human. Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boller, A., & Voigts, E. (2019). ‘What counts as a liveable life and a grievable death?’ Critical posthumanism and cloning in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never let me go and Caryl Churchill’s A number. In J. Hoydis & R. Bartosch (Eds.), Teaching the posthuman (pp. 151–174). Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayton, D. (2012). Shakespeare’s ocean: An ecocritical exploration. University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisini, T., & Simmons, J. (2016). Posthuman relations in performance studies. Text and Performance Quarterly, 36(4), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callus, I., & Herbrechter, S. (2007). Critical posthumanism, or, the invention of a posthumanism without technology. Subject Matters, 3.2/4.1, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana, J., & Maisano, S. (2016). Renaissance posthumanism. Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, S. (2016). The turquoise elephant. Currency Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S.-E. (2007). Performing science and the virtual. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Causey, M. (1999). Postorganic performance: The appearance of theater in virtual spaces. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.), Cyberspace textuality: Computer technology and literary theory (pp. 182–202). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causey, M. (2016). Postdigital performance. Theatre Journal, 68(3), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiari, S. (2019). Shakespeare’s representation of weather, climate and environment: The early modern ‘fated sky’. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (2002). A number. Theatre Communications Group New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A. (2021). More future? Straight ecologies in British climate-change theatre. JCDE, 9(1), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, C. (2017a). Posthuman tempest in the twenty-first century. In A. J. Hartley (Ed.), Shakespeare and millennial fiction (pp. 177–192). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, C. (2017b). Alien Shakespeares 2.0. Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare, 35, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/shakespeare.3877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S. (2007). Digital performance. A history of new media in theatre, dance, performance art, and installation. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J. (2001). Performance, utopia, and the ‘utopian performative’. Theatre Journal, 53(3), 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egdon, G. (2006). Green Shakespeare. From ecopolitics to ecocritism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estok, S. (2011). Ecocriticism and Shakespeare. Reading ecophobia. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K., & Lusin, C. (2017). Introduction: Current debates and British drama since 2000. In K. Frank & C. Lusin (Eds.), Finance, terror, and science on stage: Current public concerns in 21st century British drama (pp. 9–18). Narr Francke Attempo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannachi, G. (2004). Virtual theatres: An introduction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glomb, S. (2017). A View From Nowhere: Science, Freedom and Determinism in Nick Payne’s Incognito (2014). In K. Frank & C. Lusin (Eds.), Finance, terror, and science on Stage. (pp. 185–210). Narr Francke Attempo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (1995). Introduction: Posthuman bodies. In J. Halberstam & I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 1–22). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, J. G. (2018). Contemporary Physics Plays. Making Time to Know Responsibility. Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Towards a posthumanist culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2012). Introduction: Shakespeare ever after. In S. Herbrechter & I. Callus (Eds.), Posthumanist Shakespeares (pp. 1–19). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism. A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2020). Hamlet, Shakespeare and posthumanism. Genealogy of the posthuman, 8 May 2020. Available at: https://criticalposthumanism.net/hamlet-shakespeare-and-posthumanism/

  • Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (Eds.). (2012). Posthumanist Shakespeares. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoydis, J. (2019). Posthuman lessons for the past and the future: Narrating otherness between history and technology. In R. Bartosch & J. Hoydis (Eds.), Teaching the posthuman (pp. 175–205). Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoydis, J. (2020a). (In)attention and global drama: Climate change plays. In D. Holmes & L. Richardson (Eds.), Research handbook on communicating climate change (pp. 340–348). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoydis, J. (2020b). A slow unfolding ‘fault sequence’: Risk and responsibility in Lucy Kirkwood’s The children. Journal for Contemporary Drama in English, 8(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2020-0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. (2012). ‘If you want to be green hold your breath’: Climate change in British theatre. New Theatre Quarterly, 28(3), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns-Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and literary studies: From cli-fi, climate change theater and ecopoetry to ecocriticism and climate change criticism. WIREs Climate Change, 7, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R. (2015). Posthuman drama: Identity and the machine in twenty-first-century playwriting. PhD thesis, University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.1010.

  • Jordan, R. (2021). Distributed agencies in dramatic form: A posthuman perspective on Lucy Prebble’s The sugar syndrome and Sarah Ruhl’s Dead man’s cell phone. Modern Drama, 64(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juráni, M. (2020). Breaking away from egocentrism. Posthumanism as a way of contemplating non-human matters on stage. The Slovak Theatre, 68(3), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, L. (2016). The children. Nick Hern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klich, R., & Scheer, E. (2012). Multimedia performance. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, D. (2014). Shakespearean rhizomatics: Adaptation, ethics, value. In A. Huang & E. Rivlin (Eds.), Shakespeare and the ethics of appropriation (pp. 21–40). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, H. (2006). Postdramatic theatre (Trans. and with an Introduction by K. Jürs-Munby). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, L. (2008). Posthuman perspectives and postdramatic theatre: The theory and practice of hybrid ontology in Katie Mitchell’s The waves. Culture, Language and Representation, VI, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedke, H., & Piertzak-Franger, M. (2021). Viral theatre: Preliminary thoughts on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online theatre. Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 9(1), 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, J. R. (2000). Creature Caliban. Shakespeare Quarterly, 51(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2012). The ethics of human cloning in narrative fiction. Comparative Literary Studies, 49(3), 405–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall-Griffith, L. (2016). Charlotte Brontë’s Villette. Re-imagined by Linda Marshall-Griffiths. A West Yorkshire Playhouse Production. Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah, A. (2008). A critical history of posthumanism. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity (pp. 71–94). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, J. (2015). Shakespeare and ecocriticism reconsidered. Literature Compass, 12(9), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Starbuck, J. (2014). Cyborg theatre. Corporeal/technological intersections in multimedia performance. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Starbucks, J. (2015). Cyborg Returns: Always-Already Subject Technologies. In S. Bay-Cheng, J. Parker-Starbuck, & D. Z. Saltz, Performance and media: Taxonomies for a changing field. (pp. 65–92), University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, C. (2017). Green world/no world: King Lear, ecocriticism, and the politics of finitude. Shakespeare Jahrbuch, 153, 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raber, K. (2013). Animal bodies, renaissance culture. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raber, K. (2018). Shakespeare and posthumanist theory. The Arden Shakespeare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, A. (2008). Theatre, intimacy and engagement: The last human venue. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remshardt, R. (2008). Beyond performance studies: Mediated performance and the posthuman. Culture, Language and Representation, VI, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (1982). The end of humanism: Writings on performance. Theatre Communications Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanecke, C. (2017). Data streams, post-human lives, and (virtual) realities: Jules Horne’s gorgeous avatar (2006). In K. Frank & C. Lusin (Eds.), Finance, terror, and science on stage (pp. 145–166). Narr Francke Attempo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scranton, R. (2015). Learning to die in the Anthropocene. Reflections on the end of a civilization. City Lights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seema, S. R. (2016). Re-reading William Shakespeare’s A midsummer night’s dream: An ecocritical analysis. Spring Magazine on English Literature, 2, 2. http://www.springmagazine.net/midsummer-nights-dream/

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd-Barr, K. E. (2006). Science on stage: From doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd-Barr, K. E. (2015). Theatre and evolution from Ibsen to Beckett. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sierz, A. (2010). Introduction. In A. Sierz (Ed.), The Methuen drama book of twenty-first century British plays (pp. vii–xviii). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarbrick, S., & Raber, K. (2020). Introduction: Renaissance posthumanism and its afterlives. Criticism, 62(3), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, H. S. (2009). Life science: Rude mechanics. Human mortals, posthuman Shakespeare. South Central Review, 26(1/2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P. (2017a). Creaturely memory: Shakespeare, the Anthropocene and the New Nomos of the Earth. Parallax, 23(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2017.1374508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P. (2017b). Future readers: Narrating the human in the Anthropocene. Textual Practice, 31(5), 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2017.1323459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigts, E., & Tönnies, M. (2020). Posthuman dystopia: Animal surrealism and permanent crisis in contemporary British theatre. JCDE, 8(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2020-0024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, M. (Ed.). (2016). Staging science. Scientific performance on street, stage and screen. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winckler, R. (2020). Hacking adaptation: Updating, porting, and forking the Shakespearean source code. Adaptation, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apaa026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, W. B. (2010). Posthuman Shakespeare performance studies. Postmedieval, 1–2, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabus, C. J. (2002). Tempests after Shakespeare. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zehelein, E.-S. (2009). Science dramatic. Science plays in America and Great Britain 1990–2007. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Hoydis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hoydis, J. (2022). Posthumanism and Drama: From Shakespeare to Climate Change Plays. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics