Skip to main content

Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Systemic Risk Assessment and Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 638))

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has activated hundreds of interdependent long-lasting risks across all sectors of society. Zoonotic diseases are on the rise, fuelled by climatic change, by encroachment and destruction of habitats, and by unsustainable practices. Risk assessment and management must be greatly improved to prevent even worse consequences than COVID-19 if the next pandemic is caused by an agent with higher infectiousness and lethality. Insights from a project on systemic pandemic risk management reveal that the interdependency of risks creates cascading effects mediated by millions of vicious cycles which must be addressed to gain control over a pandemic. We propose a method for systemic, cross-sectoral risk assessment that detects the myriad of causal influences resulting from the risks, allowing to identify and mitigate the most potent risks, i.e., those participating in the highest numbers of vicious loops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Listings of WHO’s response to COVID-19. https://www.who.int/news/item/29-06-2020-covidtimeline. Accessed 15 Dec 2021

  2. Coronavirus (Covid-19) Vaccination. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations. Accessed 15 Dec 2021

  3. United Nations Environment Programme, Preventing the Next Pandemic: Zoonotic diseases and how to break the chain of transmission. Nairobi, Kenya (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations, A UN framework for the immediate socio-economic response to COVID-19 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etkin, D.: Disaster Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Concepts and Causes. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2019. https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-disaster-risk-reduction-2019#:~:text=The%202019%20Global%20Assessment%20Report%20on%20Disaster%20Risk,the%20state%20of%20the%20global%20disaster%20risk%20landscape. Accessed 21 Sept 2021

  7. Aven, T.: Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253, 1–13 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Amaratunga, D., et al.: Disaster risk governance and systemic risks: policy challenges associated with the COVID19 Pandemic Governance. In: Senaratne, R., Amaratunga, D. (eds.) National Conference on Covid-19: Impact, Mitigation, Strategies and Building Resilience (BMICH), Colombo, Sri Lanka (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Solarz, J.K., Waliszewski, K.: Holistic framework for COVID-19 pandemic as systemic risk. Eur. Res. Stud. J. XXIII(Special Issue 2), 340–351 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y., Poncelet, J., Min, G., Lee, J., Yang, Y.: COVID-19: systemic risk and response management in the Republic of Korea. Prog. Disaster Sci. 12, 100200 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Corona Commision Report, The authorities’ handling of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/5d388acc92064389b2a4e1a449c5865e/no/sved/01kap02engelsk.pdf

  12. Gonzalez, J.J., et al.: Elicitation, analysis and mitigation of systemic pandemic risks. In: Adrot, A., Grace, R., Moore, K., Zobel, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th ISCRAM Conference – Blacksburg, VA, USA, May 2021

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T., Howick, S.: Systemic risk assessment: a case study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(1), 39–51 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grösser, S.N.: Complexity management and system dynamics thinking. In: Grösser, S.N., Reyes-Lecuona, A., Granholm, G. (eds.) Dynamics of long-life assets, pp. 69–92. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45438-2_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Peleg, K., Bodas, M., Hertelendy, A.J., Kirsch, T.D.: The COVID-19 pandemic challenge to the all-hazards approach for disaster planning. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 55, 102103 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Senge, P.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Business, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Oxford English Dictionary Britannica Academic. Accessed 15th June 2021

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dictionary of Economics, 4th edn. Reference Rev. 27(3), 14–15 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Calhoun, C. (ed.): Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Bar-Yam, Y.: Dynamics of Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell, M.: Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Vatn, J.: Can we understand complex systems in terms of risk analysis? Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 226, 346–58 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johansen, I.L., Rausand, M.: Defining complexity for risk assessment of sociotechnical systems: a conceptual framework. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 228, 272–290 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bjerga, T., Aven, T., Zio, E.: Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: the case of STAMP and FRAM. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 156, 203–209 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen, A., Aven, T.: A new definition of complexity in a risk analysis setting. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 171, 169–173 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaplan, S., Garrick, B.J.: On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1, 11–27 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Williams, T.: The amoebic growth of project costs. Proj. Manag. J. 36(1), 15–27 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyneis, J.M., Ford, D.N.: System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 23, 157–189 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Howick, S., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T.: Delay and disruption in complex projects. In: Dangerfield, B. (ed.) System Dynamics. ECSSS, pp. 315–339. Springer, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Spinney, L.: Pale Rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and how it Changed the World. Jonathan Cape, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ewald, P.W.: Evolution of virulence, environmental change, and the threat posed by emerging and chronic diseases. Ecol. Res. 26(6), 1017–1026 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-011-0874-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spinney, L.: Coronavirus is evolving. Whether it gets deadlier or not may depend on us, in The Guardian. London, UK (2020). https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/nov/19/coronavirus-evolving-deadlier-evidence-social-distancing-covid-19. Accessed 14 June 2021

  33. Lupton, D.: Risk, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, T.M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Project risk: systemicity, cause mapping and scenario approach. In: Kahkonen, K., Artto, K.A. (eds.) Managing Risks in Projects, pp. 343–352. E&FN Spon, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ackermann, F., Howick, S., Quigley, J., Walls, L., Houghton, T.: Systemic risk elicitation: using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(1), 290–299 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Pyrko, I., Eden, C., Howick, S.: Knowledge acquisition using group support systems. Group Decis. Negot. 28(2), 233–253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications Ltd, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Allaby, M.: Oxford Reference - A Dictionary of Ecology, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Femia, F., Werrell, C.: The climate and security imperative. In: Looney, R.E. (ed.) Handbook of Transitions to Energy and Climate Security, pp. 41–57. Routledge, London (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Helbing, D., Mukerji, P.: Crowd disasters as systemic failures: analysis of the Love Parade disaster. EPJ Data Sci. 1(1), 1–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rehak, D., Senovsky, P., Hromada, M., Lovecek, T., Novotny, P.: Cascading impact assessment in a critical infrastructure system. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 22, 125–138 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, W., et al.: An approach for cascading effects within critical infrastructure systems. Physica A 510, 164–177 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnson, D.B.: Finding all the elementary circuits of a directed graph. SIAM J. Comput. 4, 77–84 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Ridley, M.: How innovation works. London: 4th Estate, London, UK (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guterres, A.: Recovery from the coronavirus crisis must lead to a better world (2020). https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/articles/2020-04-02/recovery-the-coronavirus-crisis-must-lead-better-world. Accessed 14 Dec 2021

  46. Gonzalez, J.J.: Can technology help against technology? TEDx Talk, 5th November 2021. https://youtu.be/aIqqj5VcCXM

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Research Council of Norway for funding the innovation project “Systemic Pandemic Risk Management”, grant #315444.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose J. Gonzalez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gonzalez, J.J., Eden, C. (2022). Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Systemic Risk Assessment and Management. In: Sasaki, J., Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04170-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04170-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04169-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04170-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics