Skip to main content

Peirce on Abduction and Diagrams in Mathematical Reasoning

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics

Abstract

Questions regarding the nature and acquisition of mathematical knowledge are perhaps as old as mathematical thinking itself, while fundamental issues of mathematical ontology and epistemology have direct bearing on mathematical cognition. Several original contributions to logic and mathematics made by the American polymath, Charles Sanders Peirce, are of direct relevance to these fundamental issues. This chapter explores scientific reasoning as it relates to abduction, a name that Peirce coined for educated “guessing” of hypotheses, which he took to be “the first step of scientific reasoning” and the only creative one. Yet he also argued that all deductive reasoning is mathematical and that all mathematical reasoning is diagrammatic. Representation, especially in the form of a diagrammatic system of logic that Peirce developed, is explored here along with his logic of inquiry, most notably in terms of its manifestation as the logic of ingenuity. Originating in the field of engineering, here the diagram of a problem serves as a heuristic substitute for evaluating the actual situation, an approach that can be extended to other forms of practical reasoning such as ethical deliberation. This chapter also touches upon such diverse but related subjects as non-Euclidean geometry and nonclassical logic, with additional examples that help to elucidate cognitive elements of mathematical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aczel, A. (1997). Fermat’s last theorem: Unlocking the secret of an ancient mathematical problem. New York: Dell Publishing.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bacheti, C. G. (Ed.). (1670). Diophanti Alexandrini Arithmeticorum. Tolosae: Bernardus Bosc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, J. (2003). An interview with Usama Fayyad (data mining expert). The Believer, 6. https://believermag.com/an-interview-with-usama-fayyad/. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.

  • Bell, J. (2006). The continuous and the infinitesimal in mathematics and philosophy. Milan: Polimetrica S.a.s.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burks, A. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 4, 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, D. (2015). The role of diagrammatic reasoning in ethical deliberation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce. Society, 51(3), 338–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauben, J. (1979). Georg Cantor: His mathematics and philosophy of the infinite. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dauben, J. (1995). Peirce and history of science. In K. Ketner (Ed.), Peirce and contemporary thought: Philosophical inquiries (pp. 146–195). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dea, S. (2008). Firstness, evolution and the absolute in Peirce’s Spinoza. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce. Society, 44(4), 603–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisele, C. (1975). C. S. Peirce’s search for a method in mathematics and the history of science. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce. Society, 11(3), 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figuier, L. (1876). Vies des savants illustres depuis l’antiquité jusqu’au dix-neuvième siècle. Paris: Libraire Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, G., & Tausch-Pebody, G. (2020). The 1919 eclipse results that verified general relativity and their later detractors: A story re-told. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2020.0040.

  • Grabiner, J. (2009). Why did Lagrange “prove” the parallel postulate? American Mathematical Monthly, 116(1), 3–18.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2007). Worlds out of nothing: A course in the history of geometry in the 19th century. London: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (Ed.). (1703). Euclidis quæ supersunt omnia. Oxoniæ: Theatro Sheldoniano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. (Ed.). (1908). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. (1999). Problems with Peirce’s concept of abduction. Foundations of Science, 4, 271–305.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. (2006). Seeing problems, seeing solutions: Abduction and diagrammatic reasoning in a theory of scientific discovery. In Working paper series. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/24031/wp15.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, J. (1609). Astronomia Nova. Prague.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, E. (2019). A total solar eclipse 100 years ago proved Einstein’s general relativity. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/total-solar-eclipse-100-years-ago-proved-einsteins-general-relativity-180972278/. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  • Miller, N. (2007). Euclid and his twentieth century rivals: Diagrams in the logic of Euclidean geometry. Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://www.unco.edu/nhs/mathematical-sciences/faculty/miller/pdf/euclid20thcenturyrivalsmiller.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oostra, A. (2010). Los gráficos Alfa de Peirce aplicados a la lógica intuicionista. Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana, 2, 25–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostra, A. (2011). Gráficos existenciales Beta intuicionistas. Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana, 3, 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostra, A. (2013). La matemática intuicionista y los axiomas de Peirce para la lógica proposicional. Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana, 5, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (1998). Proof and perception II. Preuve Proof Prueba: Web Newsletter. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/980708.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2020.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1839–1914). Charles S. Peirce papers. Cambridge: Harvard University, Houghton Library. Abbreviated here as MS followed by manuscript number as assigned by Robin [1967].

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1929). Guessing. Hound and Horn, 2(3), 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1931−1958). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Abbreviated here as CP followed by volume and paragraph number(s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1976). New elements of mathematics (C. Eisele, Ed.). The Hague: Mouton. Abbreviated here as NEM followed by volume and page number(s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1982–2009). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition (Peirce Edition Project, Eds.). Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Abbreviated here as W followed by volume and page number(s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1985). Historical perspectives on Peirce's logic of science: A history of science (C. Eisele, Ed.). Berlin: Mouton Publishers. Abbreviated here as LOS followed by page number(s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1992–1998). The essential Peirce. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Abbreviated here as EP followed by volume and page number(s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raatikainen, P. (2004). Conceptions of truth in intuitionism. History and Philosophy of Logic, 25(2), 131–145.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, G. (2005). Outline of trikonic: Diagrammatic trichotomic. In F. Dau, M.-L. Mugnier, & G. Stumme (Eds.), Conceptual structures: Common semantics for sharing knowledge (pp. 453–466). Berlin: Springer. http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/richmond/trikonic.htm. Accessed 5 Nov 2020.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1992). The existential graphs. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(6–9), 639–663. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82124291.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2021.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, R. (1967). Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press. http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/robin/rcatalog.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2013). Engineering as willing. In D. Michelfelder et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 103–111). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2016). The logic of ingenuity. Structure. http://www.STRUCTUREmag.org/?p=10373. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.

  • Schmidt, J. (2020). Peirce’s topical continuum: A “thicker” theory. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce. Society, 56(1), 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, R. (2001). The non-Euclidean revolution. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dauben, J.W., Richmond, G.J., Schmidt, J.A. (2022). Peirce on Abduction and Diagrams in Mathematical Reasoning. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics