Abstract
Research into so-called alternative medicine (SCAM) faces many problems. Practitioners of SCAM try to persuade consumers that, for several reasons, research in their field is not all that important. The amount of research into SCAM is relatively small and its quality is often very poor. Crucially, SCAM researchers are often deeply biased towards their therapy and seem incapable of critical assessments. Adverse effects of SCAM are thus both under-investigated and under-reported. These and many further problems contribute to much confusion and mislead consumers about the value of SCAM. Such confusion can lead to ill-advised therapeutic decisions potentially endangering public health.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
amazon.co.uk/SCAM-So-Called-Alternative-Medicine-Societas/dp/1845409701. Accessed 4 May 2021
amazon.co.uk/Harmony-New-Way-Looking-World/dp/0007348037. Accessed 4 May 2021
cnhc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Downloads/PGIH-Report.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2021
Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Stevinson C, Marshall FP, Conn DA, Ernst E (2001) Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain 91(1-2):79–89
White A, Slade P, Hunt C, Hart A, Ernst E (2003) Individualised homeopathy as an adjunct in the treatment of childhood asthma: a randomised placebo controlled trial. Thorax 58(4):317–321
Glaszlou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P et al (2014) Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 393(9913):267–276
edzardernst.com. Accessed 4 May 2021
Ernst E (1996) Regulating complementary medicine. Only 0.08% of funding for research in NHS goes to complementary medicine. BMJ 313(7061):882
Ernst E, Pittler MH (1997) Alternative therapy bias. Nature 385(6616):480
Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E (2013) Adverse effects of herbal medicines: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Med (Lond) 13(1):7–12
Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E (2013) Contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products (HMPs): an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59(3):295–307
Ernst E (2012) Interactions between drugs and supplements: the tip of an iceberg? Int J Clin Pract 66:1056–1078
Melchart D, Weidenhammer W, Streng A, Reitmayr S, Hoppe A, Ernst E, Linde K (2004) Prospective investigation of adverse effects of acupuncture in 97 733 patients. Arch Intern Med 164(1):104–105
Stevinson C, Ernst E (2002) Risks associated with spinal manipulation. Am J Med 112(7):566–571
Ernst E (2011) Fatalities after CAM: an overview. Br J Gen Pract 61(587):404–405
Ernst E (2011) Anthroposophy: a risk factor for noncompliance with measles immunization. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30(3):187–189
Ernst E (2007) Popular health advice: entertainment or risk factor? Br J Gen Pract 57(538):415
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ernst, E. (2022). Misleading Research of So-Called Alternative Medicine. In: Faintuch, J., Faintuch, S. (eds) Integrity of Scientific Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99679-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99680-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)