Abstract
Event definitions in Complex Event Processing systems are constrained by the expressiveness of each system’s language. Some systems allow the definition of instantaneous complex events, while others allow the definition of durative complex events. While there are exceptions that offer both options, they often lack of intervals relations such as those specified by the Allen’s interval algebra. In this paper, we propose a new logic based temporal phenomena definition language, specifically tailored for Complex Event Processing. Our proposed language allows the representation of both instantaneous and durative phenomena and the temporal relations between them. Moreover, we demonstrate the expressiveness of our proposed language by employing a maritime use case where we define maritime events of interest. We analyse the execution semantics of our proposed language for stream processing and finally, we introduce and evaluate on real world data, Phenesthe, our open-source Complex Event Processing system.
This work has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Doctoral Training in Distributed Algorithms at the University of Liverpool, and Denbridge Marine Limited, United Kingdom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Phenesthe corresponds to the Greek word ‘\(\mathrm {\Phi }\upalpha \acute{\upiota }\upnu \upvarepsilon \upsigma \upvartheta \upalpha \upiota \)’ which means ‘to appear’. Phenesthe (\(\mathrm {\Phi }\upalpha \acute{\upiota }\upnu \upvarepsilon \upsigma \upvartheta \upalpha \upiota \)) and phenomenon (\(\upvarphi \upalpha \upiota \upnu \acute{\mathrm {o}}\upmu \upvarepsilon \upnu \mathrm {o}\upnu \)) are different forms of the ancient Greek verb ‘\(\mathrm {\Phi }\upalpha \acute{\upiota }\upnu \upomega \)’ meaning ‘I cause to appear’.
- 2.
We extend the set of all allowed values with \(t_\circ \) denoting a time instant that is currently not known but the domain of its possible values is known.
References
Ahmed, A., Lisitsa, A., Dixon, C.: A misuse-based network intrusion detection system using temporal logic and stream processing. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Network and System Security, pp. 1–8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSS.2011.6059953
Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun. ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358434
Anicic, D., Fodor, P., Rudolph, S., Stühmer, R., Stojanovic, N., Studer, R.: A rule-based language for complex event processing and reasoning. In: Hitzler, P., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) RR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6333, pp. 42–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_5
Anicic, D., Rudolph, S., Fodor, P., Stojanovic, N.: Stream reasoning and complex event processing in ETALIS. Semant. Web 3(4), 397–407 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2011-0053
Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Paliouras, G.: An event calculus for event recognition. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27(4), 895–908 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2014.2356476
Balbiani, P., Goranko, V., Sciavicco, G.: Two-sorted point-interval temporal logics. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 278, 31–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2011.10.004
Beck, H., Dao-Tran, M., Eiter, T.: LARS: a logic-based framework for analytic reasoning over streams. Artif. Intell. 261, 16–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.04.003
Bellini, P., Mattolini, R., Nesi, P.: Temporal logics for real-time system specification. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(1), 12–42 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/349194.349197
Bohlen, M.H., Busatto, R., Jensen, C.S.: Point-versus interval-based temporal data models. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 192–200 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1998.655777
Chittaro, L., Montanari, A.: Efficient temporal reasoning in the cached event calculus. Comput. Intell. 12(3), 359–382 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1996.tb00267.x
Chomicki, J.: Temporal query languages: a survey. In: Gabbay, D.M., Ohlbach, H.J. (eds.) ICTL 1994. LNCS, vol. 827, pp. 506–534. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0014006
Cugola, G., Margara, A.: TESLA: a formally defined event specification language. In: DEBS ’10, p. 50. ACM Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1827418.1827427
Dohr, A., Engels, C., Behrend, A.: Algebraic operators for processing sets of temporal intervals in relational databases. In: TIME (2018)
Chen, H.-Y., Tsai, J.J.P., Bi, Y.: An event-based real-time logic to specify the behavior and timing properties of real-time systems. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence - TAI 91, pp. 210–219 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1991.167097
Khan, A., Bozzato, L., Serafini, L., Lazzerini, B.: Visual reasoning on complex events in soccer videos using answer set programming. In: Calvanese, D., Iocchi, L. (eds.) GCAI 2019. Proceedings of the 5th Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence. EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 65, pp. 42–53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.29007/pjd4
Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. N. Gener. Comput. 4(1), 67–95 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037383
Libkin, L.: Elements of Finite Model Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07003-1
Mao, C., Eran, A., Luo, Y.: Efficient genomic interval queries using augmented range trees. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 5059 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41451-3
Mileo, A., Abdelrahman, A., Policarpio, S., Hauswirth, M.: StreamRule: a nonmonotonic stream reasoning system for the semantic web. In: Faber, W., Lembo, D. (eds.) RR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7994, pp. 247–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_23
Mueller, E.T.: Chapter 5 - the commonsense law of inertia. In: Mueller, E.T. (ed.) Commonsense Reasoning (Second Edn.), pp. 77–89. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801416-5.00005-X
Pitsikalis, M., Artikis, A., Dreo, R., Ray, C., Camossi, E., Jousselme, A.L.: Composite event recognition for maritime monitoring. In: DEBS (2019), pp. 163–174. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328905.3329762
Pitsikalis, M., Lisitsa, A., Luo, S.: Phenesthe (2021). https://github.com/manospits/Phenesthe
Pitsikalis, M., Lisitsa, A., Luo, S.: Representation and processing of instantaneous and durative temporal phenomena (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13365
Ray, C., Dréo, R., Camossi, E., Jousselme, A.L., Iphar, C.: Heterogeneous integrated dataset for maritime intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Data Brief 25, 104141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104141
Roy, J.: Rule-based expert system for maritime anomaly detection. In: Carapezza, E.M. (ed.) Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense IX, vol. 7666, pp. 597–608. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.849131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pitsikalis, M., Lisitsa, A., Luo, S. (2022). Representation and Processing of Instantaneous and Durative Temporal Phenomena. In: De Angelis, E., Vanhoof, W. (eds) Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation. LOPSTR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13290. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98869-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98869-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98868-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98869-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)