Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The International Library of Bioethics ((ILB,volume 94))

  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

During the four decade span of my career medicine has changed dramatically. Regrettably my generation of physicians has been party to the evolving prioritization of profit over principle that has characterized those years. We have been indoctrinated into the commercial ethic, and in the process have lost professional autonomy and agency. The greed of some doctors (“knaves”) and the complacency of many more (“pawns”) have abetted the advancing power of the medical marketplace. Ethics for some has become functionally irrelevant. Those few physicians who resist these trends (“knights”) have insufficient strength to prevail, and become disposable as today’s “sacrificial lambs”. Medicine is thriving as a business, but will it survive as a profession? The heroics of so many HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that it can. We must support the next generation of doctors and nurses to follow their stellar example. Society also should emphasize the importance of simple, genuine caring for our patients and each other. Devotion to the time and quality of care necessary for medical professionalism merits support. Public health, the target of humanitas and misericordia, demands no less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Addressing medical rationing in 1997, my mentor, Professor Mark Hall wrote, “Medical ethics is subservient to the financing system within which society asks physicians to practice.” At the time he was referring to physicians’ responsibility to distributive justice and their need to conserve limited resources not only for their individual patients, but also for society at large. In the present context that statement becomes much more ominous (Italics added).

  2. 2.

    The medical narrative also is pursued in the journal, Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, edited by James DuBois, D.Sc., Ph.D.; and Ana Iltis, Ph.D. Its second issue (2011) was devoted to physicians’ stories of the influence of financial conflicts of interest upon their training or practice.

References

  • Charon, R. 2006. Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P.W. 2009. The Hidden Curriculum of Medical School. New York Times, January 29. Located at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/health/29chen.html. Accessed 19 July 2017.

  • DuBois, J., and A. Iltis (eds.). 2011. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. 1994. Primum Non Tacere: An Ethics of Speaking Up. Hastings Center Report 24 (1): 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fins, J.J. 2007. Commercialism in the Clinic: Finding Balance in Medical Professionalism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16: 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty, F.W., and J.F. O’Donnell (eds.). 2014. The Hidden Curriculum in Health Professional Education. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M.A. 1997. Making Medical Spending Decisions: The Law, Ethics, & Economics of Rationing Mechanisms. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., M.J. Vergare, K. Maxwell, G. Brainard, S.K. Herrine, G.A. Isenberg, J. Veloski, and J.S. Gonnella. 2009. The Devil Is in the Third Year: A Longitudinal Study of Erosion of Empathy in Medical School. Academic Medicine 84 (9): 1182–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariner, W.K. 1995. Business vs. Medical Ethics: Conflicting Standards for Managed Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 23 (3): 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, A.M. 2016. The Finest Traditions of My Calling: One Physician’s Search for the Renewal of Medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D., and D.C. Thomasma. 1993. The Virtues in Medical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, A. Located at https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/47146.AlbertSchweizer?page=1. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.

  • Starr, P. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas E. Lemley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lemley, D.E. (2022). An Uncertain Future for Medicine: Business or Profession?. In: Too Conscientious: The Evolution of Ethical Challenges to Professionalism in the American Medical Marketplace. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96859-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics