Skip to main content

Private Lecturer at the University of Munich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Max von Laue

Part of the book series: Springer Biographies ((SPRINGERBIOGS))

  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

Up to this point, Max Laue’s academic career had followed a direct course. At Munich, he had become eligible to receive an appointment to a professorship. His chances were good, because there were very few younger theoretical physicists who had studied under various academic teachers and were as versed as Laue in tackling unresolved problems, as his publications demonstrated. Moreover, the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich had a chair in Theoretical Physics. Around 1910 this was not yet the rule at German universities. The leaders in this field were Berlin, Göttingen, and Munich, and Laue’s contributions to the field were well known. The chairholder in theoretical physics at Munich, Arnold Sommerfeld (Fig. 5.1), was an outstanding academic teacher (Eckert 2013: Chap. 6). After completing his studies in mathematics at Göttingen, he had begun his career as an academic teacher at the Mining Academy in Clausthal. He had then followed a call to the polytechnic in Aachen, where he was more of a mathematician—with research on the theory of gyroscopes and contributions to statics—than a physicist (Klein and Sommerfeld 1965). In 1900, at Röntgen’s instigation, he had been appointed to the chair in the field of theoretical physics at the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, which had been vacated by Ludwig Boltzmann in order to return home to Vienna. Sommerfeld mainly studied the nature of X-rays and relativity theory. Sommerfeld’s institute had its own workshop and mechanic, which meant experimental research was possible there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sommerfeld was already working on the nature of X-rays at the Bergakademie in Clausthal, albeit without being able to come up with any clear results (Sommerfeld 1899). Other research on the same topic by M. Maier from slightly earlier appeared in the same issue on p. 57.

  2. 2.

    Planck’s correspondence with Lorentz reveals how difficult it was for physicists to understand what radiation was. On 16 Jun. 1909 Planck wrote to Lorentz: “But now to radiation. That it doesn’t work without the assumption of light quanta hν, on that we do agree (in contrast to Jeans). That furthermore light quanta can’t possibly retain their individuality while propagating in the free aether, you have explained so convincingly in the second part of your letter that I believe there can be no doubt about that either. The whole of optics, especially the theory of interference and refraction and diffraction, would have to be overturned if one wanted to ascribe specific existence to light quanta in the free aether.” AMPG, V rep. 11 no. 568, orig. emphasis.

    Paul Peter Ewald described a lecture at the colloquium prior to Laue’s appointment to Munich on ‘The behavior of light waves at the focal point.’ He thought that was a prerequisite for Laue’s move from Berlin to Munich. See Ewald (1968).

  3. 3.

    Laue to Wien, Munich, 3 Apr. 1909. DMA, NL 056/409-452 and HUA, UKP, L 51, vol. 4.

  4. 4.

    STAM, marriage register, Standesamt München I, 1189/1910. Laue’s handwritten communication to the university rectorate reads: “Daughter of the late Captain Erwin Freiherr Milkau and his wife Emmy, née Degen.” See also HUA, UKP, L 51 and LMUA, PA E-II, 2224.

  5. 5.

    Hermann (1994: 157). At the end of 1908 Einstein received an inquiry from the Hirzel publishing house in Leipzig. He agreed at first but later retracted again: “Unfortunately it is quite impossible for me to write that book, because it is impossible for me to find the time for it.” Comp. Fölsing (2004: 262). There aren’t any files at Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn from this period. Very likely, several physicists were invited by this publisher to write a book on relativity. Who suggested Laue is no longer ascertainable. For remarks by Laue about relativity see Staley (2008).

  6. 6.

    The place of origin of the research is indicated as the Institute for Theoretical Physics in Munich and dated March 1912.

  7. 7.

    Röntgen (1895: 141): “Now it has been known for a long time that, in addition to transverse light oscillations, longitudinal oscillations can also occur in the aether and, in the opinion of various physicists, must occur. Obviously, their existence has not yet been proven and therefore their properties have not yet been experimentally investigated. Shouldn’t these new rays be longitudinal swinging motions of the aether? I must confess that during the course of the investigations I have become more and more attached to this thought and thus also permit myself to express this conjecture here, although I am very well aware that the explanation given still requires further substantiation”.

  8. 8.

    Peter Paul Koch built a recording microphotometer at the Physical Institute in Munich to conduct objective analysis of the results (Wolfke 1912). However, those measurements of the diffraction recordings yielded no clear proof of any wavelike character either. Potential fluorescence radiation due to the metallic slit emitting radiation upon irradiation was not discussed.

  9. 9.

    Ewald (1968: 541) describes a lecture by Laue before his appointment, ‘On the behavior of light waves at the focal point’ (Das Verhalten von Lichtwellen im Brennpunkt). See also Boeters and Lemmerich 1979: 56.

  10. 10.

    Laue to Westphal, Munich, 23 [25?] May 1912. Private holding. Quoted without any source by Gerhardt Hildebrandt in Treue and Hildebrandt (1987: 229). See also Boeters and Lemmerich (1979: 59), there dated 23 May 1912.

  11. 11.

    Laue to Sommerfeld, no location, 3 Aug. 1920. DMA, NL 056 (former shelfmark HS 1977-28/A 197). Related letters from Laue indicate how offended he was.

  12. 12.

    The archives of the Royal Institution of Great Britain in London have letters from William Lawrence Bragg on the timing of the joint research beginning in the summer of 1912: W.L. Bragg to John Desmond Bernal, 30 Oct. 1942. RI MS WlB/49b/42p.; W.L. Bragg to Lord Rayleigh, 9 Sep. 1942. RI MS, WLB/49b/36: 1.

  13. 13.

    Betrifft Gesuch des Herrn Prof. Dr. v. Laue. GSta PK, I HA, Rep. 76, Kultusministerium, Va, Sekt. 2, Tit IV, no. 68 D, vol. 1, fol. 208.

References

  • Authier, André. 2013. Early Days of X-Ray Crystallography. Oxford: Univ. Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barkla, Charles G. 1908. Der Stand der Forschung über die sekundäre Röntgenstrahlung. Jb. Radioakt. Electr. 5: 246–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeters, Karl E., and Jost Lemmerich, eds. 1979. Gedächtnisausstellung zum 100. Geburtstag von Albert Einstein, Otto Hahn, Max von Laue, Lise Meitner in der Staatsbibliothek Berlin Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Exhibition catalogue. Berlin: Staatsbibliothek Preußischer Kulturbesitz

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, Max. 1912. M. Laue. Das Relativitätsprinzip. Phys. Z. 13: 175 f. (book review)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, W. H. 1911. Corpuscular radiation. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. 80th Meeting at Portsmouth, 31 Aug.–7 Sept. 1911: 340 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budde, E. 1911. Zur Theorie des Michelsonschen Versuches. Phys. Z. 12: 979–991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Michael. 2012. Disputed discovery: The beginnings of X-ray diffraction in crystals in 1912 and its repercussions. Z. Kristall. 227: 29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Michael. 2013. Arnold Sommerfeld. Atomphysiker und Kulturbote 1868–1951. Eine Biographie. Göttingen: Wallstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Michael, and W. Pricha. 1984. Die ersten Briefe Albert Einsteins an Arnold Sommerfeld. Erstveröffentlichung von bisher unbeachteten Briefen. Phys. Bl. 2: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert. 1993. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 5: The Swiss Years, Correspondence 1902–1914. Edited by Martin J. Klein, A.J. Kox, and Robert Schulmann. Princeton: Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, Paul Peter. 1968. Erinnerungen an die Anfänge des Münchener Physikalischen Kolloquiums. Phys. Bl. 24: 538–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, Paul Peter. 1979. Max v. Laue – Mensch und Werk. Memorial address held in Berlin on 2 March 1979. Phys. Bl. 8: 337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fölsing, Albrecht. 2004. Albert Einstein. Eine Biographie. 6th ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Walter. 1912. Räumliche Intensitätsverteilung der X-Strahlen, die von einer Platinantikathode ausgehen. Ann. Phys. 12: 377–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Walter. 1922. Die Geschichte der Auffindung der Röntgenstrahlinterferenzen. In Zehn Jahre Laue-Diagramm. Naturw. 16: 363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, W., P. Knipping u. M. Laue. 1912. Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen. Sb. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., math.-phys. class 1912: 303–322, 363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Haga, Herman, and Cornelis H. Wind. 1903. Die Beugung der Röntgenstrahlen. Ann. Phys. 2: 305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Hans. 1952. Schöpfer des neuen Weltbildes. Große Physiker unserer Zeit. Bonn: Athenäum-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, Armin. 1994. Einstein. Der Weltweise und sein Jahrhundert. Eine Biographie. Munich, Zurich: Piper

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, Gerhardt, and Wilhelm Treue, eds. 1987. Berlinische Lebensbilder. Vol. 1: Naturwissenschaftler. Einzelveröffentlichungen der Historischen Kommission zu Berlin, no. 60. Berlin: Colloquium-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioffe, Abram F. 1967. Begegnung mit Physikern. Basel: Teubner

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Felix, and Arnold Sommerfeld. 1965. Über die Theorie des Kreisels. 4 issues, 1897–1910. Reprinting of the original editions from 1897, 1898, 1903, and 1910. Stuttgart: Teubner

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubbinga, Henk. 2012. Crystallography from Haüy to Laue: controversies on the molecular and atomistic nature of solids. Z. Crystall. 227: 1–26

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1907. Die Mitführung des Lichtes durch bewegte Körper nach dem Relativitätsprinzip. Ann. Phys. 10: 989 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1909a. Zur Thermodynamik der Gitterbeugung. Ann. Phys. 12: 225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1909b. Thermodynamische Betrachtungen über die Beugung der Strahlung. Phys. Z. 32: 807

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1910a. Zur Thermodynamik der Beugung. Ann. Phys. 3: 547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1910b. Die Wärmestrahlung in absorbierenden Körpern. Ann. Phys. 10: 1085–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1910c. Ist der Michelsonversuch beweisend? Ann. Phys. 11: 186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911a. Das Relativitätsprinzip. Die Wissenschaft – Sammlung naturwissenschaftlicher und mathematischer Einzeldarstellungen, No. 38. Braunschweig: Vieweg; 2nd exp. edition 1913

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911b. Zur Diskussion über den starren Körper in der Relativitätstheorie. Phys. Z. 12: 85–87

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911c. Zur Dynamik der Relativitätstheorie. Ann. Phys. 8: 524–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911d. Über einen Versuch zur Optik bewegter Körper. Sb. Math.-Phys. Kl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 1911: 62, 405

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911e. Zwei Einwände gegen die Relativitätstheorie und ihre Widerlegung. Phys. Z. 13: 118

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1911f. Bemerkungen zum Hebelgesetz in der Relativitätstheorie. Phys. Z. 12: 1008 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1912a. Zur Theorie des Michelsonschen Versuches. Phys. Z. 13: 501–506. Budde’s reply is on p. 825

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1912b. Zur Theorie des Versuches von Trouton und Noble. Ann. Phys. 7: 370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1912c. Eine quantitative Prüfung der Theorie für die Interferenzerscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen. Sb. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., math.-phys. class, 1912: 363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1913a. Wellenoptik. In Sommerfeld (1913): 362–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1913b. Eine quantitative Prüfung der Theorie für die Interferenzerscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen. Ann. Phys. 10: 989–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max. 1921. Die Relativitätstheorie. Vol. 1: Das Relativitätsprinzip der Lorentztransformation. 4th exp. Edition, Braunschweig: Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max von. 1961a. Gesammelte Schriften und Vorträge. 3 vols, Braunschweig: Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max von. 1961b. Mein physikalischer Werdegang. Eine Selbstdarstellung. In Laue 1961a, 3: V–XXXIV

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max, and F. F. Martens. 1907. Beiträge zur Metalloptik I. Über die polarisation der von glühenden Metallen seitlich emittierten Strahlung. Dt. Phys. Ges. 5: 522

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, Jagdish. 1975. The Solvay Conferences on Physics. Aspects of the Development of Physics since 1911. Dordrecht, Boston: Reiche

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, Albert Abraham. 1903. Light Waves and Their Uses. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Edward W., and Dayton C. Miller. 1905. On the theory of experiments to detect aberrations of the second degree. Phil. Mag. 9: 669–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planck, Max. 1937. Zur 25-jährigen Jubiläum der Entdeckung von W. Friedrich, P. Knipping und M. v. Laue. Verh. Dt. Phys. Ges. 18th ser., 3: 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Röntgen, W. Conrad. 1895. Über eine neue Art von Strahlen. Sitzungsberichte der Physikalisch-Medicinische Gesellschaft zu Würzburg 1895: 132–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesson, Carl Gustav. 1920. Les Prix Nobel en 1914–1918. Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1899. Theoretisches über die Beugung der Röntgenstrahlen. Phys. Z. 1: 105

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1909. Über die Verteilung der Intensität bei der Emission der Röntgenstrahlen. Phys. Z. 19: 969

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1912. Über die Beugung der Röntgenstrahlen. Ann. Phys. 8: 473–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold, ed. 1913. Encyclopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen. Vol. 5 in 3 parts: Physik. Leipzig: Teubner

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 2000. Arnold Sommerfeld. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel 1892 bis 1918, Vol. 1. Edited by Michael Eckert and Karl Märker. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und Technik

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, Richard. 2008. Einstein’s Generation. The Origins of the Relativity Revolution. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobies, Renate. 2010. Morgen möchte ich wieder 100 herrliche Sachen ausrechnen. Iris Runge bei Osram und Telefunken. With a foreword by Helmut Neunzert. Stuttgart: Steiner

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouton, Frederick T., and Henry R. Noble. 1903. The forces acting on a charged condenser moving through Space. Proc. Roy. Soc. 72: 132

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Bernhard, and Robert W. Pohl. 1908. Zur Frage der Beugung der Röntgenstrahlen. Ann Phys. 4: 715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfke, Mieczyslaw. 1912. Über die Abbildung eines durchlässigen Gitters. Ann. Phys. 4: 797–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jost Lemmerich .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Basilisken-Presse, Natur+Text GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lemmerich, J. (2022). Private Lecturer at the University of Munich. In: Max von Laue. Springer Biographies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94699-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics