Skip to main content

Reflection: Beyond Capital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Capital in Classical Antiquity

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ancient Economies ((PASTAE))

  • 337 Accesses

Abstract

This essay considers what’s emphasised and what’s left out of a Roman economic history à la Piketty. In particular, and echoing some of Piketty’s critics, it suggests that another history of the 1%—Piketty’s focus as well as that of many of the essays in this volume—misses an opportunity to interrogate the well-being and economic strategies of the non-elite majority. Posing the Rawlsian question about the status of the worst off, rather than the best, forces us to confront some weaknesses of Piketty’s model, including the assumption of an economically static pre-modernity, and capital as a thing rather than a process. Rawlsian theory also leads us to ask whether the clear inequalities in the Roman world, as described in this volume, were balanced by improved conditions for the majority. The essay briefly re-examines the role of consumption, largely ignored by Piketty but emphasised in many of the articles here, as one possible path to a post-Pikettian ancient economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Scheidel 2017. See also Cook 2015.

  2. 2.

    Piketty 2014, 1.

  3. 3.

    Cook 2020; Adams 2014.

  4. 4.

    Scheidel 2017.

  5. 5.

    Wolf 2014; Rogoff 2014; Potter 2014; McCloskey 2014.

  6. 6.

    Piketty 2014, 94.

  7. 7.

    Piketty’s data sources must be excavated from the technical appendix to the book, available online: http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capital21c/en/Piketty2014TechnicalAppendix.pdf, p. 12. Maddison is Maddison 2010.

  8. 8.

    C.f. Lo Cascio and Malanima 2009 on pre-modernity, and McCloskey 2014 on other historical periods.

  9. 9.

    Bowes 2021.

  10. 10.

    Piketty 2014, 106–7.

  11. 11.

    Scheidel 2009; Scheidel and Friesen 2009; cf. Kay 2014.

  12. 12.

    Saller 1984.

  13. 13.

    Summers 2014; Gates 2014.

  14. 14.

    Stiglitz 2015; Homburg 2015.

  15. 15.

    Cook 2015, 15–16.

  16. 16.

    E.g. Wilson 2002, 2006.

  17. 17.

    Wallace-Hadrill 2008; Van Oyen and Pitts 2017.

  18. 18.

    Piketty 2014, Fig. 2.4.

  19. 19.

    Adams 2014.

  20. 20.

    Among which Vallier 2019; Gissurarson 2019; and Sunstein 2014, who, interestingly, thinks Piketty is arguing a Rawlsian difference principal.

  21. 21.

    Rawls 1971.

  22. 22.

    McCloskey 2014, 2016; see also Potter 2014.

  23. 23.

    E.g. Hitchner 2009; Jongman 2016; Erdkamp 2016; Flohr 2017; Kron 2019, among many.

  24. 24.

    For example, on the capital and investment by elites, Erdkamp, Verboven and Zuiderhoek 2020.

  25. 25.

    Piketty 2014, 631–2.

  26. 26.

    On labour see Cook 2015; Adams 2014; Rothchild 2021.

  27. 27.

    Bowes et al. 2021; Rowan 2016.

  28. 28.

    McCloskey 2016, 632.

  29. 29.

    Fülle 1997.

  30. 30.

    E.g. Helen 1975; Van Oyen 2020; Shaw 2020.

  31. 31.

    Vries 2008.

Bibliography

  • Adams, Thomas Jessen. 2014. “The Theater of Inequality.” Nonsite.org 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, Kim. 2021. “When Kuznets Went to Rome: Roman Economic Well-Being and the Reframing of Roman History.” Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 2.1: 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, Kim, Emanuele Vaccaro, Stephen Collins-Elliot and Cam Grey. 2021. “Non-Agricultural Production, Markets, and Trade.” In The Roman Peasant Project 2009-2015: Excavating the Roman Rural Poor, edited by Kim Bowes, 543–66. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Eli. 2015. “The Progress and Poverty of Thomas Piketty.” Raritan 35 (2): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Eli. 2020. “Naturalizing Inequality.” Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 1.2: 338–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdkamp, Paul. 2016. “Economic Growth in the Roman Mediterranean World: An Early Good-Bye to Malthus?” Explorations in Economic History 60: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdkamp, Paul, Koenraad Verboven and Arjan Zuiderhoek, eds. 2020. Capital, Investment, and Innovation in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flohr, Miko. 2017. “Quantifying Pompeii: Population, Inequality and the Urban Economy.” In The Economy of Pompeii, edited by Miko Flohr and Andrew Wilson, 53–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fülle, Gunnar. 1997. “The Internal Organization of the Arretine Terra Sigillata Industry: Problems of Evidence and Interpretation.” Journal of Roman Studies 87: 111–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Bill. 2014. “Why Inequality Matters. My Thoughts on Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century.” GatesNotes, October 13, 2014. https://www.gatesnotes.com/books/why-inequality-matters-capital-in-21st-century-review.

  • Gissurarson, Hannes. 2019. “Redistribution in Theory and Practice: A Critique of Rawls and Piketty.” Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines 25.1. https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2019-0004.

  • Helen, Tapio. 1975. Organization of Roman Brick Production in the First and Second Centuries A. D.: An Interpretation of Roman Brick Stamps. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchner, W. Bruce. 2009. “‘The Advantages of Wealth and Luxury:’ The Case for Economic Growth in the Roman Empire.” In The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models, edited by J.G. Manning and Ian Morris, 207–22. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Stefan. 2015. “Critical Remarks on Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century.” Applied Economics 47.14: 1401–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, Willem. 2016. “Italian Urbanization and Roman Economic Growth.” In L’Italia dei Flavi, edited by Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi, Elio Lo Cascio and Elena Tassi Scandone, 105–7. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Philip. 2014. Rome’s Economic Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kron, Geoffrey. 2019. “Comparative Perspectives on Nutrition and Social Inequality in the Roman World.” In The Routledge Handbook of Diet and Nutrition in the Roman World, edited by Paul Erdkamp and Claire Holleran, 259–72. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Cascio, Elio and Paolo Malanima. 2009. “GDP in Pre-Modern Agrarian Economies (1-1820 AD).” Rivista di storia economica 25.3: 391–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, Angus. 2010. “Statistics on World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1–2008 AD.” http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/oriindex.htm.

  • McCloskey, Deirdre. 2014. “Measured, Unmeasured, Mismeasured and Unjustified Pessimism: A Review Essay of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 7.2: 73–115. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v7i2.170.

  • McCloskey, Dierdre. 2016. Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Michael. 2014. “Capital in the Twenty-First Century: A Critique of Thomas Piketty’s Political Economy.” Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform 21.1: 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Kenneth. 2014. “Where Is the Inequality Problem?” Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/kenneth-rogoff-says-that-thomas-piketty-is-right-about-rich-countries--but-wrong-about-the-world.

  • Rothchild, Emma. 2021. “Where Is Capital?” Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 2.2: 291–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, Erica. 2016. “Bioarchaeological Preservation and Non-Elite Diet in the Bay of Naples: An Analysis of the Food Remains from the Cardo V Sewer at the Roman Site of Herculaneum.” Environmental Archaeology 22.3: 318–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2016.1235077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saller, Richard. 1984. “Roman Dowry and the Devolution of Property in the Principate.” Classical Quarterly 34.1: 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter. 2009. “In Search of Roman Economic Growth.” Journal of Roman Archaeology 22: 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter. 2017. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter and Steven Friesen. 2009. “The Size of the Economy and the Distribution of Income in the Roman Empire.” Journal of Roman Studies 99: 61–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Brent. 2020. “Social Status and Economic Behavior: A Hidden History of the Equites?” Ancient Society 20: 153–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2015. “New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth among Individuals: Part IV: Land and Credit.” National Bureau of Economic Research no. 21192. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21192.

  • Summers, Lawrence. 2014. “Thomas Piketty Is Right About the Past and Wrong About the Future.” The Atlantic, May 16, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass. 2014. “Why Worry About Inequality?” Bloomberg View, May 13 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallier, Kevin. 2019. “Rawls, Piketty and the Critique of Welfare-State Capitalism.” Journal of Politics 18.1: 142–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, Astrid. 2020. “Innovation and Investment in the Roman Rural Economy through the Lens of Marzuolo (Tuscany, Italy).” Past and Present 248.1: 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, Astrid and Martin Pitts. 2017. “What Did Objects Do in the Roman World? Beyond Representation.” In Materializing Roman Histories, edited by Astrid Van Oyen and Martin Pitts, 3–19. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vries, Jan de. 2008. The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Economy, 1650 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Andrew. 2002. “Machines, Power and the Ancient Economy.” Journal of Roman Studies 92: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Andrew. 2006. “The Economic Impact of Technological Advances in the Roman Construction Industry.” In Innovazione tecnica e progresso economico nel mondo romano, edited by Elio Lo Cascio, 225–36. Bari: Edipuglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Martin. 2014. Review: “Capital in the Twenty-First Century, by Thomas Piketty, Translated by Arthur Goldhammer, Harvard University Press Rrp£29.95/Belknap Press Rrp$39.95, 696 Pages.” Financial Times, April 15, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bowes, K. (2022). Reflection: Beyond Capital. In: Koedijk, M., Morley, N. (eds) Capital in Classical Antiquity. Palgrave Studies in Ancient Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93834-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93834-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93833-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93834-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics