Abstract
This chapter focuses on the assessment of the European Union’s (EU) role in conflict management and post-conflict development in Africa. It reveals that Africa is in a significantly different position within the global security architecture when compared to the situation prevailing prior to September 2001. To the EU, Africa is important for many reasons. Hence, the EU has elaborated a multi-dimensional approach to developmental and political challenges in Africa. As a global player, the EU is increasingly focused on promoting political stability, reducing conflict risks, and supporting democracy in partner countries. Also, there is a sense of responsibility toward Africa, which was made manifest in a generous development assistance policy pursued from the very beginning of the European Community in the late 1950s. During the past two decades or so, security concerns have increasingly supplemented the traditional European commitment to economic and social development of the continent. The EU has changed its policies toward the region in the years following September 11. The increasing reliance on military instruments for conflict management is the most conspicuous feature of this policy. It is a reflection of changing European interests toward the continent as well as a reflection of changes in institutions. This chapter concludes that, while strong national interests may affect the EU’s foreign policy including its development policy, if no member state has strong vested interests in how a crisis is managed, the EU institutions in Brussels and at the country level may formulate and implement a comprehensive approach effectively. Increasingly, the EU has recognized the basic understanding of the relationship between security and development, and has acknowledged that there is a close link between stability, peacebuilding, and development in Africa.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Lehtinen (2013), p. 1.
- 2.
Ibid., p. 2.
- 3.
Furness and Olsen (2016), pp. 105–119.
- 4.
Olsen (2009).
- 5.
Youngs (2004), pp. 305–323.
- 6.
Lehtinen (2013), p. 5.
- 7.
Cumming (2015), pp. 473–488.
- 8.
Lehtinen (2013), p. 8.
- 9.
European Commission (2001), p. 7.
- 10.
Ibid., p. 8.
- 11.
Zondi (2017), pp. 106, 109–110.
- 12.
African Union (AU) (2002).
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
Zondi (2017), p. 113.
- 17.
New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) (2005).
- 18.
Zondi (2017), p. 114.
- 19.
Miall (2007), pp. 31–32.
- 20.
Paris (1997, 2004), as cited by Miall (2007), p. 32.
- 21.
European Commission (1996).
- 22.
European Communities (2000), L 317/3.
- 23.
EU’s Development Strategy, 2006.
- 24.
Miall (2007), p. 41.
- 25.
See Ndikumana (2005), as cited by Miall (2007), p. 42.
- 26.
Miall (2007), p. 42.
- 27.
European Commission/High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) (EC/HR, 2013).
- 28.
Furness and Olsen (2016), p. 111.
- 29.
Council of the EU General Secretariat (2012).
- 30.
EEAS (2014, July 10).
- 31.
ICG (2014, April 10).
- 32.
European Council (2012, December 10).
- 33.
Furness and Olsen (2016), p. 113.
- 34.
ECHO (2014, 10 June).
- 35.
European Council (2014, April 15). Press Release 8773/14.
- 36.
Furness and Olsen (2016), p. 113.
- 37.
EEAS Factsheet, February 2014.
- 38.
Ibid.
- 39.
Furness and Olsen (2016), p. 114.
- 40.
Ibid.
- 41.
Olsen (2009), p. 22.
- 42.
Furness and Olsen (2016), p. 117.
References
Adejumobi S (1998) The crisis of election and democracy in Africa. Afr Q 38(2):29–53
Adibe CE (2003) Do regional organisations matter? Comparing the conflict management in West Africa and Great Lakes Region. In: Bouldon J (ed) Dealing with conflict in Africa: the United Nations and regional organisations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 105–114
African Union (AU) (2002) Protocol relating to the establishment of the Peace and Security Council. AU, Addis Ababa
Council of the EU General Secretariat (2012) Report
Cumming GD (2015) The European Union in Sudan: a missed opportunity? Round Table 104(4):473–488
ECHO (2014, June 10) Mali Crisis Fact Sheet. European Commission – Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection, Brussels
EEAS (2014, July 10) Fact Sheet. The EU and South Sudan. EEAS, Brussels
European Commission (2001) Communication from the Commission on Conflict Prevention. (Brussels April 4, 2001, COM(2001) 211 final). European Commission, Brussels. https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/cfsp/crisis_management/docs/com2001_211_en.pdf
European Communities (2000) Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of States of the one Part, and the European Community and its member states of the other part, Cotonou, 23 June 2000. Official Journal of the European Communities (2000), L 317/3
European Council (2012, December 10) Council conclusions on Mali. (3209th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting). Council of the European Union, Brussels
European Council (2014, April 15) EUCAP Sahel Mali: EU support mission for internal security in Mali established. Press Release 8773/14
Furness M, Olsen GR (2016) Europeanisation and the EU’s comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa. Eur Polit Soc 17(1):105–119
ICG (2014, April 10) South Sudan: a civil war by any other name. (Africa Report No. 217). Brussels
Lehtinen T (2013) The European Union’s approach to security, conflict prevention and development in Africa. The case of Uganda. Ecole des Hautes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris
Miall H (2007) The EU and the Peacebuilding Commission. Camb Rev Int Aff 20(1):31–32
New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) (2005) African post-conflict reconstruction policy framework. NEPAD Secretariat, Midrand
Olsen GR (2009) Conflict management in Africa: American and European Union Policies compared. (ISA 50th Annual Convention, 15–18 February 2009, New York, USA)
Youngs R (2004) A new approach in the Great Lakes? Europe’s evolving conflict-resolution strategies. J Contemp Afr Stud 23(3):305–323
Zondi S (2017) African Union approaches to peacebuilding: efforts at shifting the continent towards decolonial peace. Afr J Confl Resolut 17(1):105–131
Zondi S, Khaba B (2014) The Madagascar crisis, SADC mediation and the changing Indian Oceanic order. Afr Insight 43(4):1–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolarinwa, J.O., Yakubu, M.J. (2022). Assessing the European Union’s (EU) Role in Conflict Management and Post-conflict Development in Africa. In: Spiegel, E., Mutalemwa, G., Liu, C., Kurtz, L.R. (eds) Peace Studies for Sustainable Development in Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92474-4_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92474-4_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92473-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92474-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)