Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wind Energy and Solar PV Developments in the USA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Coming of Age of Solar and Wind Power

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

In 2019, the US annual energy consumption from renewable energy sources was higher than the coal consumption for the first time since 1885. The addition of new wind and solar capacity and the potential of hydroelectric and nuclear power, accounted for 40% of total electricity production in the United States in 2020. Currently, there is over 105 GW of wind power installed capacity in the United States; making the US the second largest country in the world in installed capacity. Wind power is the largest source of renewable electricity. The US solar market is growing rapidly as the industry expands innovative new technologies and reduces manufacturing and installation costs. Public interest in clean technologies and renewable energy has increased demand for solar power. The movement towards a sustainable energy infrastructure has encouraged consumers and businesses to demand renewable energy sources, such as solar power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. State Area Measurements and Internal Point Coordinates, January 1, 2020. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/2010/geo/state-area.html

  2. https://peakvisor.com/adm/usa.html

  3. Hupp CR (2000) Hydrology, geomorphology and vegetation of Coastal Plain rivers in the south-eastern USA. Hydrol Process 14:2991–3010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dougherty E, Morrison R, Rasmussen K (2021) High-resolution flood precipitation and streamflow relationships in two US river basins. Meteorol Appl 28:e1979

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woodhouse CA, Wise EK (2020) The changing relationship between the upper and lower Missouri River basins during drought. Int J Climatol 2020(40):5011–5028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Centers for Environmental Information. August 2021. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series/110/

  7. Shaw RH (1982) Climate of the United States, in handbook of soils and climate in agriculture. CRC Press, ISBN, p 9781351073073

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhandari S, Kalra A, Tamaddun K, Ahmad S (2018) Relationship between ocean-atmospheric climate variables and regional streamflow of the conterminous United States. Hydrology 5(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5020030

  9. Latner TA (2018) Cuban revolution in America: Havana and the making of a United States left. The University of North Carolina Press, ISBN 1469635461

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loyd JM, Mountz A (2018) Boats, borders, and bases: race, the cold war, and the rise of migration of the United States. University of California Press, ISBN, p 0520287975

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Terrence Hopmann P, King TD (1980) From cold war to Détente: the role of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the partial nuclear test ban treaty, in change in the international system. Routledge ISBN 9780429052187

    Google Scholar 

  12. Immerman RH, Engel JA (2020) Fourteen points for the twenty-first century: a renewed appeal for cooperative internationalism. The University Press of Kentucky, ISBN 978-0-8131-7902-5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Desenrode S (2018) World War :1 the great war and its impacts. Aalborg University Press, ISBN 978-87-7210-004-3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garon S (2020) On the Transnational destruction of cities: what Japan and the United States learned from the bombing of Britain and Germany in the second world war. Past Present 247(1):235–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson S, O'Malley A (2018) The institution of international order: from the league of nations to the United Nations. Routledge, ISBN 978-1-138-09150-4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woloch I (2019) Postwar moment. Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-12435-4

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick Cottrell M (2018) The league of nations: enduring legacies of the first experiment at world organization. Routledge, ISBN 978-1-138-93088-9

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKinney KE, Sagan SD, Weiner AS (2020) Why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima would be illegal today. Bull Atomic Sci 76(4):157–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2020.1778344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fathyasyifa Shabrina I, Ketut Surajaya I (2019) Why Hiroshima as the target of US atomic bomb in 1945. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol ISSN No: 2456-2165

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kort M (2018) The Vietnam war re-examined. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-107-04640-5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levy PB (1999) Blacks and the Vietnam war, in the impact of race on U.S. foreign policy. Routledge, ISBN 978-1-003-05915-8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Itzkowitz Shifrinson JR (2020) Eastbound and down: the United States, NATO enlargement, and suppressing the Soviet and Western European alternatives, 1990–1992. J Strategic Stud 43:6–7, 816–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1737931

  23. Leffler M (2017) Strategy, diplomacy, and the cold war: the United States, Turkey, and NATO, 1945–1952. Safeguarding Democratic Capitalism: U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security, 1920–2015. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888061-007

  24. Thomas C (2019) Afghanistan: background and U.S. Policy. Congressional research service

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dobbins J, Campbell JH, Mann S, Miller LE (2019) Consequences of a Precipitous U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan. RAND Corporation (2019) Stable. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep19894

  26. Butt AI (2019) Why did the United States Invade Iraq in 2003? Secur Stud 28(2):250–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1551567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yetiv SA (2018) The Iraq war of 2003. Why did the United States decide to invade? Routledge, ISBN 978-0-429-48904–4

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dodge T (2007) The causes of US failure in Iraq. Routledge, ISBN 978-0-429-33314-9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woolhandler S et al (2021) Public policy and health in the Trump era. The Lancet 397(10275):705–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McIntosh J, Mendoza-Denton N (2020) Language in the Trump era: scandals and emergencies. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-108-84114-6

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bomberg E (2017) Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment. Environ Pol 26(5):956–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1332543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vespa J, Armstrong DM, Medina L (2018) Demographic turning points for the United States: population projections for 2020 to 2060. Current Population Reports P25-1144

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts AW, Ogunwole SU, Blakeslee L, Rabe MA (2018) The population 65 years and older in the United States: 2016. American Community Survey Reports

    Google Scholar 

  34. The World Bank (2021) https://www.worldbank.org/en/home

  35. Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (2017) A history of California agriculture. Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics

    Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.usda.gov/

  37. Nordea. https://www.nordeatrade.com/en

  38. Tran TK, Sato H, Namatame A (2017) Key economic sectors and their transitions: analysis of world input-output network. In: Kreinovich V, Sriboonchitta S, Huynh VN (eds) Robustness in econometrics. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_23

  39. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.bea.gov/

  40. Luh S, Budinis S, Giarola S, Schmidt TJ, Hawkes A (2020) Long-term development of the industrial sector—case study about electrification, fuel switching, and CCS in the USA. Comput Chem Eng 133:106602, ISSN 0098-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106602

  41. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.commerce.gov/

  42. Yum S (2020) The relationship between creative industries and the urban economy in the USA. Creative Ind J 13(2):95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2019.1668741

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Expansión, Datos Macro. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/

  44. American Geoscience Institute. https://www.americangeosciences.org/

  45. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/

  46. Smith JL, Lee TK (2017) The price elasticity of U.S. shale oil reserves. Energy Econ 67:121–135, ISSN 0140-9883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.021

  47. Demirbas A, Al-Sasi BO, Nizami A-S (2017) Recent volatility in the price of crude oil. Energy Sources Part B 12(5):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1153751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson B (2019) Carbon nation: fossil fuels in the making of American culture. University Press of Kansas, ISBN, p 9780700625819

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Prăvălie R, Bandoc G (2018) Nuclear energy: between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications. J Environ Manage 209:81–92, ISSN 0301-4797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.043

  50. Lowry J (2017) Energy produced and carbon released from fossil fuels and the amount of alternative energy required as a replacement. In: Avoiding carbon apocalypse through alternative energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52195-4_2

  51. Harris TM, Devkota JP, Khanna V, Eranki PL, Landis AE (2018) Logistic growth curve modeling of US energy production and consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 96:46–57, ISSN 1364-0321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.049

  52. Shalaeva DS et al (2020) Analysis of the development of global energy production and consumption by fuel type in various regions of the world. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 952:012025

    Google Scholar 

  53. Coglianese J, Gerarden TD, Stock JH (2020) The effects of fuel prices, environmental regulations, and other factors on U.S. coal production, 2008–2016. Int Assoc Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.1.jcog

  54. Feijoo F et al (2018) The future of natural gas infrastructure development in the United states. Appl Energy 228:149–166, ISSN 0306-2619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.037

  55. Jin T, Kim J (2018) What is better for mitigating carbon emissions—renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:464-471, ISSN 1364-0321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022

  56. Kelly C, Onat NC, Tatari O (2019) Water and carbon footprint reduction potential of renewable energy in the United States: a policy analysis using system dynamics. J Cleaner Prod 228:910–926, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.268

  57. Best R, Burke PJ (2018) Adoption of solar and wind energy: the roles of carbon pricing and aggregate policy support. Energy Policy, 118:404–417, ISSN 0301-4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.050

  58. Dhar A, Anne Naeth M, Dev Jennings P, El-Din MG (2020) Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategy for solar and wind energy systems. Sci Total Environ 718:134602, ISSN 0048-9697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134602

  59. Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10846–10854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions

  61. Russel DR, Berger B (2020) US and China climate goals

    Google Scholar 

  62. Aiken JD (2021) The Biden climate plan

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fitzgerald T, Hassett K, Kallen C, Mulligan CB (2020) An analysis of vice president Biden’s economic agenda: the long run impacts of its regulation, taxes, and spending. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper, (2020-157)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Clevenger T, Lashof D, 7 Ways the Biden administration can reverse climate rollbacks

    Google Scholar 

  65. Maniatis K, Chiaramonti D, van den Heuvel E (2021) Post COVID-19 recovery and 2050 climate change targets: changing the emphasis from promotion of renewables to mandated curtailment of fossil fuels in the EU policies. Energies 14(5):1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Galvin R, Healy N (2020) The green new deal in the United States: what it is and how to pay for it. Energy Res Soc Sci 67:101529

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bloomfield J, Steward F (2020) The politics of the green new deal. Pol Q 91(4):770–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. South D, Vangala S, Hung K (2021) The Biden administration’s approach to addressing climate change. Clim Energy 37(9):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pielke Jr R, Lane N (2020) Memo for president Biden: five steps to getting more from science

    Google Scholar 

  70. Roach JA (2021) Exclusive economic zone. In: Excessive maritime claims. Brill Nijhoff, pp 154–175

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gruenberg M (2021) Biden makes it official: no keystone XL oil pipeline. Guardian (Sydney) 1947:11

    Google Scholar 

  72. Oxford Analytica (2021) US-Canada keystone XL pipeline project is abandoned. Emerald Expert Briefings, (oxan-es)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cartwright ED (2021) Climate and clean energy to take center stage

    Google Scholar 

  74. Choi H (2021) President Biden and climate change: policy and issues. Available at SSRN 3847183

    Google Scholar 

  75. Windpower Engineering & Development. Wind power was the largest U.S. renewable energy provider in 2019. April 16, 2020. https://www.windpowerengineering.com/wind-power-was-the-largest-u-s-renewable-energy-provider/

  76. American Clean Power. 2021 Clean Energy Labor Supply. https://cleanpower.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ACP-Labor-Supply-Report.pdf

  77. NS Energy. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/

  78. American clean power. https://cleanpower.org/

  79. WindPower, Engineering and Development. https://www.windpowerengineering.com/

  80. NS Energy Staff Writer. Top five US states for wind power production profiled. 02 Apr 2020. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/wind-power-states-us/

  81. Stromsta K-E (2019) New Jersey more than doubles offshore wind target to 7.5 GW. 19 Nov 2019. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/new-jersey-governor-more-than-doubles-offshore-wind-target-to-7-5gw

  82. Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Computing America’s Offshore Wind Energy Potential. 9 Sept 2016. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/computing-america-s-offshore-wind-energy-potential

  83. Crooks E. The disruptive potential of US offshore wind. 31 July 2020. https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/the-disruptive-potential-of-us-offshore-wind/

  84. Insight, S. U. S. M. (2019) Year in review; 2020

    Google Scholar 

  85. Renewable Energy World. U.S. solar saw record growth during the pandemic year. 3.16.2021. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/solar/u-s-solar-saw-record-growth-during-the-pandemic-year/#gref

  86. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Wood Mackenzie: U.S. will install 324 GW of solar capacity in coming 10 years. March 16, 2021. https://ieefa.org/wood-mackenzie-u-s-will-install-324gw-of-solar-capacity-in-coming-10-years/

  87. SEIA, Wood mackenzie power & renewables. Solar market insight report 2021 Q2. 15 June 2021. https://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-market-insight-report-2021-q2

  88. Shaping the grid of the future, FERC. https://www.ferc.gov/

  89. Wagman D, PV magazine. About 9.7 GW of large-scale PV set for 2021 delivery in US market. 29 Dec 2020. https://www.pv-magazine.com/2020/12/29/about-9-7-gw-of-large-scale-pv-set-for-2021-delivery-in-us-market/

  90. Misbrener K, Solar power world. Hecate Energy commences construction on 600-MW solar portfolio in Texas and Ohio. 21 May 2021. https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/05/hecate-energy-commences-construction-600-mw-solar-texas-ohio/

  91. Boretti A, Castelletto S (2021) Cost and performance of CSP and PV plants of capacity above 100 MW operating in the United States of America. Renew Energy Focus

    Google Scholar 

  92. Canadian Solar Industries Association (CanSIA) www.cansia.ca. Natural Resources Canada/Government of Canada

  93. Powering up Nevada a Report on the Economic Benefits of Renewable Electricity Development. A Renewable America. Jan 2015. https://energy.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/energynvgov/content/Media/DGA_Report_NV_v5_SMALL.PDF

  94. Venables M (2008) The bigger-[power solar]. Eng Technol 3(18):52–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. https://www.energy.gov/lpo/ivanpah

  96. Ho CK, Sims CA, Christian JM (2015) Evaluation of glare at the Ivanpah solar electric generating system. Energy Proc 69:1296–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Rib DM (1995) Environmental aspects of SEGS solar power plants (No. CONF-950725-). American Solar Energy Society, Boulder, CO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  98. County M, Infrastructure, A. S. Solana generating station

    Google Scholar 

  99. Gallego AJ, Fele F, Camacho EF, Yebra L (2013) Observer-based model predictive control of a parabolic-trough field. Sol Energy 97:426–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. https://www.abengoa.com/web/en/novedades/mojave/noticias/

  101. To, W. Solar power in the United States

    Google Scholar 

  102. https://www.energy.gov/lpo/genesis

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK

    Tariq Muneer

  2. Engineering Construction and Project Management, School of Civil Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Eulalia Jadraque Gago

  3. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

    Saioa Etxebarria Berrizbeitia

Authors
  1. Tariq Muneer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eulalia Jadraque Gago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saioa Etxebarria Berrizbeitia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eulalia Jadraque Gago .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muneer, T., Jadraque Gago, E., Etxebarria Berrizbeitia, S. (2022). Wind Energy and Solar PV Developments in the USA. In: The Coming of Age of Solar and Wind Power. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92010-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92010-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92009-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92010-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation