Skip to main content

Spacecraft for Deep Space Exploration: Combining Time and Budget to Model the Trend in Lifespan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 3 (FTC 2021)

Abstract

This paper develops a novel approach to modeling and predicting advancement in spacecraft technology for deep space exploration. As spacecraft lifetimes increase, ever more elaborate missions and even quasi-permanent bases become more and more possible. We use the NASA (National Aeronautical and Space Agency) yearly budget along with the time variable to model their relationship with spacecraft lifespans and compare the level of fit of our model with an exponential (generalized Moore's law) model. The results indicate that our model provides a better curve fit, suggesting the usefulness of NASA’s budget in predicting the progression of space exploration technology. Additionally, the evidence that the NASA budget has a statistically significant impact on spacecraft lifespans suggests that the government could increase future funding of NASA to foster quicker technological improvement in space exploration technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data was compiled into a Google Sheet file that can be viewed and/or acquired by accessing the following web address: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fpYB3pMHcq77vQPMvpkA-sWFPzr2zlcWnEsDyawVfyI/edit#gid=846789546.

References

  1. Bailey, A., Bui, Q.M., Farmer, J., Margolis, R., Ramesh, R.: Forecasting technological innovation. In: ARCS Workshops (ARCS), pp. 1–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, P.: Moore's law found to apply to evolution of technologies beyond transistors. Scientific American (2013). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/moores-law-found-to-apply-beyond-transistors

  3. Bardi, U.: John Glenn (1921–2016): the end of an era. Cassandra's Legacy (2016). https://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2016/12/john-glenn-1921-2016-end-of-era.html

  4. Benson, C.L., Magee, C.L.: On improvement rates for renewable energy technologies: solar PV, wind turbines, capacitors, and batteries. Renew. Energy 68, 745–751 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, C.L., Magee, C.L.: Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data. PlosS ONE 10(4), e0121635 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121635

  6. Berleant, D., Kodali, V., Segall, R., Aboudja, H., Howell, M.: Moore's law, Wright's law, and the countdown to exponential space. The Space Review (2019). https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3632/1

  7. Dosi, G.: Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy 11(3), 147–162 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott, G.: Figure 4: the population of space. Nefarious Plots. http://www.nefariousplots.com/figures/4, Accessed 15 Apr 2021

  9. Farmer, J.D., Lafond, F.: How predictable is technological progress? Res. Policy 45(3), 647–665 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, C., Berleant, D., Segall, R., Lu, S.: Steps toward quantifying advancement in space exploration. In: Proceedings of 20th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 2017, Orlando, FL, 8–11 July 2017, vol. II, pp. 106–112 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hicks, K.: Astronomy: It’s sad that human space exploration has stalled. Columbus Dispatch (2015). https://www.dispatch.com/article/20151106/NEWS/311069676

  12. Howell, M., et al.: Trends in technology development in the US and USSR during the Space Race. The Space Review (2019). https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3840/1

  13. Howell, M., Kodali, V., Segall, R., Aboudja, H., Berleant, D.: Moore’s law and space exploration: new insights and next steps. J. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 73, 13–17 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kodali, V., Duggirala, R., Segall, R., Aboudja, H., Berleant, D.: Travel to extraterrestrial destinations over time: some exploratory analyses of mission data. J. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 72, 58–66 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koh, H., Magee, C.L.: A functional approach for studying technological progress: application to information technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 73, 1061–1083 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh, H., Magee, C.L.: A functional approach for studying technological progress: extension to energy technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 75, 735–758 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafond, F., et al.: How well do experience curves predict technological progress? a method for making distributional forecasts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 128, 104–117 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MacDonald, A., Schrattenholzer, L.: Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29(4), 255–261 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mack, C.A.: Fifty years of Moore’s law. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 24(2), 202–207 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magee, C.L., Basnet, S., Funk, J.L., Benson, C.L.: Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 104, 237–246 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mollick, E.R.: Establishing Moore’s law. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 28, 62–75 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, G.E.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8), 114–117 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagy, B., Farmer, J.D., Bui, Q.M., Trancik, J.E.: Statistical basis for predicting technological progress. PLoS One 8(2), e52669 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Did you know? https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/did-you-know, Accessed 28 Oct 2020

  25. Nielsen, J.: Nielsen’s law of internet bandwidth. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/law-of-bandwidth, Accessed 27 Sept 2019

  26. Singh, A., Triulzi, G., Magee, C.L.: Technological improvement rate estimates for all technologies: use of patent data and an extended domain description (2020). arXiv:2004.13919 [econ.GN]

  27. Singularity Symposium: What is Moore’s law? http://www.singularitysymposium.com/moores-law.html, Accessed 15 Apr 2021

  28. SpacePunx: Population of space over time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Space_Population.png, Accessed 8 Oct 2020

  29. Specter, M.: A life of its own: Where will synthetic biology lead us? The New Yorker (2009). https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/28/a-life-of-its-own

  30. Sood, A., James, G.M., Tellis, G.J., Zhu, J.: Predicting the path of technological innovation: SAW vs. Moore, Bass, Gompertz, and Kryder. Mark. Sci. 31(6), 964–979 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Trancik, J.E., Cross-Call, D.: Energy technologies evaluated against climate targets using a cost and carbon trade-off curve. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6673–6680 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Triulzi, G., Alstott, J., Magee, C. L.: Estimating technology performance improvement rates by mining patent data. SSRN (2018). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2987588

  33. Walter, C.: Kryder’s law. Sci. Am. 293(2), 32–33 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wikipedia: Budget of NASA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA, Accessed 30 Oct 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng-Hung Tsai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsai, PH., Berleant, D., Segall, R.S., Aboudja, H., Batthula, V.J.R., Howell, M. (2022). Spacecraft for Deep Space Exploration: Combining Time and Budget to Model the Trend in Lifespan. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 3. FTC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 360. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89912-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics