Abstract
International large-scale assessments (ILSAs) are attracting global attention, but examining reasons for this sharp increase in demand is an under-explored area. Drawing on key concepts in policy borrowing research, this chapter synthesizes key explanations why ILSAs are so attractive to policy makers. From a demand side perspective, ILSAs captivate countries by projecting as follows: (i) the comparative advantage of numbers over narratives, (ii) the quest for a credible source of information in an era marked by a surplus of evidence, (iii) the weak link between national curriculum and some ILSAs, and as (iv) transnational accreditation of public education. On the supply side, two brand-new developments are identified: (i) the preoccupation with linking test accountability to “education is in crisis” and (ii) new ILSA derivative tools that urge countries to reconsider partial and non-participation. In the age of ILSA expansion and test-based accountability, countries are saturated in a surplus of assessments; yet, the predominant policy advice remains singular, and countries are discouraged from alternative non-standardized paths for measuring learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addey, C., Sellar, S., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2017). Forum discussion: The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare, 47(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1301399
Auld, E., Rappleye, J., & Morris, P. (2019). PISA for Development: How the OECD and World Bank shaped education governance post-2015. Comparative Education, 55(2), 197–219.
Ball, S. J. (2018). The tragedy of state education in England: Reluctance, compromise and muddle – A system in disarray. Journal of the British Academy, 6, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006.207
Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. University of Bristol and Policy Press.
Bendix, R. (1978). Kings or people: Power and the mandate to rule. University of California Press.
Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave.
Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013). What do international test scores really show about U.S. student performance? Economic Policy Institute.
Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.
Delaune, A. (2019). Neoliberalism, neoconservativism, and globalisation: The OECD and new images of what is ‘best’ in early childhood education. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 59–70.
Espeland, W. (2015). Narrating numbers. In R. Rottenburg, S. E. Merry, S.-J. Park, & J. Mugler (Eds.), The world of indicators. The making of governmental knowledge through quantification (pp. 56–75). Cambridge University Press.
Gorur, R. (2015). Producing calculable worlds: Education at a glance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 578–595.
Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598–616.
Grek, S. (2008). From symbols to numbers: The shifting technologies of education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 208–218.
Hartmann, E. B. (2016). Education outside the public limelight: The ‘parallel universe’ of ICT certifiers. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016, the global education industry (pp. 228–247). Routledge.
Jerrim, J. (2016). PISA 2012: How do results for the paper and computer tests compare? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 495–518.
Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25.
Karseth, B., Sivesind, K., & Steiner-Khamsi, G., eds. (2021; forthcoming). Evidence and expertise in Nordic education policies: A comparative network analysis from the Nordic region.
Labaree, D. F. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14.
Lawn, M. (2008). An Atlantic crossing? The work of the international examination inquiry, its researchers, methods and influence. Symposium.
Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302.
Lewis, S. (2018). PISA ‘Yet To Come’: Governing schooling through time, difference and potential. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(5), 683–697.
Lietz, P., Cresswell, J. C., Rust, K. F., & Adams, R. J. (Eds.). (2017). Implementation of large-scale education assessments. John Wiley & Sons.
Liu, J. (2016). Student achievement and PISA rankings: Policy effects or cultural explanations? In W. Smith (Ed.), The global testing culture: Shaping education policy, perceptions, and practice (Oxford studies in comparative education) (Vol. 25, pp. 85–99). Symposium Books.
Liu, J. (2019). Government, media, and citizens: Understanding engagement with PISA in China (2009–2015). Oxford Review of Education, 45(3), 315–332.
Liu, J., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2020). Human Capital Index and the hidden penalty for non-participation in ILSAs. International Journal of Educational Development, 73, 102149.
Lubienski, C. (2019). Advocacy networks and market models for education. In M. P. do Amaral, G. Steiner-Khamsi, & C. Thompson (Eds.), Researching the global education industry (pp. 69–86). Palgrave.
Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press.
Nóvoa, A., & Lawn, M. (2002). Fabricating Europe. Springer Netherlands.
Novoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–438.
Piattoeva, N., Gorodski Centeno, V., Suominen, O., & Rinne, R. (2018). Governance by data circulation? The production, availability, and use of national large-scale assessment data. In J. Kauko, R. Rinne, & T. Takala (Eds.), Politics of quality in education. A comparative study of Brazil, China, and Russia (pp. 115–135). Palgrave.
Robertson, S. L., & Verger, A. (2012). Governing education through public private partnership. In S. L. Robertson, K. Mundy, A. Verger, & F. Menashy (Eds.), Public private partnership in education. New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world (pp. 21–42). Edward Elgar.
Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2018). Improving the comparability and local usefulness of international assessments: A look back and a way forward. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 354–367.
Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.). Theories and methods in comparative education (pp. 25–83). Frankfurt/M, Germany: Lang.
Schriewer, J., & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 29–52). Teachers College Press.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725.
Silova, I. (2006). From sites of occupation to symbols of multiculturalism. Reconceptualizing minority education in post-Soviet Latvia. Information Age Publisher.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2021). Externalisation and structural coupling: Applications in comparative policy studies in education. European Educational Research Journal, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120988394 (forthcoming).
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Draxler, A. (2018). Introduction. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & A. Draxler (Eds.), The state, business, and education: Public-private partnerships revisited (pp. 1–15). E. Elgar.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Stolpe, I. (2006). Educational import in Mongolia: Local encounters with global forces. Palgrave Macmillan.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Dugonjic-Rodwin, L. (2018). Transnational accreditation for public schools: IB, PISA and other public-private partnerships. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1502813
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.). (2018). PISA for scandalisation, PISA for projection: The use of international large-scale assessments in education policy making. Half special issue of Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(5), 557–565.
Verger, A. (2012). Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public-private partnerships for education in low-income contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130.
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248–270.
Waldow, F. (2016). Das Ausland als Gegenargument: Fünf Thesen zur Bedeutung nationaler Stereotype und negativer Referenzgesellschaften [Foreign countries as a counterargument: Five propositions regarding the significance of national stereotypes and negative reference societies]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 62(3), 403–421.
Waldow, F. (2019). Introduction: Projection in education policy-making. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies. Bloomsbury.
Waldow, F., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2019). Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies. Bloomsbury.
Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review, 37(3), 576–610.
World Bank. (2017). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank.
World Bank. (2018a). The human capital project. World Bank.
World Bank. (2018b). Measuring human capital. World Bank.
World Bank. (2018c). Global dataset on education quality: A review and update (2000–2017). World Bank.
World Bank. (2019a). Regional human capital plan for Africa. World Bank.
World Bank. (2019b). Human capital project: First year annual progress report. World Bank.
World Bank. (2019c). Ending learning poverty: What will it take? World Bank.
Ydesen, C. (2019). The formation and workings of a global education governing complex. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s historical rise in education, the formation of a global governing complex (pp. 291–304). Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Liu, J., Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2022). Reasons for Participation in International Large-Scale Assessments. In: Nilsen, T., Stancel-Piątak, A., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Large-Scale Studies in Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88177-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88178-8
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education