Skip to main content

Regional Studies in Non-Western Countries, and the Case of SACMEQ

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Comparative Large-Scale Studies in Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 778 Accesses

Abstract

Large comparative studies within regions are rather new phenomena that are particularly visible in non-Western countries coinciding with a call for Educational for All. While individual countries in non-western regions have participated in some cases for decades in international large-scale studies, the presence of regional studies dates back only to the 1990s. These include studies found in Latin America, Francophone Africa, and Southern and East Africa as well as a recent international study focusing on the “developing countries.” In particular, the regional studies in Southern and Eastern Africa started in the latter half of the 1990s when concerted efforts of both the World Bank and former IEA researchers under the auspices of UNESCO initiated the Southern and Eastern Consortium for Educational Quality (SACMEQ) studies driven by policymakers.

This chapter outlines the main aims, designs, and frameworks of these studies, with a specific focus on SACMEQ. SACMEQ is of particular interest given that only policymakers within national ministries of education were appointed to lead the national efforts within each participating country and therefore had to be trained in research and assessment methods. The policy-specific lens and initial omission of a research imperative set SACMEQ apart at its initiation. These and other differences between the non-Western studies and the larger global IEA and OECD studies are discussed, including the specific relevance of the studies for participating countries. Finally, the chapter concludes with a brief reflection and outlook on upcoming changes related to the regional studies and their future orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addey, C. (2017). Golden relics & historical standards: how the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for Development. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2018). Why do countries participate in PISA? Understanding the role of international large-scale assessments in global education policy. In A. Verger, M. Novelli & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global Education Policy and International Development. Second Edition. (pp. 97–118). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers No. 187. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en.

  • Bottani, N., & Tuijnman, A. C. (1994). The design of indicator systems. In A. C. Tuijnman & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), Monitoring the standards of education. (pp. 47–78). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, H. I., & Singer, J. D. (2019). Assessment for monitoring of education systems: International comparisons. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. In: Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabaditsile, G. K., Galeboe, A. K., & Nkwane, T. D. (2018). SACMEQ IV project in Botswana: A study of the conditions of schooling and quality of education. Department of Educational Planning and Research Services Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONFEMEN. (2012). Améliorer la Qualité de l’Education au Tchad: Quels sont les Facteurs de Réussite? Évaluation Diagnostique PASEC-CONFEMEN 2e et 5e du Primaire Année Scolaire 2009/2010. CONFEMEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONFEMEN. (2013). CONFEMEN Programme for the Analysis of Education Systems: PASEC. CONFEMEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONFEMEN. (2014). “Subregional workshop on the role and place of assessment in education systems’ steering and reform: Policymakers workshop”, summary report. CONFEMEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONFEMEN. (n.d.). PASEC – Evaluations devoted to quality education for all. CONFEMEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Redwood Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U., & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessments in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264248373-en.

  • Engel, L., Rutkowski, D., & Thompson, G. (2019). Toward an international measure of global competence? A critical look at the PISA 2018 framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1642183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercikan, K., Arim, R., Oliveri, M., & Sandilands, D. (2008). Evaluation of dimensions of the work of the Southern and Eastern Africa consortium for monitoring educational quality (SACMEQ) and of its programme of cooperation with the international institute for educational planning (IIEP). November 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehrler, S., Michaelowa, K., & Wechtler, A. (2009). The effectiveness of inputs in primary education: Insights from recent student surveys for sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 45(9), 1545–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802663625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora Hewlette Foundation. (2014). Uwezo: Monitoring children’s competencies in East Africa. 9406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrouste, C. (2011). Explaining learning gaps in Namibia: The role of language proficiency. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (2004). Assessing student learning in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5849-9.

  • Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (2007). National assessments of educational achievement (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7258-6.

  • Grisay, A., & Griffin, P. (2004). Whats behind the acronyms (IEA, PISA, SACMEQ, TIMSS etc?) IIEP_InWEnt policy forum on cross national studies of quality of education: Planning their results and managing their impact. 17–18 June, 2004. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning – UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisay, A., & Griffin, P. (2006). What are the main cross-national surveys. In K. N. Ross & I. J. Genevois (Eds.),Cross-national studies of the quality of education: Planning their design and managing their impact. (pp. 67–96). UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. J. (1999). Challenges facing the reform of science education in South Africa: What do the TIMSS results mean for South Africa? In S. Ware (Ed.), World Bank Series on Science Education in Developing Countries. pp. 199–214. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. J. (2003). Language and other background factors affecting secondary pupils’ performance in Mathematics in South Africa. African Journal for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. (2004). A national assessment in mathematics within an international comparative assessment. Perspectives in Education, 22(2), 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. J. (2008). A historical overview of the IEA’s language-related studies leading to the implementation of the progress in international reading literacy studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802576726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. (2014). High-stakes testing in South Africa: Friend or foe? In T. Eggen, & G. Stobart (Eds.), High-stakes testing in education: Value, fairness and consequences (1st ed.). pp. 149–162. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773674

  • Howie, S., & Plomp, T. (2005). International comparative studies of education and large scale change. In N. Bascia, A. Cummings, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy. Kluwer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. J., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G. M., & Macleod-Palane, N. (2017). PIRLS literacy 2016: South African highlights report what is PIRLS? Participation in PIRLS cycles two types of PIRLS achievement assessments questionnaires (contextual) grade 4 PIRLS literacy attained sample grade 4 achievement in PIRLS literacy 2016. South African highlights report, December, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S. J., & Chamberlain, M. (2017). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Assessment (IEA). Reading performance in post-colonial contexts and the effect of instruction in a second language. Policy brief no. 14. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 14, 1–12. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED574333&site=ehost-live

  • Howson, G. (1999). The value of comparative studies. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education. (pp. 165–181). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungi, N. (2011). Accounting for variations in the quality of primary school education. Working paper, September, 1–44. http://www.sacmeq.org/sites/default/files/sacmeq/reports/sacmeq-iii/working-papers/07_multivariate_final.pdf

  • Hungi, N., Makuwa, D., Ross, K., Saito, M., Dolata, S., van Capelle, F., Paviot, L., & Vellien, J. (2010). SACMEQ III project results: Pupil achievement levels in reading and mathematics. Southern and Eastern African consortium for monitoring educational quality, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-005-6819-7.

  • Hungi, N., Makuwa, D., Ross, K., Saito, M., Dolata, S., van Cappelle, F., Paviot, L., & Vellien, J. (2011). Levels and trends in school resources among SACMEQ school systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2012). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. In M. O. Martin & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2011 and PIRLS 2011. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/methods/pdf/TP_Sampling_Design.pdf

  • Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: Trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.577337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. P. (1995). The world of school learning: Selected key findings from 35 years of IEA research. IEA Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T. (1996). IEA studies and educational policy. Assessment in Education, 3, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulpoo, D. (1998). The quality of education: some policy suggestions based on a survey of schools Mauritius Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development (Issue 1). UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauchande, C. (2018). Systemic Factors associated with changes in Grade 6 learners’ achievement in Mozambique. University of Pretoria. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

  • Leimu, K. (1992). Interests and modes in research utilisation: The Finnish IEA experience. Prospects, XXII(4), 84. Paris: UNESCO. pp. 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E., & Wagemaker, H. (2013). International large-scale assessments: Thermometers, whips or useful policy tools? Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makgeru, N. P. (2016). The effect of instructional efficiency on grade 6 learners’ mathematics achievement in Mpumalanga in the SACMEQ III. Masters Thesis, Unpublished, University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makuwa, D. (2005). The SACMEQ II Project in Namibia. A study of the conditions of schooling and the quality of education. Namibia Working Report. Ministry of Education and Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality, Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makuwa, D. (2011). Characteristics of Grade 6 Teachers. SAQMEQ Working Paper 2. September. UNESCO, Paris: IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade – implications for early learning. Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloi, M. Q., & Chetty, M. (2010). The SACMEQ III project in South Africa: A study of the Conditions of Schooling and the Quality of Education. South Africa country report. Department of Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloi, M. Q., & Chetty, M. (2017). The SACMEQ IV project in South Africa: A study of the conditions of schooling and the quality. Dbe, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, G., et al. (1993). A Southern Africa proposal for monitoring progress towards attaining the goals of the EFA Jomtien Conference concerning the quality of education. IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugendawala, H., & Muijs, D. (2020). Educational process factors for effective education in resource-constrained countries: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1702562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (eds.) (2013). PIRLS 2016 Assessment Framework. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center and IEA, Chestnut Hill, MA and Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwinyi, M., Wazir, K. M., & Salim, M. (2016, May). Sacmeq Iv report Zanzibar. pp. 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report. OECD Publishing, Paris. www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf.

  • OECD. (2015). PISA for development. www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisafordevelopment.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2015.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (1992, 1993, 1995–1998, 2000). Education at a glance. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passos, A. (2009). A comparative analysis of teacher competence and its effect on pupils performance in upper primary schools in Mozambique and other SACMEQ countries. PhD Thesis, Unpublished, University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T. J. (1998). The potential of international comparative studies to monitor quality of education. Prospects, 27, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T., Howie, S. J., & McGraw, B. (2003). International studies of educational achievements. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stuffelbeam (Eds.), The international handbook on evaluation. pp. 951–78. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwaite, T. N. (1994). Monitoring and evaluation in different education systems. In A. C. Tuijnman & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), Monitoring the standards of education (pp. 23–46). Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwaite, T. N. (1999). International studies of educational achievement: Methodological issues. Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. N. (1991). Sampling manual for the IEA International Study of Reading Literacy. Hamburg: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (1995). From Educational Research to Educational Policy: An Example from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Educational Research, (23) 301–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (2000). Some background information on the Southern African Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality. Internal report. IIEP/UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (2005). Sample Design. Quantitative Research Methods in educational planning. Module 3. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. N., & Genevois, I. J. (2006). Cross-national studies of the quality of education: Planning their design and managing their impact. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K., & Postlethwaite, T.N. (1991). Indicators of the quality of education: a study of Zimbabwean primary schools. Ministry of Education and Culture. IIEP: Harare/Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. N., et al. (2000). Translating educational assessment findings into educational policy and reform measures: Lessons from the SACMEQ initiative in Africa. Paper presented at the World Education Forum, Dakar, Senegal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K., et al. (2004). Chapter 2: Methodology for SACMEQ II study. IIEP, UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. N., Saito, M., Dolata, S., Ikeda, M., Zuze, L., Murimba, S., Postlethwaite, T. N., & Griffin, P. (2005a). Chapter 2 Methodology for SACMEQ II Study. Paris: IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. R., Saito, M., Dolata, S., Ikeda, M., Zuze, L., Murimba, S., Postlethwaite, T. N., & Griffin, P. (2005b). The Conduct of the SACMEQ II Project. In Onsomu, E., Nzomo, J. & Obiero, C. (Eds.), The SACMEQ II Project in Kenya: a study of the conditions of schooling and the quality of education. Paris: SACMEQ/IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACMEQ. (1995). Manual for data collectors (n.d.).

    Google Scholar 

  • SACMEQ. (2007). SACMEQ III: Main study manual for data collectors. UNESCO IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACMEQ. (2011a). Interview with Dennis Makuwa, February 2011. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACMEQ. (2011b). Policy brief no. 2. September, 2011, www.sacmeq.org

  • SACMEQ (2011c) Policy brief no. 1. September, 2011, www.sacmeq.org

  • SACMEQ Survey, 1995 for NRCs Appendix C(ii) Short description of the SACMEQ Survey B0206.

    Google Scholar 

  • SADC. (2010). Final record of the meeting of ministers responsible for education and training. Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, 18–19 March, 2010. In Biological conservation (Issue March, pp. 1–48). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0699-2.

  • Shimada, K. (2010). Student achievement and social stratification: A case of primary education in Kenya. Africa Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 92–109. http://www.sacmeq.org/sites/default/files/sacmeq/research/ResearchPapers/shimada.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks-Taylor, D., & Jenkins, E. W. (Eds.) (2000). Learning from others. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (2019). Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies. Bloomsbury. ISBN: 9781350057289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strietholt, R., & Scherer, R. (2018). The contribution of international large-scale assessments to educational research: Combining individual and institutional data sources. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258729.

  • Sylla, K., Saito, M., & Ross, K. (2003). SAMDEM: Sample design manager. International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Republic of Uganda Ministry of Education and Sports. (2017). Addressing the challenges of providing quality education for all in Uganda primary education policy suggestions based on Southern African Consortium for Monitoring Education Quality (SACMEQ) survey 2013. Kampala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., & Amadeo, J.-A. (2013). International large-scale assessments: Challenges in reporting and potentials for secondary analysis. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3). www.wwwords.co.uk/RCIE

  • UNESCO. (2000). In UNESCO (Ed.), Dakar framework for action, education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. www.unesco.at/bildung/basisdokumente/dakar_aktionsplan.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2012). EFA global monitoring report 2012: Youth and skills, putting education to work. UNESCO. http://unesco.nl/sites/default/files/dossier/2012_gmr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. In EFA global monitoring report.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2020a). Global education monitoring report, 2020: Inclusion and education. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2020b). Global education monitoring report. Summary report 2020. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265866

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2011). Learning for all: Investing in people’s knowledge and skills to promote development: World Bank group education strategy 2020. World Bank. http://biblioteka-krk.ibe.edu.pl/opac_css/doc_num.php?explnum_id=201

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Howie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Howie, S.J. (2022). Regional Studies in Non-Western Countries, and the Case of SACMEQ. In: Nilsen, T., Stancel-Piątak, A., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Large-Scale Studies in Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88178-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics