Skip to main content

A Novel Approach to Phasefield-Fracture for Inelastic Materials and Finite Deformations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Trends and Open Problems in Computational Mechanics

Abstract

An increasing number of areas in the field of fracture mechanics is addressed by the phasefield method for fracture. The fast development and improvement of the method in the last decade led to successful applications in brittle fracture for elastic and inelastic materials, for fracture at impact loads, fatigue, cohesive fracture and many more. However, several fundamental issues, like low convergence rate and consistent irreversibility formulation, require further investigations in order to obtain a powerful tool for general application to fracture mechanics. The manuscript at hand summarises recent developments in phasefield-fracture towards a realistic deformation kinematics at cracks, which yields the framework of Representative Crack Elements.

Peter Wriggers and I have a similar origin and a long lasting connection. Both of us were born in Hamburg. Main parts of our academic education were obtained in Hannover (Diploma, Doctorate, Habilitation) associated with late Prof. Erwin Stein. Over the decades, I have always enjoyed Peter’s stimulating support and steady driving force. Various coinciding scientific interests and activities with respect to computational mechanics like research on constitutive modelling, fracture mechanics, contact mechanics, in order just to name some areas, let to frequent dialogues. Currently, we collaborate within the national Priority Programme “Cyclic deterioration of high-performance concrete in an experimental-virtual lab”. I remember many nice and enjoyable social events in which we participated together associated with scientific activities all over the community. Moreover, strong interaction took place due to our common service to national scientific societies as Gesellschaft für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik (GAMM) and German Association for Computational Mechanics (GACM). Peter led both organizations in a dedicated and calm manner. I appreciate very much his company (Michael Kaliske).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaliske, M., Konopka, D., & Stöcklein, J. (2019). Neue numerische simulation für alte Holzkonstruktionen. In 23. Dresdner Baustatik-Seminar, Realität – Modellierung – Tragwerksplanung, pp. 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gebhardt, C., Konopka, D., Börner, A., Mäder, M., & Kaliske, M. (2018). Hygro-mechanical numerical investigations of a wooden panel painting from “Katharinenaltar’’ by Lucas Cranach the Elder. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 29, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mumford, D., & Shah, J. (1989). Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 42, 577–685.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. de Giorgi, E., Carriero, M., & Leaci, A. (1989). Existence theorem for a minimum problem with free discontinuity set. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 108, 195–218.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrosio, L., & Maria Tortorelli, V. (1990). Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t-convergence. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 43, 999–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Francfort, G. A., & Marigo, J. J. (1998). Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimisation problem. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46, 1319–1342.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Strobl, M., & Seelig, T. (2016). On constitutive assumptions in phase field approaches to brittle fracture. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2, 3705–3712. 21st European Conference on Fracture, ECF21, 20-24 June 2016, Catania, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Steinke, C., & Kaliske, M. (2018). A phase-field crack model based on directional stress decomposition. Computational Mechanics, 63, 1019–1046.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Storm, J., Supriatna, D., & Kaliske, M. (2020). The concept of representative crack elements for phase-field fracture: Anisotropic elasticity and thermo-elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 121, 779–805.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin, B., Storm, J., & Kaliske, M. (2021). Viscoelastic phase-field fracture using the framework of representative crack elements. International Journal of Fracture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-021-00522-1

  11. Storm, J., Yin, B., & Kaliske, M. (submitted). The concept of representative crack elements (rce) for phase-field fracture - non-linear materials and finite deformations.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blanco, P. J., Sánchez, P. J., Souza Neto, E. A., & Feijóo, R. A. (2016). Variational foundations and generalized unified theory of rve-based multiscale models. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 23, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simo, J. C., & Laursen, T. A. (1992). An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Computers and Structures, 42, 97–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Oden, J. T., & Pires, E. B. (1984). Algorithms and numerical results for finite element approximations of contact problems with non-classical friction laws. Computers and Structures, 19, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Song, S. H., Paulino, G. H., & Buttlar, W. G. (2006) . A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 73, 2829–2848.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hocine, N. A., Abdelaziz, M. N., & Imad, A. (2002). Fracture problems of rubbers: J-integral estimation based upon \(\eta \) factors and an investigation on the strain energy density distribution as a local criterion. International Journal of Fracture, 117, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kaliske .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Storm, J., Yin, B., Kaliske, M. (2022). A Novel Approach to Phasefield-Fracture for Inelastic Materials and Finite Deformations. In: Aldakheel, F., Hudobivnik, B., Soleimani, M., Wessels, H., Weißenfels, C., Marino, M. (eds) Current Trends and Open Problems in Computational Mechanics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87311-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87312-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics