Skip to main content

A Generalized Model for Scheduling Multi-Objective Multiple Shuttle Ambulance Vehicles to Evacuate COVID-19 Quarantine Cases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Sciences for COVID-19

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to present a generalized model for scheduling multiple ambulance vehicles from multiple ambulance centers assigned to evacuate COVID-19 patients. The proposed formulation is a multi-objective multiple 0–1 mathematical model as a new application of the multi-objective multiple 0/1 knapsack problem.

The scheduling aims at achieving the best utilization of the time shift as a planning time window. The best utilization of time is evaluated by a compromise between maximizing the number of evacuated people who might be infected with the virus to the isolation hospitals and maximizing the evacuated patients having higher relative priorities measured according to their health status. The complete mathematical model for the problem is formulated including the representation of binary decision variables, the problem constraints, and the multi-objective functions.

The proposed multi-objective multiple ambulances model is applied to an illustrated case study in Great Cairo, Egypt, the case study aims at improving the scheduling of ambulance vehicles in the back-and-forth shuttle movements between patient locations and the available multiple isolation hospitals with multiple ambulance vehicles. The solution procedure is illustrated while two efficient solutions for the case study with different numbers of evacuated patients are obtained. The proposed mathematical model is so general that it can be applied to cases covering the whole Governorates and even the whole country all over the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Ahram Gate website (2021) “The link between the patient and the doctor, rescue brigades are heroes inside ambulances”. Retrieved on 9 March 2021 at: https://gate.ahram.org.eg/News/2391717.aspx

  • Alaya I, Solnon C, Gheira K (2004) Ant algorithm for the multi-dimensional knapsack problem, International Conference on Bioinspired Optimization Methods and their Applications, (BIOMA 2004), 2004, 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Anany L (2003) The design and analysis of algorithms. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, p 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer GT, Algamal ZY (2019) Nature-inspired optimization algorithms in knapsack problem: a review. Iraqi Journal of Statistical Science 30:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglar A (2018a) Applications and solutions of knapsack problem: a literature review. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10921.08807. Retrieved at: file:///C:/Users/Dr%20Said/Downloads/knapsack.pdf

  • Biglar A (2018b) Some applications of knapsack problem preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15115.39209

  • Black J (2017) Ambulance services working collaboratively with community partners, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, 2017. Retrieved on May 15, 2020 at: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/John%20Black%2031.101.17%20pdf_1.pdf

  • Boone CM Avery LW, Malone TB (2015) “A research study of ambulance operations and best practice considerations for emergency medical services personnel”, Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate First Responders Group, March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Captivo ME, Climaco JCN, Figueira JR, Martins EQV, Santos JL (2003) Solving bicriteria 0-1 knapsack problems using a labeling algorithm. Comput Oper Res 30(12):1865–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlos AB (2017) Emergency medical service ambulance system planning: history and models. M. Sc. Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabane B, Basseur M, Hao J (2005) A practical case of the multi-objective knapsack problem: design, modelling, tests and analysis. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19084-623

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chekuri C, Khanna S (2006) A polynomial time approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 2006 35(3):713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleemput S, Dumon W, Fonseca V, Abdool Karim W, Giovanetti M, Alcantara LC, Deforche K, Oliveira T (2020) Genome Detective Coronavirus Typing Tool for rapid identification and characterization of novel coronavirus genomes, Bioinformatics, btaa145. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa145

  • Da Silva CG, Climaco JCN, Figueira JR (2005) Core problems in the bi-criteria {0,1} knapsack: new developments. Research Report 12, INESC-Coimbra

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva CG, Climaco JCN, Figueira JR (2006) A scatter search method for bi-criteria {0-1}-knapsack problems. Eur J Oper Res 169(2):373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva CG, Climaco JCN, Figueira JR (2007) Integrating partial optimization with scatter search for solving bi-criteria {0-1}-knapsack problems. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1656–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egypt Independent website (2021) Egyptian ambulance organization transports 150–170 people per day due to coronavirus. Retrieved on March 9, 2021 at: https://egyptindependent.com/egyptian-ambulance-organization-transfers-between-150-170-persons-infected-or-suspected-with-coronavirus-president/

  • Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X (2000) A survey and annoted bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization. OR-Spektrum 22(4):425–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Ghazali T (2009) Metaheuristics from design to implementation. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlebach T, Kellerer H, Pferschy U (2002) Approximating multiobjective knapsack problems. Manag Sci 48(12):1603–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Qulity SA, Mohamed AW, Bafail AO, Abdelaal RMS (2016) A multistage procedure for optimal distribution of preparatory-year students to faculties and departments: a mixed integer nonlinear goal programming model with enhanced differential evolution algorithm. J Comput Theor Nanosci 13(11):7847–7863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Qulity SAH, Mohamed AW (2016a) A generalized National Planning Approach for admission capacity in higher education: a nonlinear integer goal programming model with a novel differential evolution algorithm. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:5207362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5207362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Qulity SAH, Mohamed AW (2016b) A large-scale nonlinear mixed-binary goal programming model to assess candidate locations for solar energy stations: an improved real-binary differential evolution algorithm with a case study. J Comput Theor Nanosci 13(11):7909–7921. https://doi.org/10.1166/JCTN.2016.5791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidanova S (2004) Ant colony optimization for multiple knapsack problem and heuristic model. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidanova S (2005) Ant colony optimization for multiple knapsack problem and model bias. In: Margenov S, Vulkov LG, Wasniewski J (eds) Numerical analysis and its applications, LNCS, vol 3401. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 280–287

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fidanova S (2007) Probabilistic model of ant colony optimization for multiple knapsack problem. In: Lirkov I, Margenov S, Wasniewski J (eds) LSSC 2007, LNCS 4818, Berlin, pp 545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandibleux X, Freville A (2000) Tabu search based procedure for solving the 0−1 multiobjective knapsack problem: the two objectives case. J Heuristics 6(3):361–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Medical System (GMS) (2021) website, Ambulance Services. Retrieved on March 8, 2021 at: https://www.gmshospital.com/services/ambulance/

  • Gov. UK website (2021) Public Health England COVID-19: guidance for ambulance services, Updated 29 January 2021. Retrieved on March 9, 2021 at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-for-ambulance-trusts/covid-19-guidance-for-ambulance-trusts

  • Groşan C Oltean M, Dumitrescu D (2003a) A new evolutionary algorithm for the multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problem, Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics–ICTAMI 2003, Alba Iulia

    Google Scholar 

  • Groşan C, Oltean M, Dumitrescu D (2003b) Performance Metrics for Multiobjective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithms, In Proceedings of Conference on Applied and Industrial Mathematics (CAIM), Oradea, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunantara N (2018) A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications, Cogent Engineering (2018), 5: 1502242, Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Review article, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242

  • Hemamalini S, Simon SP (2010) Economic/emission load dispatch using artificial bee colony algorithm. In: ACEEE international journal on electrical and, power engineering, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Agrawal P, Ganesh T, Mohamed AW (2020a) “Scheduling Shuttle Ambulance Vehicles for COVID-19 Quarantine Cases. A Multi-objective Multiple 0–1 Knapsack Model with A Novel Discrete Binary Gaining-Sharing knowledge-based Optimization Algorithm”, in Data Science for COVID-19, Computational Perspectives, 1st. Edition, Paper No. 37, Elsevier, Academic Press, April 15, 2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Ayman YM, Alnowibet K, Agrawal P, Mohamed AW (2020b) Stochastic travelling advisor problem simulation with a case study: a novel binary gaining-sharing knowledge-based optimization algorithm. Hindawi, Complexity 2020:6692978. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6692978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen K (2009) Parameterized approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 2009 39(4):1392–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen K (2012) A fast approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2012(7147):313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji J, Huang Z, Liu C, Liu X, Zhong N (2007). An ant colony optimization algorithm for solving the multidimensional knapsack problems, [in:] Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2007, 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke L, Feng Z, Ren Z, Wei X (2010) An ant colony optimization approach for the multi-dimensional knapsack problem. J Heuristics 16(1):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerer H, Pferschy U, Pisinger D (2004) Knapsack Problems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klamroth K, Wiecek M (2000) Dynamic programming approaches to the multiple criteria knapsack problem. Nav Res Logist 47(1):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchta D, Rynca R (2019) The use of the multiple knapsack problem in strategic management of a private polish university case study. Int J Educ Manag 33(2):335–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Li W, Wang H (2015) The multiple knapsack problem with compatible bipartite graphs, The 12th International Symposium on Operations Research and its Applications in Engineering, Technology and Management (ISORA 2015), Luoyang, China, August 21–24, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Little AD (2019) Ambulance services–optimizing operations, rethinking emergency services for efficiency

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Yan Y, Liu Q (2018) A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for multiple knapsack problem with strong constraints, 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2018.8397892

  • Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering, structural and multidisciplinary optimization 26 (6), April 2004, pp. 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6

  • Microsoft webpage (2021) Define and solve a problem by using Solver. Retrieved on March 10, 2021 at: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/define-and-solve-a-problem-by-using-solver-5d1a388f-079d-43ac-a7eb-f63e45925040

  • Naidu K, Mokhlis H, Bakar AHA (2014) Multiobjective optimization using weighted sum artificial bee Colony algorithm for load frequency control. Electr Power Energy Syst 55:657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj N, Vitthalpura J (2017) Literature review on implementing binary knapsack problem. IJARIIE 3(5):2395–4396

    Google Scholar 

  • Render B, Stair RM, Hanna ME (2020) Quantitative analysis for management, 12th. Edition, BEARSON, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders D (2021) The heroism of health workers in the coronavirus crisis, The New York Times website, March 26, 2020. Retrieved on March 8, 2021 at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/opinion/letters/coronavirus-health-care.html

  • Shahrear I, Faizul B, Sohel R (2010) Solving the multidimensional multi-choice knapsack problem with the help of ants. In: Dorigo M et al (eds) ANTS 2010. LNCS 6234, Berlin, pp 312–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Soylu B, Köksalan M (2009) An evolutionary algorithm for the multi-objective multiple knapsack problem, International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, MCDM 2009: Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • The Lancet website (2020) A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Retrieved on March 09, 2021 at: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30185-9/fulltext

  • Ünal AN (2013) A genetic algorithm for the multiple knapsack problem in dynamic environment, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2013, Vol II, WCECS 2013, 23–25 San Francisco, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickram P, Krishna AS, Srinivas VS (2016) A survey on design paradigms to solve 0/1 knapsack problem. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 7(11):2229–5518

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization website (2020) Guidance for health workers. Retrieved on March 1, 2021 at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/health-workers

  • Worldometer website (2021) COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic. Retrieved on April 15, 2020 at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#ref-13

  • Zitzler E, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Fonseca CM, da Fonseca VG (2003) Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X-S (2014) Cuckoo search and firefly algorithm-theory and applications. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X-S (2015) Recent advances in swarm intelligence and evolutionary computation. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hassan, S.A., Mohamed, A.W. (2022). A Generalized Model for Scheduling Multi-Objective Multiple Shuttle Ambulance Vehicles to Evacuate COVID-19 Quarantine Cases. In: Hassan, S.A., Mohamed, A.W., Alnowibet, K.A. (eds) Decision Sciences for COVID-19. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87019-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics