Abstract
In France, the status of universities, and particularly of academic freedom, is comparatively weak when compared to other European countries. The chapter analyses the reasons for this shortcoming and the current threats to academic freedom in France. Of these threats, the increasing employment of legal defamation suits brought against academics is particularly striking. These actions were deliberately aimed at intimidating academics, so that they refrain from making use of their freedom. Another recent threat to academic freedom can be described as an “internal threat”, namely, the threat coming from student activist groups, who increasingly rely on social media to exert pressure on academics. In conclusion, it is not so much the state which academics should fear, but increasingly “the new forces for morality and good”.
Translated by John Jeremy Mossop.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The proof of this is that, in a recent work now recognized as authoritative, on the law of higher education the expression “academic freedom” does not appear in the index (Beignier and Truchet 2018).
- 2.
Translator’s note: the term “university freedoms”, as used in France, designates both the academic freedom of individual members of a university and the academic freedom of the university itself, seen as an institution.
- 3.
These two exemptions, which form part of the body of institutional guarantees granted to academics, regard both individuals (teachers and students) and the institution to which they belong (the university).
- 4.
This is the general sense of our 2010 book on university freedoms (see Beaud 2010a).
- 5.
- 6.
Nowadays we should point to the works of Pascal Engel, particularly his article in the European Review of History (see Engel 2020).
- 7.
The principal ideas can be found in the work of Epistémon (1968). This is a pseudonym for Didier Anzieu, then professor of psychology at Nanterre, so well-placed to know the “literature” produced by the students. I am extremely grateful to François Vatin for supplying this reference.
- 8.
Our reasoning here does not apply only to France, which is why we employ the concept which prevails abroad: that university members are university professors. Here France distinguishes itself (sadly once again) through this duality, which is symptomatic of the declining status of our universities and our professors.
- 9.
See the corresponding definition provided by Edward Shils: “Academic freedom is a qualified right; it is a privilege enjoyed in consequence of incumbency in a special role, an academic role, and it is enjoyed conditionally on conformity with certain obligations to the academic institution and its rules and standards” (p. 189 in Shils 1993).
- 10.
From the article by Vedel (1960) on the above-mentioned theses of Bernard Toulemonde and Camille Fernandes.
- 11.
- 12.
See conclusions of Donnedieu de Vabres, Conseil d’État 13th March 1953, Teissier, D. 1953.737.
- 13.
Conseil d’État 26th December 1930, Chauveau, concl. Ettori, S. 1931.III.18.
- 14.
This gradual erosion of university freedoms has not been slowed at all by the Council of State, which bears a heavy responsibility in the decline of the juridical framework of these freedoms, by refusing to take into consideration the audacious jurisprudence of the Constitutional Council (see below), and also by an equally systematic tendency to misjudge the particular nature of the status of academics by repeatedly including them in the category of ordinary state employees, which they obviously are not (see Chapter 4, pp. 149 and ff. in Beaud 2010a).
- 15.
See also here Beaud (2010a), and refer also to the chapter “Epilogue”, in which we allow ourselves a systematic criticism of the decision reached by the Constitutional Council on 10th August 2010 (pp. 287 and ff. ibid.).
- 16.
See Loi de programme n° 2006–450 du 18 avril 2006 pour la recherche, Article 41. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000426953. Accessed 6 March 2021.
- 17.
In the above-mentioned book (Beaud 2010a) we sight the case of a female historian who was oblidged to enrol in the doctoral school of a different university while her doctorate students had to be enrolled in the doctoral school of her own university, of which she was not a member. Absurdity reigns supreme, in absolute indifference, in French universities.
- 18.
Here we will leave aside the actions brought against historians who do not submit to this logic. Thus, the great American historian, Bernard Lewis, was found to be at fault, in civil terms, for his tendency to deny the Armenian genocide.
- 19.
TGI Paris 11 déc. 1994, Rec Dalloz. 1995, p. 511.
- 20.
The former President of the Republic (Sarkozy) and his adviser (Buisson) fell out after it was discovered that the latter was secretly (without the President’s knowledge) recording their conversations at the Elysée.
- 21.
The verdict is a reminder of the highly curious way, in which a foundation of this nature succeeded in being recognized as a state approved foundation when important politicians such as Michel Rocard and the Council of State were opposed to it in the initial stages. It was only intense lobbying by the Foundation that enabled it to obtain what it had at first been denied.
- 22.
TGI (Tribunal de grande instance de Paris) 17th chambre, 20 September 2010 (petition 09/04019), Franco-Japanese foundation named Sasakawa vs. K. Postel-Vinay, p. 9. Our thanks go to Me. Thierry Marembert, defending counsel, for having informed us of this verdict.
- 23.
See “Déboutée”. 22 September 2010. https://www.lesinfluences.fr/Deboutee.html. Accessed 3 March 2021.
- 24.
It was the subject of an editorial in one of the two most important French weekly juridical reviews: Jamin (2017).
- 25.
CA Paris du 28 Sept. 2017.
- 26.
The private parties in the court action were ordered to pay € 3000 of damages plus interest to Laurent Neyret and € 2000 to the director of the Revue, i.e. a total of € 20,000.
- 27.
It is well-known that this film provoked the anger of certain feminist groups, some of whom managed to prevent its being shown in certain Parisian cinemas.
References
Beaud, Olivier. 2010a. Les libertés universitaires à l’abandon? Pour une reconnaissance pleine et entière de la liberté académique. Paris: Dalloz.
———. 2010b. Les libertés universitaires. In Université, universités. Actes du colloque organisé les 22 et 23 octobre 2009 à Besançon, par le Centre de Recherches Juridiques de l’Université de Franche-Comté (Thèmes et commentaires), ed. Charles Fortier, 315–346. Paris: Dalloz.
———. 2010c. Academic Freedom: Les chemins américains de la liberté universitaire. Critique 755 (4): 291–305.
———. 2019. La justice universitaire mise sous la tutelle du Conseil d’Etat. Le blog de Jus Politicum. Accessed 3 February 2021. http://blog.juspoliticum.com/2019/07/05/la-justice-universitaire-mise-sous-la-tutelle-du-conseil-detat-le-coup-de-grace-donne-au-principe-constitutionnel-dindependance-des-universitaires-2-2-par-olivier-beaud/.
———. 2020. Reflections on the Concept of Academic Freedom. European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire 27 (5): 611–627.
———. 2021. Le savoir en danger. Menaces sur la liberté académique, Paris, PUF.
Beaud, Olivier, et al. 2010. Refonder l’université. Pourquoi l’enseignement supérieur reste à reconstruire (Cahiers libres). Paris: La Découverte.
Beignier, Bernard, and Didier Truchet, eds. 2018. Droit de l’enseignement supérieur. Issy-les-Moulineaux: L.G.D.J.
Delgrange, Xavier. 2007. La liberté académique. In En hommage à Francis Delpérée. Itinéraires d’un constitutionnaliste, ed. Robert Andersen, et al., 407–424. Bruxelles and Paris: Bruylant, L.G.D.J.
———. 2019. Doctrine: Qui la liberté académique délivre-t-elle de qui? Journal des tribunaux 6769: 293–305.
Dubreuil, Laurent. 2019. La dictature des identités (Le débat). Paris: Gallimard.
Engel, Pascal. 2020. L’idée d’une université et la liberté académique. European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire 27 (5): 598–610.
Epistémon. 1968. Ces idées qui ont ébranlé la France. Nanterre, novembre 1967–juin 1968. Paris: Fayard.
Fernandes, Camille. 2017. Des libertés universitaires en France. Etude de droit public sur la soumission de l’enseignant-chercheur au statut général des fonctionnaires. PhD thesis Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté.
Hook, Sydney. 1970. Academic Freedom and Academic Anarchy. 2nd ed. New York: Cowles Book Co.
Jamin, Christophe. 2017. La doctrine baillonnée. Recueil Dalloz 8: 401.
Jourde, Pierre. 2020. Tous ensemble contre le fascisme dans les écoles d’art. Publié sur son blog de l’Obs, le 13 février 2020. Accessed 3 February 2021. https://www.nouvelobs.com/les-chroniques-de-pierre-jourde/20200213.OBS24809/tous-ensemble-contre-le-fascisme-dans-les-ecole-d-art.html.
L’indépendance des chercheurs n’est pas négociable. 2019. Le Monde, 27 March. Accessed 3 March 2021. https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2019/03/27/l-independance-des-chercheurs-n-est-pas-negociable_5442191_3212.html.
Lami, Arnaud. 2015. Tutelle et contrôle de l’Etat sur les universités françaises, mythe et réalité. Préface de Jean-Marie Pontier (Bibliothèque de droit public 292). Paris: L.G.D.J.
Legrand, André. 2008. L’indépendance des professeurs d’université face à la formation doctorale. Actualité juridique, droit administratif 40: 2238–2242.
Letourneau, Philippe. 1995. La plume professorale est libre! Recueil Dalloz 35: 273–274.
Mazeaud, Denis. 2017. Doctrine, sois serve et tais-toi! La Gazette du Palais (14 February) 7: 3.
Post, Robert C. 2006. The Structure of Academic Freedom. In Academic Freedom after September 11, ed. Beshara Doumani, 61–106. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
Post, Robert C., and Matthew W. Finkin. 2009. For the Common Good. Principles of American Academic Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Prüm, André, and Rusen Ergec. 2010. La liberté académique. Revue du Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et à l’Etranger 1: 3–28.
Rapport sur les procédures bâillons. 2017. Accessed 6 March 2021. https://cache.media.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/file/2017/50/2/Rapport_Commission_Mazeaud_754502.pdf.
Ricœur, Paul. 1964. Faire l’Université. Esprit. Nouvelle Série 328 (5/6): 1162–1172.
———. 1968. Réforme et révolution dans l’Université. Esprit. Nouvelle Série 372 (6/7): 987–1002. Reprinted in Ricœur (1991), 380–397.
———. 1969. Trois ripostes à la crise universitaire (Préface). In Conceptions de l’université (Citoyens 1), ed. Jacques H. Drèze and Jean Debelle, 8–22. Paris: Éditions universitaires.
———. 1991. Lectures. Vol. 1: Autour du Politique (La couleur des idées). Paris: Seuil.
Shils, Edward. 1993. Do We Still Need Academic Freedom? The American Scholar 62 (2): 187–209.
Simon-Nahum, Perrine. 2007. Le scandale de la Vie de Jésus de Renan. Du succès littéraire comme mode d’échec de la science. Mil neuf cent. Revue d’histoire intellectuelle 25 (1): 61–74.
Singer, Claude. 1992. Vichy, l’université et les Juifs. Les silences et la mémoire. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Talon-Hugon, Carole. 2019. L’art sous contrôle. Nouvel agenda sociétal et censures militantes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Toulemonde, Bernard. 1971. Les Libertés et franchises universitaires en France. 2 Volumes, PhD thesis Université Lille II.
Vedel, Georges. 1960. Les libertés universitaires. Revue de l’enseignement supérieur 3: 134–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beaud, O. (2022). Academic Freedom in France: A Concept Neglected and Liberties under Threat. In: De Gennaro, I., Hofmeister, H., Lüfter, R. (eds) Academic Freedom in the European Context. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86931-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86931-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86930-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86931-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)