Abstract
Inaccuracy of buses is a common situation. A common practice is that a certain amount of slack is usually added to the schedule of bus operation, so that the bus can execute the schedule in most cases. On the other hand, slack means that buses sometimes have to wait for a while at the station or slow down while driving. Since the bus cannot accelerate the driving process by itself, this method cannot make the bus fully implement the schedule. Researchers invented the Transit signal priority (TSP) and conditional signal priority (CSP), the purpose of which is to give the bus signal priority to speed up when it is delayed to a certain extent. Some previous work has studied the driving process of buses with CSP. However, there is still room for further improvement in the mathematical description of the bus driving process based on CSP. In this article, we analyze the driving state of the bus under different CSP states, that is, positive and negative. Then a series of representative and operational assumptions are given. These assumptions can be used as the basis for future research on such topics. With the assumptions, we give a mathematical model of the bus driving process using CSP. According to some performance indicators of the bus driving process obtained in the modeling process, an optimization goal is established to comprehensively improve the driving effect of the bus. Mathematical analysis and numerical solution verify the applicability of the model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, P., Daganzo, C.F., Mannering, F.: Effect of transit signal priority on bus service reliability. Transp. Res. Part B Method. 132, 2–14 (2020)
Chow, A.H.F., Li, S., Zhong, R.: Multi-objective optimal control formulations for bus service reliability with traffic signals. Transp. Res. Part B Method. 103, 248–268 (2017)
Daganzo, C.: A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching. Transp. Res. Part B Method. 43(10), 913–921 (2009)
Daganzo, C.F., Pilachowski, J.: Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation. Transp. Res. Part B Method. 45(1), 267–277 (2011)
Iii, J., Eisenstein, D.D.: A self-cordinating bus route to resist bus bunching. Transp. Res. Part B 46(4), 481–491 (2012)
Janos, M., Furth, P.: Bus priority with highly interruptible traffic signal control: simulation of san juans̈ avenida ponce de leon. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1811, 157–165 (2002)
Newell, G.F.: Unstable Brownian motion of a bus trip. In: Landman, U. (eds.) Statistical Mechanics and Statistical Methods in Theory and Application. Springer, Boston (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4166-6_28
Xuan, Y., Argote, J., Daganzo, C.: Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: optimal linear control and performance analysis. Transp. Res. Part B Method. 45(10), 1831–1845 (2011)
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants 72021002, 71972146, 71771048, 71432007, 71832001 and 72071144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, M., Zhao, Y., Chu, F., Zheng, F., Chu, C. (2021). A Mathematical Model for Bus Scheduling with Conditional Signal Priority. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems. APMS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85906-0_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85906-0_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85905-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85906-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)