Skip to main content

Choice and Whose Rights We Are Talking About? Cruelty and Animal Rights… Justice, Genetics and Consensus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legibility

Part of the book series: Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics ((MPCC))

Abstract

Who gets to define and discuss ‘rights’? Issues of who and how knowledge is controlled. Violence towards animals in movies and movie-making. Cruelty as contiguous with loss of rights. State controls including the control and profiteering from ‘genetic’ material(ism). Darwin and Lamarck. Consensus, ‘faith’ and ‘belief’. Mutual respect and mutual aid leading to rights and dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: https://www.peta.org/features/hobbit-unexpected-cruelty/

  2. 2.

    For the links between abuse of animals and the spread of viruses that have made the leap (or potentially been encouraged to in the case of Level 4 bioresearch labs) we are lead more often than not to think of ‘wet markets’ or other such interfaces of slaughter and sale of animals, and especially of the vectors from say ‘reservoirs’ (e.g. bats) and ‘bush food’ markets, but intensive animal farming brings its own logistics of spread and also mutation. Consider the mink farms of Denmark (world’s biggest farmers of mink) and the mutation of Covid-19 late 2020: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/05/denmark-lockdown-north-mink-blamed-coronavirus-strain.

  3. 3.

    From the outset, in this discussion, I wish to differentiate clearly between the racist false science of eugenics so readily wielded and manipulated by the Nazis, from the ‘science of genetics’ across its history, but indicate the potential racist usage of genetics. The so-called ‘Father of DNA’, James Watson, is an example of the elision of fields—of ‘hard science’ being the companion of irrational racist and bigoted ideology: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/james-watson-racism-sexism-dna-race-intelligence-genetics-double-helix-a8725556.html.

  4. 4.

    Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (p. 232; Penguin, London, 2017).

  5. 5.

    See Polysituatedness (pp. 411–413).

  6. 6.

    For the poem, along with my comments that accompanied its appearance in an online discussion forum that brought the threats (from outside the discussion forum—such positions travel fast among the fascist accruals), see Activist Poetics: Anarchy in the Avon Valley (pp. 54–58).

  7. 7.

    When I started a process I didn’t complete for Irish residency, I had to have my fingerprints taken digitally and was told my fingerprints had vanished (‘Do you work with books?’ I was asked!).

    Fingerprints Lacking in Bantry

    Verse

    Verse To register a presence, the ancestral fingerprint irrelevant to the Garda, you place a finger on the glass glowing red, blood offering, and the officer says try again, roll your finger, take some natural oil from behind your ear and press on the glass again, roll your finger. And still no print will show. Decades ago your prints were taken in ink when there was still enough of you to show, confirm what they didn’t want. Have you worked with chemicals? Laboured on a farm or in a factory? That will do it, she says. I’ve seen prints of a bookish man of seventy that are so beautifully preserved he could still be a child. But yours aren’t even a shadow of what you were, burnt off and never coming back. Great storms a fortnight ago threw waves and seaweed up into the Garda station, picked away at the seawall. The tidal surge that will reach to the bay’s elbow, main town of the region. Mountains hold it in place, but denuded of their copper souls, they too have lost their prints. And the old forests have gone. Little is left of the stretches of oaks. And I have these blank fingers, these shiny hands, made of the emptying out, the tendency to go elsewhere and wear new worlds to the bone. We’ll deal with this situation at the next stage, she says, when residency wants more than prints, when you’ll pay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Kinsella .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kinsella, J. (2022). Choice and Whose Rights We Are Talking About? Cruelty and Animal Rights… Justice, Genetics and Consensus. In: Legibility. Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85742-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics