Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Nebraska: Livestock and Coal Loom Large

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food, Energy, and Water Nexus

  • 500 Accesses

Abstract

Mitigation of climate change requires the systematic identification and cataloging of emissions sources at city, state, and national levels. In this study, an inventory of annual greenhouse gas emissions from the state of Nebraska was created based on industry data, and emissions inventories were completed each year from 1990 to 2016. Nebraska’s net emissions were found to increase from 56.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMtCO2e) in 1990 to 87.4 MMtCO2e in 2016. Agriculture was found to be the sector with the most emissions (36 MMtCO2e) followed by electricity generation (21 MMtCO2e). In 2016, emissions from beef cattle made up 55% of agricultural emissions and 23.7% of net state emissions; if all beef were substituted with pork, net state emissions could be reduced by 17.9%. Coal for electricity had the largest increase in emissions from 1990 to 2016 (7.4 MMtCO2e) and made up 23.7% of the state’s net emissions in 2016. Net emissions per capita in Nebraska were found to be 46.2 metric tons CO2e per capita (MtCO2e) in 2015, which is more than double US average emissions at 18.4 MtCO2e, though potentially similar to those of other agricultural states when emissions from agriculture are included in state inventories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2008) Reducing methane in dairy and beef cattle operations: what is feasible. Prairie Soil Crop 1:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Carattini S, Carvalho M, Fankhauser S (2018) Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 9(5):e531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carattini S, Kallbekken S, Orlov A (2019) How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature 565:289–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coniff R (2018) The case for a carbon tax on beef. The New York Times. March 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (DSIRE) (2019) Detailed summary maps

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis SJ, Lewis NS, Shaner M, Aggarwal S, Arent D, Azevedo IL et al (2018) Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360(6396)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries M, de Boer IJ (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Sci 128(1–3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Ecology State of Washington (DEWA) (2018) Washington state greenhouse gas emissions inventory: 1990-2015 report to the legislature. Lacey, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Conservation Air Quality and Climate Division State of Vermont (DECV) (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions inventory update: brief 1990-2015. Montpelier, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Protection State of Maine (DEPM) (2019) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Augusta, ME

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Protection State of New Jersey (DEPNJ) (2017) 2015 statewide greenhouse gas emissions inventory. Trenton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Quality State of Oregon (DEQO) (2018) Oregon’s greenhouse gas emissions: 1990-2016 prepared for the Oregon office of carbon policy. Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transportation (DOT) (2018) Distribution, transmission, and liquid annual data 1990-2016. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2014) Annual energy outlook 2014: implications of low electricity demand growth. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2018a) Detailed state electricity data. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2018b) Nebraska state profile and energy estimates. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2018c) Detailed state data. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2019a) Petroleum sales and consumption: fuel oil and kerosene sales. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2019b) How much electricity is lost in electricity transmissions and distribution in the United States? Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2019) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2017. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R (2014) Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(33):11996–12001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2019) Highway statistics series. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueres C, Schellnhuber HJ, Rockstrom J, Hobley A, Rahmstorf S (2017) Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature 546:593–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J et al (2013) Tackling climate change through Livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • González AD, Frostell B, Carlsson-Kanyama A (2011) Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy 36(5):562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Von Schuckmann K, Beerling DJ, Cao J et al (2017) Young people’s burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions. Earth Syst Dyn 8:577–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices (HLCCP) (2017) Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(9):3232–3237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICF (2018) 2015 Chicago regional greenhouse gas emissions inventory. Fairfax, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF Consulting (2004). Emissions Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) Volume VIII: greenhouse gases. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection and STAPPA/ALAPCO, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2016) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (2018) 2017 Iowa statewide greenhouse gas emissions inventory report. Des Moines, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K). Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi DR, Ulrich-Schad J, Wang T, Dunn BH, Clay SA, Bruggeman SA, Clay DE (2019) Grassland retention in the North America Midwest after periods of high commodity prices and climate variability. Soil Sci Soc Am J 83(5):1290–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2018) Ingredion to spend millions of dollars on plant-based South Sioux City plant. Sioux City Journal, Sioux City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska AJ, Perrin RK (2011) Energy and climate implications for agricultural nutrient use efficiency. In: Clay DE, Shanahan JF (eds) GIS applications in agriculture, volume two: nutrient management for energy efficiency. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins A (2013) Reinventing fire: bold business solutions for the new energy era. Chelsea Green Publishing, Hartford, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar RJ, Fuglestvedt JS, Friedlingstein P, Grubb M, Rogelj J, Matthews HD et al (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. Nat Geosci 10:741–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morton O (2016) The planet remade: how geoengineering could change the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • NDA (2019) Nebraska agriculture fact card. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2018a) Population by age, nebraska. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2018b) Annual report 2017. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2018c) Motor vehicle miles traveled in Nebraska. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2018d) Nebraska motor vehicle registrations. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2019a) Electricity consumption in Nebraska by end–use sector. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • NEO (2019b) Energy prices in Nebraska’s electric power sector. Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305(5686):968–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N (2008) Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions. Agric Syst 98(2):67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R (2010a) Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agric Syst 103(6):380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Lammers P, Stender D, Pirog R (2010b) Life cycle assessment of high-and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agric Syst 103(9):599–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phetteplace HW, Johnson DE, Seidl AF (2001) Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 60(1):99–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poore J, Nemecek T (2019) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392):987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson J (2018) Can the world kick its fossil-fuel addiction fast enough? Nature 556:422–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) (2017) The Emissions Gap Report 2017. Nairobi, Kenya

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Division (UNPD) (2018) World population prospects 2017. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2018) 2018 population estimates. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Global Climate Research Program (USGCRP) (2018) Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the united states: fourth national climate assessment, Volume II (eds. Reidmiller DR, Avery CW, Easterling DR, Kunkel KE, Lewis KLM, Maycock TK, Stewart BC). US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 1515 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization (UHERO) and ICF (2019) Hawaii greenhouse gas emissions report for 2015. Fairfax, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA ERS (2012) Irrigation & water use. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA ERS (2019) Cash receipts by commodity. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA NASS (2019) 2018 State agriculture overview: Nebraska. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2018) Quick stats. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and Ecofys (2018) State and trends of carbon pricing 2018 (May), by World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (2018) Climate watch. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(10):4134–4413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ramanathan V (2017) Well below 2°C: mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:10315–10323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yumashev D, Hope C, Schaefer K, Riemann-Campe K, Iglesias-Suarez F, Jafarov E et al (2019) Climate policy implications of nonlinear decline of Arctic land permafrost and sea ice. Nat Commun 10(1900)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Katie Torpy, Calvin Harman, Richard Perrin, Rick Stowell, David Aiken, Michael Hayes, Joe Stansberry, and Marnie Stein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Eric R. Holley

  2. Departments of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Adam J. Liska

  3. Departments of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Adam J. Liska

Authors
  1. Eric R. Holley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam J. Liska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam J. Liska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nebraska Water Center, R.B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Chittaranjan Ray

  2. ICWaR (Interdisciplinary Centre for Water Research), Indian Institute of Science, Karnataka, India

    Sekhar Muddu

  3. The Ecological Foundation, New Dehli, India

    Sudhirendar Sharma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holley, E.R., Liska, A.J. (2022). A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Nebraska: Livestock and Coal Loom Large. In: Ray, C., Muddu, S., Sharma, S. (eds) Food, Energy, and Water Nexus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85728-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation