Skip to main content

Evaluating the Transformative Potential of Photovoice for Research into the Global Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market ((SAHLM,volume 1))

Abstract

Criminologists are increasingly considering ‘the visual’ within their research, both as objects of study and through the use of visual methodologies. Within this trend, Photovoice provides an innovative, collaborative, and empowering visual research method that allows for in-depth engagement with lived experiences, particularly with underrepresented and previously ‘unseen’ communities, with the intention to foster social change. Photovoice relies on meaningful collaboration between researchers and stakeholders, so that the research is co-created between researchers and participants, therefore democratising the knowledge generation and exchange process. This chapter considers the use and potential effectiveness of Photovoice as a visual research method to further our understanding of art crime. It is argued that criminological enquiry into the illicit trade of cultural objects would benefit from utilising Photovoice to shed light on un(der)represented perspectives and lived experiences to better inform the debate around the production, protection, trade and ownership of cultural objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note: pseudonyms are used throughout this chapter to protect the identity of participants.

References

  • Armstrong, S. (2017). Seeing and seeing-as: Building a politics of visibility in criminology. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 416–426). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, A. (2008). The civil contract of photography. Zone Books & MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M. (2003). Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangdel, L. (1989). Stolen images of Nepal. Royal Nepal Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1970). The consumer society. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1997). The system of collecting. In J. Elsner & R. Cardinal (Eds.), Cultures of collecting (pp. 7–24). Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (2002). Visual evidence: A seventh man, the specified generalization, and the work of the reader. Visual Studies, 17(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2012). Practical aesthetics: Events, affects and art after 9/11. IB Tauris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2002). Encouraging participation: Ethics and responsibilities. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 91–106). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, A., Pole, C., & Mizen, P. (2001). Picture this: Researching child workers. Sociology, 35(2), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A. (2017). Representations of environmental crime and harm: A green cultural criminological perspective on human-altered landscapes. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 523–539). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A. (2018). Representing the “invisible crime” of climate change in an age of post-truth. Theoretical Criminology, 22(3), 468–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N. (2014a). The internet market in precolumbian antiquities. In J. Kila & M. Balcells (Eds.), Cultural property crime: An overview and analysis on contemporary perspectives and trends (pp. 237–262). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N. (2014b). Auction houses and the antiquities trade. In S. Choulia-Kapeloni (Ed.), 3rd international conference of experts on the return of cultural property (pp. 71–82). Archaeological Receipts Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N. (2019). Through a glass, darkly: Long-term antiquities auction data in context. International Journal of Cultural Property, 26(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N., Dietzler, J., & Mackenzie, S. (2013). Trafficking in cultural objects: An empirical overview. In S. Manacorda & A. Visconti (Eds.), Beni culturali e sistema penale (pp. 19–30). Vita e Pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2014). Visual criminology and carceral studies: Counter-images in the carceral age. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 176–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capous-Desyllas, M., & Forro, V. A. (2014). Tensions, challenges, and lessons learned: Methodological reflections from two Photovoice projects with sex workers. Journal of Community Practice, 22(1–2), 150–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E. (2011). Images of torture: Culture, politics and power. Crime, Media, Culture, 7(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E. (2012). Just images: Aesthetics, ethics and visual criminology. The British Journal of Criminology, 52(3), 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E. (2014). Seeing things: Violence, voyeurism and the camera. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 134–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castleden, H., Garvin, T., & Huu-Ay-Aht First, N. (2008). Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1393–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, C. F. (1997). An examination of the constraints on mutual inquiry in a participatory action research project. Journal of Social Issues, 53(4), 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, C. (1969). Illicit traffic of pre-columbian antiquities. Art Journal, Fall, 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, C. (2016). Collaborative archaeologies and descendant communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, C. (2017). Plundered skulls and stolen spirits: Inside the fight to reclaim native America’s culture. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, D. (2010). Huaqueros and remote sensing imagery: Assessing looting damange in the Virú Valley, Peru. Antiquity, 84(324), 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, D., & Brodie, N. (2010). Quantifying destruction: An evaluation of the utility of publicly-available satellite imagery for investigating looting of archaeological sites in Jordan. Journal of Field Archaeology, 35, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, M. (2018). Photovoice as a method for the development of collaborative archaeological practice. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 5(2), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multimodal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E. (2012). Objects of affect: Photography beyond the image. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, R. J. (1997). Looting, collecting, and the destruction of archaeological resources. Nonrenewable Resources, 6, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). Action and knowledge–Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. Apex Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, W., & Healy, D. (2019). Lives and spaces: Photovoice and offender supervision in Ireland and England. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, W., & Stengel, C. M. (2018). Women’s voices made visible: Photovoice in visual criminology. Punishment & Society, 20(4), 411–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilgan, E. (2001). Looting and the market for Maya objects: A Belizean perspective. In N. Brodie, J. Doole, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Trade in illicit antiquities: The destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage (pp. 73–88). McDonald Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 97(4), 601–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Nepali Museum. (n.d.). About Us [online]. Retrieved June 9, 2021, from https://globalnepalimuseum.com/about-us/

  • Grady, J. (2004). Working with visible evidence: An invitation and some practical advice. In C. Knowles & P. Sweetman (Eds.), Picturing the social landscape: Visual methods in the sociological imagination (pp. 18–31). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A. (2001). The ethnographer’s eye: Ways of seeing in modern anthropology. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2012). Visual sociology. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, K. (2010). Opening the lens: Cultural criminology and the image. In K. Hayward & K. Presdee (Eds.), Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image (pp. 1–16). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D., & Fitzgibbon, W. (2020). Different ways of seeing: Exploring audience reactions to images of probation supervision. Qualitative Social Work, 19(4), 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (2003). Digging in the dirt: Ethics and “low-end looting”. In L. J. Zimmerman, K. D. Vitelli, & J. Hollowell-Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical issues in archaeology (pp. 45–56). AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C., Fleury, J., Perez, A., Ainsworth, B., & Vaughan, L. (2008). Using visual methods to uncover context. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersel, M. (2012). The value of a looted object: Stakeholder perceptions in the antiquities trade. In R. Skeates, C. McDavid, & J. Carman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public archaeology (pp. 253–272). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2008). A social constructionist framing of the research interview. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 429–444). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P. (2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, L. (2018). Thinking critically about Photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liechty, M. (2017). Far out: Countercultural seekers and the tourist encounter in Nepal. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linfield, S. (2010). The cruel radiance: Photography and political violence. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, B. M. (2010). Silence(ing), voice(s) and gross violations of human rights: Constituting and performing subjectivities through PhotoPAR. Visual Studies, 25(3), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. (2005). Going, going, gone: Regulating the market in illicit antiquities. Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S., & Davis, T. (2014). Temple looting in Cambodia: Anatomy of a statue trafficking network. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 722–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S., & Yates, D. (2016). Collectors on illicit collecting: Higher loyalties and other techniques of neutralization in the unlawful collecting of rare and precious orchids and antiquities. Theoretical Criminology, 20(3), 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital: Volume 1. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, V. A., Mahajan, S. L., & Tengö, M. (2018). Photovoice for mobilizing insights on human well-being in complex social-ecological systems: Case studies from Kenya and South Africa. Ecology and Society, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10259-230313

  • Matsuda, D. (1998). The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: Point, muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, J. H. (1986). Two ways of thinking about cultural Property. American Journal of International Law, 80(4), 831–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, E.-J., & Muir, R. (2020). Photovoice: A critical introduction. In L. Pauwels & D. Mannay (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 282–296). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. (1996). What do pictures “really” want? October, 77, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nørskov, V. (2002). Greek vases in new contexts: The collecting and trading of Greek vases—An aspect of the modern reception of antiquity. Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcak, S., Gathings, D., Childs, C., Mumford, G., & Cline, E. (2016). Satellite evidence of archaeological site looting in Egypt: 2002–2013. Antiquity, 90(349), 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2010). Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 545–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2017). Key methods of visual criminology: An overview of different approaches and their affordances. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 62–73). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, J. (1998). Photographs within the sociological research process. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 115–127). Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remembering the Lost. (2021). About. Retrieved June 7, 2021, from http://rememberingthelost.com/

  • Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual methodologies. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, J. (2006). Gods are leaving the country: Art theft from Nepal. Orchid Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijapati, A. (2020, February 21). Replicating Nepal’s stolen gods. Nepali Times. Retrieved from https://www.nepalitimes.com/here-now/replicating-nepals-stolen-gods/

  • Sijapati, A. (2021, January 28). Nepal’s gods return from exile. Nepali Times. Retrieved from https://www.nepalitimes.com/banner/nepals-gods-return-from-exile/

  • Smith, E. (2018). Illicit markets in the global city: The cultural property trade in Hong Kong. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, G., & Sharma, J. (2009). From insurgency to democracy: The challenges of peace and democracy-building in Nepal. International Political Science Review, 30(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, S., Shreshta, P., & Bjønness, H. (2017). Local right in World Heritage Sites: Learning from post-earthquake rehabilitation dynamics in the Kathmandu Valley. In P. Larsen (Ed.), World heritage and human rights (pp. 135–152). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Traue, B., Blanc, M., & Cambre, C. (2018). Visibilities and visual discourses: Rethinking the social with the image. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(4), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tythacott, L., & Ardiyansyah, P. (Eds.). (2021). Returning Southeast Asia’s past. NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1970). Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illciit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, No. 11806, 823 U.N.T.S. 231 (14 Nov 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beurden, J. (2021). Ongemakkelijk Erfgoed: Koloniale collectives en teruggave in de Lage Landen. Walburg Pers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2002). Contrasting images, complementary trajectories: Sociology, visual sociology and visual research. Visual Studies, 17(2), 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2020). Seeing things: Visual research and material culture. In L. Pauwels & D. Mannay (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 76–95). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., & Waterton, E. (2010a). Reading the visual: Representation and narrative in the construction of heritage. Material Culture Review, 71, 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., & Waterton, E. (2010b). Culture, heritage and representation: Perspectives on visuality and the past. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. (2015). A note on fieldwork in ‘dangerous’ circumstances: Interviewing illegal tiger skin suppliers and traders in Lhasa. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 595–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodgate, R., Zurba, M., & Tennent, P. (2017). Worth a thousand words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with Photovoice as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2659

  • Yates, D., & Mackenzie, S. (2018). Heritage, crisis, and community crime prevention in Nepal. International Journal of Cultural Property, 25(2), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (2010). The scene of the crime: Is there such as thing as ‘just looking’? In K. Hayward & M. Presdee (Eds.), Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image (pp. 83–97). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (2014). From object to encounter: Aesthetic politics and visual criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This fieldwork was supported by the University of Glasgow and the Scottish Funding Council through the Global Challenges Research Fund. I wish to thank the individuals and organisations who generously shared their time, experience and perspectives for the purposes of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiline Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, E. (2021). Evaluating the Transformative Potential of Photovoice for Research into the Global Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects. In: Oosterman, N., Yates, D. (eds) Crime and Art. Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84855-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84856-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics