Skip to main content

Proposal for a Classifier for Public Tenders for Software Based on Standard IEEE830

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cloud Computing, Big Data & Emerging Topics (JCC-BD&ET 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1444))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, governments and private sectors request industry software solutions through public tenders that use websites for mass distribution. Not only is demand organized, but a large number of software tenders is produced. This study focuses on the analysis of texts from these documents to characterize them efficiently in order to find a specific solution to the general problem of how to make a bid and how not to make a bid. An automatic classifier is proposed for the public tender process for software based on IEEE standard 830-1998, which categorizes text from a pragmatic point of view. Development phases and classification success rates are shown for each algorithm used in the different experiments. This system may be an alternative for the early analysis of public tenders for software with fuzzy requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McIvor, R.: Global services outsourcing. Cambrigde University Press, Cambrigde (2010).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844911

  2. Reyes, M., Llopis, J., Garcó, J.: El offshore outsourcing de sistemas de información. Univ. Bus. Rev. Econ. (38) (2006). http://ubr.universia.net/pdfs/UBR0042006080.pdf

  3. Silva, C.: “La subcontratación en chile: aproximacion sectorial”, Polis. Rev. la Univ. Boliv. 8(24), 111–131 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cleland, D.I.: Project Management Strategic Design and Implementation, fifth ed. McGraw Hill, New York, NY (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raigada, J.L.P.: Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido. Socioling. Stud. 3(1), 1–42 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE, “ Standard IEEE 830-1993: Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications. Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. IEEE, “IEEE Std 830-1998 IEEE Standard for Software Requirements Specification.” IEEE Computer Society (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glinz, M.: On non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Delhi, India (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2007.45

  9. Jureta, I.J., Mylopoulos, J., Faulkner, S.: Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering. In: International Requirements Engineering, 2008. RE 2008. 16th IEEE, 2008, pp. 71–80 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jureta, I.J., Mylopoulos, J., Faulkner, S.: A core ontology for requirements. Appl. Ontol. 4(3), 169–244 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barchini, G.E.: “Informática. Una disciplina bio-psico-socio-tecno-cultural,” no. 12. p. 3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martín Antonínn, M.A.: “Panorama de la lingüística computacional en Europa,” no. 1. pp. 11–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graña Gil, J.: “Técnicas de análisis sintáctico robusto para la etiquetaciónn del lenguaje natural,” no. 28. pp. 117–118 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abelleira, M.A.P, Cardoso, C.A.: Minería de texto para la categorización automática de documentos. PhD in Computer Science por Carnegie Mellon University, Madrid, España (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34(1), 1–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Granitzer, M.: Hierarchical text classification using methods from machine learning. Citeseer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Corso, C.L.: Aplicación de algoritmos de clasificación supervisada usando Weka. Córdoba Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Córdoba (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dapozo, G.N., Porcel, E., López, M.V., Bogado, V.S.: Técnicas de preprocesamiento para mejorar la calidad de los datos en un estudio de caracterización de ingresantes universitarios (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Ullibarri Galparsoro, L., Pita Fernández, S.: Medidas de concordancia: el índice de Kappa. Cad Aten Primaria 6, 169–171 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiménez, R.S.: La documentación en el proceso de evaluación de sistemas de clasificación automática. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información 30, 25–44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venegas, R.: Clasificación de textos académicos en función de su contenido léxico-semántico. Rev. Signos 40(63), 239–271 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. bin Othman, M.F., Yau, T.M.S.: Comparison of different classification techniques using WEKA for breast cancer. In: Ibrahim F., Osman, N.A.A., Usman, J., Kadri, N.A. (eds.) 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 15, pp. 520–523. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_131

  24. Liu, H., Li, J., Wong, L.: A comparative study on feature selection and classification methods using gene expression profiles and proteomic patterns. Genome Inform. Ser. 13, 51–60 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cunningham, S.J., Holmes, G.: “Developing innovative applications in agriculture using data mining” (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barnaghi, P.M., Sahzabi, V.A., Bakar, A.A.: A comparative study for various methods of classification. In: International Conference on Information and Computer Networks (ICICN 2012). IPCSIT, 2012, vol. 27 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Hochstetter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hochstetter, J., Díaz, C., Diéguez, M., Díaz, J. (2021). Proposal for a Classifier for Public Tenders for Software Based on Standard IEEE830. In: Naiouf, M., Rucci, E., Chichizola, F., De Giusti, L. (eds) Cloud Computing, Big Data & Emerging Topics. JCC-BD&ET 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1444. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84825-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84825-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84824-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84825-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics