Abstract
This chapter contributes to research knowledge on the meaning of material artifacts in students’ social interactions in technology-rich, creative educational spaces. In specific, drawing on sociocultural theorizing (Grossen, 2010; Vygotsky, 1986, 1997) and Wartofsky’s (1979) schema of mediating artifacts, we investigated the meaning of material artifacts in students’ social interactions during their engagement in hands-on creative science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) design and making activities in a school’s makerspace. The chapter illuminates students artifactmediating interactions in the makerspace and considers how these create opportunities and tensions for students’ creative and transformative learning actions. In doing so, it describes the transitional, progressive, and also tension-laden embodiments of material artifacts in students’ social interactions that account for routine, procedural, and/or imaginative future-oriented practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Buchholz, B., Shively, K., Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2014). Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture and Activity, 21, 278-297.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. (2019). Recovering the idea of a tertiary artifact. In A. Edwards, M. Fleer, & L. Bottcher (Eds.), Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development: Societal, institutional and personal perspectives (pp. 303-322). Springer.
Daniels, H., Tse, H. M., Stables, S., & Cox, S. (2017). Design as a social practice: The design of new build schools. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 767-787.
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., … Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.
Dey, I. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge.
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working. Orienta Konsultit Oy.
Fields, D., Kafai, Y., Nakajima, T., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2018). Putting making into high school computer science classrooms: Promoting equity in teaching and learning with electronic textiles in exploring computer science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 21-35.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using resources: Conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture and Psychology, 16(1), 37-62.
Grossen, M. (2009). Social interaction, discourse and learning. Methodological challenges of an emergent transdisciplinary field. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, & M. Cesar (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction. Theories in action. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907624_013
Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: A dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(1), 1-22.
Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-504.
Hetherington, L., & Wegerif, R. (2018). Developing a material-dialogic approach to pedagogy to guide science teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422611
Holbert, N., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Constructible authentic representations: designing video games that enable players to utilize knowledge developed in-game to reason about science. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9214-8
Honey, M., & Kanter, D. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 91-102.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
Kajamaa, A. (2011a). Unraveling the helix of change: An activity-theoretical study of health care change efforts and their consequences. Unigrafia.
Kajamaa, A. (2011b). Boundary breaking in a hospital: Expansive learning between the worlds of evaluation and frontline work. The Learning Organization, 18(4), 361-377.
Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019a). Double special issue “Young people, digital mediation and transformative agency”. Mind, Culture and Activity. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10749039.2019.1652653?needAccess=true
Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019b). Agency in the making: Analyzing students’ transformative agency in a school-based makerspace. Mind, Culture and Activity, 26(3), 266-281. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2019.1647547
Kajamaa, A., Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2018). Digital learning environment mediating students’ funds of knowledge and knowledge creation. Studia Paedagogica, 23(4), 49-66.
Keune, A., Peppler, K. A., & Wohlwend, K. A. (2019). Recognition in makerspaces: Supporting opportunities for women to “make” a STEM career. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 368-380.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects. Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(4), 1-30.
Kumpulainen, K. (2012). Visioning the next generation of research on classroom interaction. In B. Kaur (Ed.), Graham Nuthall classroom research (pp. 302-308). Sense Publishers.
Kumpulainen, K., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Cesar, M. (Eds.). (2009). Investigating classroom interaction. Theories in action. Sense Publishers.
Kumpulainen, K., & Kajamaa, A. (2020). Sociomaterial movements of students’ engagement in a school’s makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 1292-1307 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12932
Kumpulainen, K., Kajamaa, A., & Rajala, A. (2018). Understanding educational change: Agency-structure dynamics in a novel design and making environment. Digital Education Review, 33, 26-38.
Kumpulainen, K., Kajamaa, A., & Rajala, A. (2019). Motive-demand dynamics creating a social context for students’ learning experiences in a making and design environment. In A. Edwards, M. Fleer, & L. Bottcher (Eds.), Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development: Societal, institutional and personal perspectives (pp. 185-199). Springer.
Kumpulainen, K., Rajala, A., & Kajamaa, A. (2019). Researching the materiality of communication in an educational makerspace: The meaning of social objects. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 439-453). Routledge
Kumpulainen, K., & Wray, D. (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning. Routledge.
Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
Mäkitalo, Å. (2011). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 59-78.
Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). Routledge.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In Raessens J., Goldstein, J. (Eds.). Handbook of Computer Game Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press
Stevens, R., Jona, K., Penney, L., Champion, D., Ramey, K., Hilppö, J., … Penuel, W. (2016). FUSE: An alternative infrastructure for empowering learners in schools. In C-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1025-1032). https://www.isls.org/icls/2016/docs/ICLS2016_Volume_2.pdf
Stevens, R., & Jona, K. (2017). Program design. FUSE studio website. https://www.fusestudio.net/program-design
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction. Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton, P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: analysing productive interaction (pp. 144-161). Routledge
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53-64.
Taylor, R. (2014). Meaning between, in, and around words, gestures and postures: Multimodal meaning making in children’s classroom communication. Language and Education, 28(5), 401-420.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The instrumental method in psychology. In R. Reiber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3). Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 85-89). Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. Van Der Veer, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader. Blackwell Publishers.
Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representations and the scientific understanding. Reidel.
Wegerif, R. (2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 6(3), 179-190.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715-750. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1074&context=gse_pubs
Yrjönsuuri, V., Kangas, K., Hakkarainen, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2019). The roles of material prototyping in collaborative design process at an elementary school. Design and Technology Education: An international Journal, 24(2). https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2585/2803
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their thanks to Jenny Renlund and Jenny Byman for their assistance in data analysis. The research reported in this chapter was funded by the Academy of Finland Learning by Making: The educational potential of school-based makerspaces for young learners’ digital competencies (iMake) project (no: 310790).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumpulainen, K., Kajamaa, A. (2021). Makerspaces as Tertiary Artifacts? The Meaning of Material Artifacts in Students’ Social Interaction During Technology-Rich Creative Learning. In: Muller Mirza, N., Dos Santos Mamed, M. (eds) Dialogical Approaches and Tensions in Learning and Development . Social Interaction in Learning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84226-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84226-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84225-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84226-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)