Skip to main content

Abstract

Every definition of left- and right-wing extremism should in essence have two components: one that describes the necessary preconditions to be regarded as extremist, and another one that classifies it as either left or right. In this chapter I will pursue three goals: first, I separate the concept of political extremism from the two main competing notions in the literature, i.e. populism and radicalism. Secondly, I define political extremism in general. And thirdly, I lay out what defines and characterizes the extreme left and right. In general, there is a broad consensus about what right-wing extremism is, whereas left-wing extremism is much more difficult to define. Furthermore, the concept itself is split into two parts, i.e. Marxism and anarchism, which can overlap but also be mutually exclusive. It is therefore reasonable to contest the use of an overarching term like left-wing extremism. Analytically, we should therefore speak of Marxist extremism or anarchist extremism to enhance the precision of the subject. Similar appeals should be made to the public debate, which often allocates the label “extremist" uncritical and prematurely to various groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a strong debate about whether populism can not only be a threat but also a corrective for democracy (Müller, 2016; Rovira Kaltwasser, 2012).

  2. 2.

    In fact, communist and fascist ideologies are not populist but rather elitist (Mudde & Rovira Kaltwasser, 2017).

  3. 3.

    The German interpretation is strongly based on the official definition of the Verfassungsschutzbericht (annual reports of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution) which uses a similar distinction.

  4. 4.

    This faces severe criticism today. Many authors argue that it has to be at least a two-dimensional space, e.g. egalitarian vs. anti-egalitarian (equality) and anarchic vs. illiberal (liberty) (Bobbio, 1996), authoritarian vs. libertarian and redistribution vs. market allocation (Kitschelt & McGann, 1995), or integration vs. demarcation on a cultural and an economic dimension (Kriesi et al., 2008). On the individual level there is also sharp critique that citizens differ in their understanding of notions like “left” and “right” (see e.g. Bauer et al., 2017; Jungkunz, 2019). I will elaborate on this further in Chapter 5.

  5. 5.

    Lipset’s original claim that fascism is based on the extremism of the middle class has been criticized recently. The second and third waves of right-wing extremism have seen a more diverse electorate of right-wing extremist parties among various classes of society (Mudde, 2000).

  6. 6.

    For instance, Midlarsky (2011, p. 7) considers political extremism as “the will to power by a social movement in the service of a political program typically at variance with that supported by existing state authorities, and for which individual liberties are to be curtailed in the name of collective goals, including the mass murder of those who would actually or potentially disagree with that program. Restrictions on individual freedom in the interests of the collectivity and the willingness to kill massively are central to this definition.” It is obvious that this definition gets far too close to what most people would call terrorism.

  7. 7.

    Since anti-democracy and anti-pluralism are regarded as necessary elements of any extremist force and I have discussed them already above, I refrain from going into further detail in this chapter.

  8. 8.

    This list could be extended even further. For instance, the above mentioned characteristics could again crystallize in anti-Americanism or anti-communism, corporatist notions in politics and the economy and cultural pessimism (Zimmermann & Saalfeld, 1993).

  9. 9.

    The term is also heavily debated (see Butterwegge, 2010). The next chapter returns to that perspective and draws conclusions.

  10. 10.

    In fact, Marx never presented a systematic theory of his ideas and the last chapter of Das Kapital remains unfinished (Dahrendorf, 1959).

  11. 11.

    In fact, in some eyes his ideas are seen as “fountainhead of a minor tradition of destructive and violent anarchism which prefers the gun to reason, coercion to persuasion” (Marshall, 2008, p. 306).

  12. 12.

    Even though he initially welcomed the revolution of 1917, he was a sharp critic of Lenin’s implementation. Of the “dictatorial tendencies” of the Bolshevik government, he writes prophetically, we “are learning in Russia how not to introduce communism" (Kropotkin, 1970, pp. 253–254) and “the very word ‘socialism’ will become a curse, as happened in France with the idea of equality for forty years after the rule of the Jacobins” (Kropotkin, 1973, p. 148).

  13. 13.

    Some scholars go even further and consider right-wing extremism as inherently anti-democratic, but socialism not necessarily. They argue that right-wing extremist characteristics like racism, xenophobia, or nationalism inevitably go against the tenets of liberal democracy, whereas facets of left-wing extremism like anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism, or anti-fascism do not (see Butterwegge, 2010; Neugebauer, 2000).

  14. 14.

    For instance, Wilhelm Heitmeyer (2018) uses the term “authoritarian-nationalist radicalism” (autoritärer Nationalradikalismus) to describe a form of right-wing extremism that is located between conservative right-wing populism and violent right-wing extremism.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, K. (2019). Conceptual confusion is not always a bad thing—The curious case of European radical right studies. In K. Marker, A. Schmitt, & J. Sirsch (Eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung (pp. 23–40). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, K., & Falter, J. W. (2002). Die Pathologie des Normalen. Eine Anwendung des Scheuch-Klingemann-Modells zur Erklärung rechtsextremen Denkens und Verhaltens. In D. Fuchs, E. Roller, & B. Weßels (Eds.), Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West (pp. 85–107). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes, U. (1989). Politischer Extremismus in demokratischen Verfassungsstaaten: Elemente einer normativen Rahmentheorie. Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes, U. (2007). Meaning and forms of political extremism in past and present. Central European Political Studies Review, 4(4), 242–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakunin, M. (2005). Statism and anarchy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, R. (1989). Social Darwinism: Science and myth in Anglo-American social thought. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (1981). The new racism: Conservatives and the ideology of the tribe. Junction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K., & Venetz, A. (2017). Is the Left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? Political Behavior, 39(3), 553–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (2002). Introduction. In P. L. Berger & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Many globalizations (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right: The significance of a political distinction. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J. (2004). Moving targets: Rethinking anarchist strategies. In J. Purkis & J. Bowen (Eds.), Changing anarchism (pp. 117–128). Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterwegge, C. (2010). Extremismus-, Totalitarismus- und Populismustheorien: Ideologien zur Diskreditierung der Linken: Eine Grundsatzkritik an ihren analytischen Defiziten, verborgenen Interessen und politischen Implikationen. In A. Pfahl-Traughber (Ed.), Jahrbuch für Extremismus- und Terrorismusforschung 2009/2010 (pp. 33–60). Fachhochschule des Bundes für Öffentliche Verwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. (1971). The political theory of anarchism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Littvay, L. (2019). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1970). Introduction. In D. Guerin (Ed.), Anarchism (pp. vii–xx). Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1979). The Washington connection and third world fascism. Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, A. J. (1997). The ethics of war. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuninghame, P. (2010). Autonomism as a global social movement. Working USA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 13(4), 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in Industrial society. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, O. (1996). Nation und Nationalismus in Deutschland: 1770–1990 (3rd ed.). Beck: C.H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, O., & Brähler, E. (Eds.). (2018). Flucht ins Autoritäre: Rechtsextreme Dynamiken in der Mitte der Gesellschaft. Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, S. L., & Mudde, C. (2005). Political extremism in Europe. European Political Science, 4(4), 476–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (1999). Protest, protesters, and protest policing: Public discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & T. Charles (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 66–96). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Fillieule, O. (2004). Policing social protest. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 217–241). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgoff, S. (1972). Bakunin on anarchy: Selected works by the activist-founder of world anarchism. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, R. (2004). Contesting capitalism?: Left parties and European integration. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis-Deri, F. (2010). The Black Blocs ten years after Seattle: Anarchism, direct action, and deliberative practices. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 4(2), 45–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, W., & Newcombe, A. G. (1969). Militarism, personality, and other social attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(2), 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower, D. D. (1961). Farewell address. January 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1986). An introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2002). The domestic sources of European anti-Americanism. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2004). Layers of anti-Americanism: Americanization, American unilateralism and anti-Americanism in a European perspective. European Journal of American Culture, 23(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feustel, R. (2011). Entropie des Politischen. In Forum für kritische Rechtsextremismusforschung (Ed.), Ordnung. Macht. Extremismus (pp. 117-139). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geronimo, Katsiaficas, G., & Kuhn, G. (2012). Fire and flames: A History of the German autonomist movement. PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. (2002). Sacrificial lambs dressed in wolves’ clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and the scapegoating of Jews. In L. S. Newman & R. Erber (Eds.), Understanding genocide (pp. 113–142). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Morales, L., & Ramiro, L. (2016). Varieties of radicalism: Examining the diversity of radical left parties and voters in Western Europe. West European Politics, 39(2), 351–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft (Vol. 2). Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. (2004). Rechts- und Linkspopulismus: Eine Fallstudie anhand von Schill-Partei und PDS. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2019). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. A., Riding, S., & Mudde, C. (2012). Measuring populist attitudes. Political concepts committee on concepts and methods Working Paper Series, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. A., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Andreadis, I. (2018). The activation of populist attitudes. Government and Opposition, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, W. (2018). Autoritäre Versuchungen: Signaturen der Bedrohungen I. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlouek, V., & Kopeek, L. (2010). Origin, ideology and transformation of political parties: East-Central and Western Europe compared. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, C. C. (2009). Old wine and old bottles: Anti-Americanism in Britain, France and Germany. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 7(2), 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution. Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamin, J. (2013). Two different realities: Notes on populism and the extreme right. In A. Mammone, E. Godin, & B. Jenkins (Eds.), Varieties of right-wing extremism in Europe (pp. 38–52). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaschke, H.-G. (1991). Streitbare Demokratie und Innere Sicherheit: Grundlagen, Praxis und Kritik. Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungkunz, S. (2019). Towards a measurement of extreme left-wing attitudes. German Politics, 28(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kailitz, S. (2004). Politischer Extremismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine Einführung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsiaficas, G. (2006). The subversion of politics: European autonomous social movements and the decolonization of everyday life. AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, D., & March, L. (2016). Introduction. In L. March & D. Keith (Eds.), Europe’s radical left (pp. 1–23). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiess, J., & Decker, O. (2010). Der Rechtsextremismusbegriff — Einführung und Problemanzeige. In O. Decker, M.Weißmann, J. Kiess, & E. Brähler (Eds.), Die Mitte in der Krise (pp. 10-20). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. J. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). Commitment and extremism: A goal systemic analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappertsbusch, F. (2016). Antiamerikanismus in Deutschland: Über die Funktion von Amerikabildern in nationalistischer und ethnozentrischer Rhetorik. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, K. (1991). Back to Sarajevo or beyond Trianon? Some thoughts on the problem of nationalism in Eastern Europe. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 27(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). Globalization and its impact on national spaces of competition. In H. Kriesi, E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, & T. Frey (Eds.), West European politics in the age of gobalization (pp. 3–22). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. McClure Phillips & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1906). The conquest of bread. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1969). The state: Its historic role. Freedom Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1970). The Russian revolution and the Soviet Government: Letter to the workers of Western Europe. In R. N. Baldwin (Ed.), Kropotkin’s revolutionary pamphlets (pp. 252–259). Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1973). Two letters to Lenin. In P. Avrich (Ed.), The anarchists in the Russian revolution (pp. 146–149). Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1995). The conquest of bread and other writings. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Social stratification and “Right-Wing extremism.” British Journal of Sociology, 10(4), 346–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The Social bases of politics. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1971). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790–1970. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L., & Rommerskirchen, C. (2015). Out of left field? Explaining the variable electoral success of European radical left parties. Party Politics, 21(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, M. (2008). Environmental radicalism and extremism in postcommunist Europe. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 2(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P. (2008). Demanding the impossible: A History of anarchism. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1883). Das Kapital. Otto Meissner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy. Charles H. Kerr & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1998). The German ideology. Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maximoff, G. P. (1964). The political philosophy of Bakunin: Scientific anarchism. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlarsky, M. I. (2011). Origins of political extremism: Mass violence in the twentieth century and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (1995). Right-wing extremism analyzed: A comparative analysis of the ideologies of three alleged right-wing extremist parties (NPD, NDP, CP’86). European Journal of Political Research, 27(2), 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (1996). The war of words defining the extreme right party family. West European Politics, 19(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2000). The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(3), 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2010). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2018). The far right in America. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacos, B. L., Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2011). Selling fear: Counterterrorism, the media, and public opinion. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattke, M., & Göpner, F. (2013). Uneindeutige Definitionen. Eine Begriffsverwirrung. In Kulturbüro Sachsen e.V. (Ed.), (Dia)Logbuch Sachsen (pp. 19–31). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, G. (2000). Extremismus — Rechtsextremismus — Linksextremismus: Einige Anmerkungen zu Begriffen, Forschungskonzepten, Forschungsfragen und Forschungsergebnissen. In W. Schubarth & R. Stöss (Eds.), Rechtsextremismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 13–37). Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, G. (2010). “Der Facher des Bösen — Was wir mit Extremismus alles zu meinen meinen”. Eine kurze Befassung mit Begriffen und Thesen. In Kulturbüro Sachsen e.V., Weiterdenken - Heinrich Böll Stiftung Sachsen e.V., Forum für kritische Rechtsextremismusforschung, & Studierendenrat der TU Dresden (Eds.), Gibt es Extremismus? Extremismusansatz und Extremismusbegriff in der Auseinandersetzung mit Neonazismus und (anti-)demokratischen Einstellungen (pp. 13–18). Heinrich Böll Stiftung Sachsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkrumah, K. (1966). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfahl-Traughber, A. (2010a). Gemeinsamkeiten im Denken der Feinde einer offenen Gesellschaft: Strukturmerkmale extremistischer Ideologien. In A. Pfahl-Traughber (Ed.), Jahrbuch für Extremismus- und Terrorismusforschung 2009/2010 (pp. 9–32). Fachhochschule des Bundes für Öffentliche Verwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfahl-Traughber, A. (2010b). Kritik der Kritik der Extremismustheorie- und Totalitarismustheorie: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit den Einwanden von Christoph Butterwegge. In A. Pfahl-Traughber (Ed.), Jahrbuch für Extremismus- und Terrorismusforschung 2009/2010 (pp. 61–86). Fachhochschule des Bundes für Öffentliche Verwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfahl-Traughber, A. (2014). Linksextremismus in Deutschland. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. (1875). La Pornocratie Ou Les Femmes Dans Les Temps Modernes. A. Lacroix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. (1876). What is property? Benjamin R. Tucker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiro, L. (2016). Support for radical left parties in Western Europe: Social background, ideology and political orientations. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. (2017). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 20, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuch, E., & Klingemann, H.-D. (1967). Theorie des Rechtsradikalismus in westlichen Industriegesellschaften. In H.-D. Ortlieb & B. Molitor (Eds.), Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik (pp. 11–29). J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. M. (1998). Environmental terrorism: Analyzing the concept. Journal of Peace Research, 35(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M., & Grobman, A. (2009). Denying history: Who says the Holocaust never happened and why do they say it? University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirner, M. (1845). Der Einzige und sein Eigenthum. Otto Wigand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirner, M. (1913). The ego and his own. A.C. Fifield, E.C. Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöss, R. (2007). Rechtsextremismus im Wandel (2nd ed.). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turse, N. (2008). The complex: How the military invades our everyday lives. Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P. (1967). Race and racism: A comparative perspective. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M., Lubbers, M., Kraaykamp, G., & Jaspers, E. (2014). Support for radical left ideologies in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westle, B., & Niedermayer, O. (1992). Contemporary right-wing extremism in West Germany: “The Republicans” and their electorate. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, J. (2004). The marriage of Marx and Freud: Critical theory and psychoanalysis. In F. Rush (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to critical theory (pp. 74–102). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (1997). Explaining xenophobia and racism: A critical review of current research approaches. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2002). Nationalist exclusion and ethnic conflict: Shadows of modernity. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G. (2004). Media and the path to peace. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettl, C. (2014). Die Wähler der Linkspartei.PDS von 1994 bis 2009. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E., & Saalfeld, T. (1993). The three waves of West German right-wing extremism. In P. H. Merkl & L. Weinberg (Eds.), Encounters with the contemporary radical right (pp. 50–74). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko, Y. P. (2014). Extremism from the perspective of a system approach. Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 7(1), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuquete, J. P. (2014). Men in Black: Dynamics, violence, and lone wolf potential. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Jungkunz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jungkunz, S. (2022). What Is Political Extremism?. In: The Nature and Origins of Political Extremism In Germany and Beyond. New Perspectives in German Political Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83336-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics