Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PNDL at the Crossroads Between Sociology, Public Management and Public Finance: Towards a Theoretical Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing PNDL

  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

This study is about public organisations acting in a complex funding environment. Therefore, we draw on concepts and explanatory models from sociology, public management and public finance. Similar to other social science disciplines, there is also diversity within public administration as a field of study. A recent work on this concludes that nowadays public administration is placed at a crossroads, facing serious challenges between its diverse shades as a ‘vertical’ department in the university hierarchy and a ‘horizontal’ field with various cross-cutting academic organisational structures and boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Organisational structure of the Ministry available at: https://www.mlpda.ro/uploads/articole/attachments/5ecbd73a4df0e817022890.pdf (date of access: June 16, 2020).

  2. 2.

    Further reference on the added value of sociology in the study of public organisations is available in Kelman (2007).

  3. 3.

    There are five levels of analysis included in the review. These are industrial/institutional, organisational, individual cross-level, and superordinate paradigm (Bansal & Gao, 2006, 467).

  4. 4.

    The relationship has been viewed as a contract between the voters as principal and the state (or municipality, county council, Parliament, etc.) as the agent.

  5. 5.

    Volume of the sample N=177 (Heinelt and Magnier, 2018, 162).

  6. 6.

    The key difference between type l (champions of decentralisation) is the small share of locally controlled taxes (Swianiewicz, 2014, 305). Further references on the characteristics of public administration in Romania in the European context in Thijs et al. (2018b).

References

  • Addison, H. (2009). Is administrative capacity a useful concept? Review of the application, meaning and observation of administrative capacity in political science literature. London School of Economics and Political Science [Online]. Retrieved August 10, 2012 from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/addisonh/Papers/AC_Concept.pdf

  • Ahmad, E., & Martinez, L. (2004). On the design and effectiveness of targeted expenditure programs. IMF Working Paper No. 04/220. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. (2010). Capacity, leadership and organizational performance: Testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, G., & Van de Ven, A. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the future by looking to the past. Examining research published on organizations and environment. Organization& Environment, 19(4), 456–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezes, P. (2020). Seeing public bureaucracies like a sociologist: (A plea towards) reconnecting sociology and public administration. In J. Bouckaert (Ed.), European perspectives for public administration: The way forward (pp. 163–185). Retrieved August 10, 2012 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvv417th.13

  • Brugha, R., & Varvaszovski, Z. (2020). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning. Oxford University Press, 15(3), 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Da̧browski, M. M. (2010). Europeanisation of Polish regions: Impact of the European Union’s structural funds on sub-national institutions and regional development policy practice. Ph.D. Thesis. University of the West of Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveria, B. C., & Filho Fontes, R. J. (2017). Agency problems in the public sector: the role of mediators between central administration of city hall and executive bodies. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 51(4), 596–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B. (2011). Local governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 313–330). Retrieved February 7, 2019 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964

  • Doroftei, M., & Dimulescu, V. (2015). Corruption risks in the Romanian infrastructure sector. In A. Mungiu-Pippidi (Ed.), Government favouritism in Europe. The anticorruption report (vol. 3, pp. 19–34). Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Cayeros, A., & Magaloni, B. (2003). The politics of public spending. Part I – The logic of vote buying. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/183571468758744201/pdf/269490v110Caye1s1of1public1spending.pdf

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160, (14 pages). Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101?read-now=1&seq=10\#page_scan_tab_contents

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas, M. (2014). Prometheus unbound: Quality of government and institutionalized grand corruption in public procurement, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, R. C. (2006). Stakeholder management in the local government decision-making area: Evidences from a triangulation study with the english local government. Brazilian Administration Review, 3(1), 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães dos Santos, L. P. (2015). Comparing the use of forward-looking and contemporary performance measurement to formulate incentive contracts in the presence of the horizon problem: An experimental analysis. Universidade Federal da Bahia, Faculdade de Ciências Contábeis, Salvador, BA, Brazil. Retrieved February 4, 2019 from https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rcf/v26n68/1519-7077-rcf-201501060.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., & Magnier, A. (2018). Analyzing governance through local leaders’ perceptions: Comparative surveys, academic networks and main results. Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica, 46, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., Magnier, A., Cabria, M., & Reynaert, H. (Eds.) (2018). Political leaders and changing local democracy the European mayor. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variation on a theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Y., Moynihan, D., & Ingraham, P. W. (2003). Capacity, management and performance: Exploring the links. American Review of Public Administration, 33(3), 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O. (2003). The traditional model of public administration and public management. In Public management and administration. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustedt, T., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2020). Public administration and disciplines. In G. Bouckaert & W. Jann European perspectives for public administration: The way forward. Leuven University Press. Project MUSE. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.72918

  • Kelman, S. (2007). Public administration and organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 225–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2018). Decentralization and governance in Europe: Evidence from different expenditure components, EN - Governance and Economics research Network. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from http://infogen.webs.uvigo.es/WP/WP1802.pdf

  • Lane, P. J., Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. H. (1998). Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud and Lev reconsidered. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.-E. (2013). The principal-agent approach to politics: Policy implementation and public policy-making.Open Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leruth, L., & Paul, E. (2006). A principal-agent theory approach to public expenditure management systems in developing countries. IMF Working Paper, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., & Orton, J. D. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems.Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, R. (1999). Resource dependency: The emergence of order. In R. Marion (Ed.), The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of former social systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, M. (2016). City halls and competition for European funds: The case of “white spots”. (Primăriile şi competiţia fondurilor europene: Cazul “punctelor albe”). Sociologie Românească, 14(02–03), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L., Jr., & Meier, K. (2010). In defense of bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 12(3), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar Dominguez, J. (2010). The political determinants of resource allocation in Mexican municipalities. The fund for municipal social infrastructure. Ph.D. Thesis. Institute of Development Studies. Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutions and organizations (instituţii şi organizaţii). Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M., & Dean, J. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17(4), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. W., & Bertozzi, M. (1988). Principals and agents: An explanatory model for public budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 10(3), 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.807807. Retrieved May 2, 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263249742_An_Empirical_Typology_of_Local_Government_Systems_in_Eastern_Europe

  • Thijs, N., Hammerschmid, G., & Palaric, E. (2018b). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU 28. Retrieved February 3, 2020 from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e89d981-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

  • Vesely, A. (2013). Accountability in central and Eastern Europe: Concept and reality. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 310 – 330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

    Anca Monica Marin

Authors
  1. Anca Monica Marin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Monica Marin, A. (2021). PNDL at the Crossroads Between Sociology, Public Management and Public Finance: Towards a Theoretical Approach. In: Assessing PNDL. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82844-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation