Abstract
A key challenge in making a transparent formalization of a legal text is the dependency on two domain experts. While a legal expert is needed in order to interpret the legal text, a logician or a programmer is needed for encoding it into a program or a formula. Various existing methods are trying to solve this challenge by improving or automating the communication between the two experts. In this paper, we follow a different direction and attempt to eliminate the dependency on the target domain expert. This is achieved by inverting the translation back into the original text. By skipping over the logical translation, a legal expert can now both interpret and evaluate a translation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Please refer to [5] for more information and examples.
References
Bajwa, I.S., Lee, M.G., Bordbar, B.: SBVR business rules generation from natural language specification. In: 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Citeseer (2011)
Bartolini, C., Lenzini, G., Santos, C.: An agile approach to validate a formal representation of the GDPR. In: Kojima, K., Sakamoto, M., Mineshima, K., Satoh, K. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11717, pp. 160–176. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31605-1_13
Governatori, G., Shek, S.: Regorous: a business process compliance checker. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 245–246 (2013)
Johnsen, Å., Berre, A.: A bridge between legislator and technologist-formalization in SBVR for improved quality and understanding of legal rules. In: International Workshop on Business Models, Business Rules and Ontologies, Bressanone, Brixen, Italy. Citeseer (2010)
Libal, T.: A meta-level annotation language for legal texts. In: Dastani, M., Dong, H., van der Torre, L. (eds.) CLAR 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12061, pp. 131–150. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_9
Libal, T.: Towards automated GDPR compliance checking. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Scientific Foundations of Trustworthy AI, Integrating Learning, Optimisation and Reasoning (to appear)
Libal, T., Pascucci, M.: Automated reasoning in normative detachment structures with ideal conditions. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 63–72 (2019)
Libal, T., Steen, A.: NAI: the normative reasoner. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 262–263 (2019)
Libal, T., Steen, A.: Towards an executable methodology for the formalization of legal texts. In: Dastani, M., Dong, H., van der Torre, L. (eds.) CLAR 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12061, pp. 151–165. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_10
Zeiler, M.D., Fergus, R.: Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8689, pp. 818–833. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53
Prakken, H., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K.: A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. J. Logic Comput. 25(5), 1141–1166 (2015)
Robaldo, L., Bartolini, C., Palmirani, M., Rossi, A., Martoni, M., Lenzini, G.: Formalizing GDPR provisions in reified I/O logic: the DAPRECO knowledge base. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 29(4), 401–449 (2020)
Routen, T., Bench-Capon, T.: Hierarchical formalizations. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 35(1), 69–93 (1991)
Sergot, M.J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P., Cory, H.T.: The British nationality act as a logic program. Commun. ACM 29(5), 370–386 (1986)
Vitali, F., Zeni, F.: Towards a country-independent data format: the Akoma Ntoso experience. In: Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, pp. 67–86 (2007)
Acknowledgment
Tereza Novotn acknowledges the support of the ERDF project “Internal grant agency of Masaryk University” (No. \(\mathtt {CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19 \backslash \_ \backslash 0073/0016943}\)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Libal, T., Novotná, T. (2021). Towards Transparent Legal Formalization. In: Calvaresi, D., Najjar, A., Winikoff, M., Främling, K. (eds) Explainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems. EXTRAAMAS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12688. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82016-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82017-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)