Abstract
This article is devoted to improving the motivation of students to study and, in general, the quality of education in the context of global digitalization. Along with numerous existing methods, the internal component of thinking and perception as an integral part of it plays a significant role. Research has shown that the mathematical logic used in the creation of most algorithms is not identical to the logic of thinking. The combined fuzzy and genetic logic that guides the student only partially includes clear logical structures. Moreover, this inclusion is manifested in different students with different degrees of belonging. If the teacher understands and uses the degree of such inclusion, then students will be able to show results of education that seem to exceed their own capabilities. Examples of the implementation of matrix thinking with students of military accounting, technical and creative specialties, as one of the ways to digitalize knowledge, are given. An example of the implementation of digitalization of training with students of applied programmers is considered on the example of creating software based on the material passed in a related IT discipline.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blaisdell AP (2017) Cognitive dimension of operant learning/learning and memory: a comprehensive reference, 2nd edn, pp 85–110
Tsuchiya N, Andrillon T, Haun A (2020) A reply to “the unfolding argument”: beyond functionalism behaviorism and towards a science of causal structure theories of consciousness. Conscious Cogn 79:102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102877
Manolescu M (2013) School competence between behaviourism and cognitivism or the cognitive approach to schooling. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 76:912–916
Wölfling KJ, Müller KW, Beutel ME (2012) AS32-02—treating internet addiction: first results on efficacy of a standardized cognitive-behavioral therapeutic approach. Eur Psychiatry 27:1
Kesim M, Altınpulluk H (2015) A theoretical analysis of MOOCs types from a perspective of learning theories. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 186:15–19
Wu W-H, Chiou W-B, Kao H-Y et al (2012) Re-exploring game-assisted learning research: the perspective of learning theoretical bases. Comput Educ 59(4):1153–1161
Fatemi Aqda M, Hamidi F, Ghorbandordinejad F (2011) The impact of constructivist and cognitive distance instructional design on the learner’s creativity. Procedia Comput Sci 3:260–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.044
Iqbal HM (2015) Cognitive development, educational theories of international encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, pp 51–57
Kurt S (2011) Use of constructivist approach in architectural education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 15:3980–3988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.402
Pinevich E, Safaryan O (2020) Methods for improving the educational potential of students. In: E3S Web of conferences, vol 210, 18034
(2020) Learning of students? Internet High Educ 45:165–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.402
Duane BT, Satre ME (2014) Utilizing constructivism learning theory in collaborative testing as a creative strategy to promote essential nursing skills. Nurse Educ Today 34(1):31–34
Loureiro A, Bettencourt T (2014) The use of virtual environments as an extended classroom—a case study with adult learners in tertiary education. Procedia Technol 13:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.013
Gallagher JR (2020) The ethics of writing for algorithmic audiences. Future Gener Comput Syst
Klement M, Chráska M, Klementová S (2015) Explanation of instruments and procedures used by the recipients of education in order to build their own learning network, based on the generic model cognitive process. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 12(174):1614–1622
Gueya C-C, Chengb Y-Y, Shibatac S (2010) A triarchal instruction model: integration of principles from behaviorism, cognitivism, and humanism. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 9:105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pinevich, E., Mekhantseva, K., Volokhov, A., Gargatsova, S. (2022). Matrix Thinking in the Fractal Digitalization of Education. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M. (eds) XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80945-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80946-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)