Skip to main content

Students Who Stand Out: Faculty Perspectives on the Competencies that Define Outstanding Students Entering the Workforce

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 266))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The future of work will be defined by increased connectivity between technology and people. The engineering workforce is situated at this intersection and needs a broad and ever-evolving system of competencies to address socio-technical issues. Although engineering practice continues to adapt at the human-technology frontier, education has been slower to respond. As a result, there is a purported competency gap between academia and industry. Within engineering education, faculty members play a critical role in the academic preparation and professional formation of students. Thus, it is instructive to consider faculty members’ perspectives on the competencies that define a student’s ability to succeed in the workplace. This study employed a qualitative approach through interviews with 11 engineering faculty members to characterize these perspectives. The findings indicate that faculty members emphasize students’ intra- and interpersonal competencies and their involvement in competency-building activities outside of the classroom. This paper concludes by leveraging the findings into a broader discussion of competencies needed for the future of work and equity and access related to competency-building activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019–2020 | ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/. Accessed 29 Jan 2021

  2. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. https://nae.edu/25876/The-Engineer-of-2020-Visions-of-Engineering-in-the-New-Century. Accessed 29 Jan 2021

  3. Rottmann, C., Reeve, D.W., Sacks, R., Klassen, M.: An intersubjective analysis of engineering leadership across organizational locations: implications for higher education. Can. J. High.Educ. 46, 146–173 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simmons, D.R., McCall, C., Clegorne, N.A.: Leadership competencies for construction professionals as identified by construction industry executives. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 146, 04020109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farr, J., Brazil, D.: Leadership skills development for engineers. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 38, 110–118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2010.5645763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodale, M.J.: The right stuff: traits and skills of effective leaders. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 5(1), 7–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 25 Years of the Washington Accord, IEA. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf

  8. Accreditation Criteria Procedures, Engineers Canada. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/accreditation-criteria-procedures-2016-final.pdf

  9. Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes third edition (1).pdf. https://www.engc.org.uk/engcdocuments/internet/Website/Accreditation%20of%20Higher%20Education%20Programmes%20third%20edition%20(1).pdf.

  10. An Industry Perspective on STEM Education for the Future: ISSIP-NSF Workshop. The International Society of Service Innovation Professionals (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Male, S.A., Bush, M.B., Chapman, E.S.: Perceptions of competency deficiencies in engineering graduates. Australas. J. Eng. Educ. 16, 55–68 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2010.11464039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nair, C.S., Patil, A., Mertova, P.: Re-engineering graduate skills – a case study. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 34, 131–139 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902829281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Birks, M., Chapman, Y., Francis, K.: Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. J. Res. Nurs. 13, 68–75 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L.: Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 39, 124–130 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bancino, R., Zevalkink, C.: Soft skills: the new curriculum for hard-core technical professionals. Tech. Connect. Educ. Careers J1(82), 20–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf

  17. Polmear, M., Simmons, D.R., Clegorne, N.A.: Undergraduate civil engineering students’ perspectives on skills for future success. In: 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274269

  18. Newberry, B.: The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Sci. Eng. Ethics 10, 343–351 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burt, B., et al.: Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences. In: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, pp. 22.1132.1–22.1132.11. ASEE Conferences, Vancouver, BC (2011). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18498

  20. Polmear, M., Chau, A.D., Simmons, D.R.: Intersection of diversity, out-of-class engagement, and engineer of 2020 outcomes for civil engineering students. J. Eng. Manag. 37, 04021019 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan, R., Shehab, R.L., Trytten, D.A., Foor, C.E., Walden, S.E.: Barriers to broadening participation in engineering competition teams. Presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. IFTF: The Next Era of Human | Machine Partnerships. https://www.iftf.org/humanmachinepartnerships/. Accessed 29 Jan 2021

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for supporting this work under grant number [1463802 and 1931371]. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeline Polmear .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Polmear, M., Simmons, D.R., Volpe, E., Weisenfeld, D. (2021). Students Who Stand Out: Faculty Perspectives on the Competencies that Define Outstanding Students Entering the Workforce. In: Leitner, C., Ganz, W., Satterfield, D., Bassano, C. (eds) Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 266. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80840-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80840-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80839-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80840-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics