Abstract
With the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 virus in early 2020, shortages of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) masks became a critical problem. European governments recommended that civilians should not use these masks so that the shortages in the hospitals would be minimised. In Europe, civilians were instead advised to wear community face coverings. In June 2020, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) published CWA 17553:2020 [1,2,3] which formalised minimum requirements, methods of testing and use of community face coverings. The CWA 17553 is presently only a recommendation, and not an official standard such as the EN14683 standard for surgical masks or the EN149 standard for filtering facepiece respirators. Because there are different performance requirements for these three different classes of masks, it makes comparing their performance challenging. In this work, we perform particulate filtration efficiency measurement, total inward leakage measurement and breathability measurement on a range of surgical masks, filtering facepiece respirators and community face coverings. This analysis provides a useful comparison between material performance and the effectiveness of a mask’s design which is manufactured from this material.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergman, M.S., et al.: Development of an advanced respirator fit-test headform. J. Occup. Environ. Hygiene 11(2), 117–125 (2014)
CEN, E.: 149: 2001 norm: Respiratory protective devices-Filtering half masks to protect against particles-Requirements, testing, marking. European Committee for Standardization (2009)
CEN: EN14683:2019+AC Medical face masks - Requirements and test methods. European Committee for Standardization (2019)
CEN: CWA 17553: Community face coverings - Guide to minimum requirements, methods of testing and use. European Committee for Standardization (2020)
CEN: European Standards (2021). https://www.cen.eu/work/products/ens/pages/default.aspx. Accessed 15 Jan 2021
FOD: Coronavirus: niet-conforme mondmaskers – Alternative Test Protocol (ATP) (2021). https://www.fagg.be/nl/news/coronavirus_alternative_test_protocol_atp_voor_chirurgische_mondmaskers. Accessed 15 Jan 2021
Lee, K., Slavcev, A., Nicas, M.: Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators. J. Occup. Environ. Hygiene 1(1), 22–28 (2004)
PALAS: Mas-Q-Check (2021). https://www.palas.de/en/product/mas-q-check, from https://www.palas.de/en/product/mas-q-check. Accessed 15 Jan 2021
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Industrial Research Fund (IOF) of the University of Antwerp, grant number FFI200119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyên, N.N., Van Loon, J., Du Bois, E., Verlinden, J., Verwulgen, S., Watts, R. (2021). Experimental Comparison of CWA 17553:2020 Community Face Coverings to Surgical Masks and Filtering Facepiece Respirators. In: Arezes, P.M., Boring, R.L. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80288-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80288-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80287-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80288-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)