Skip to main content

Technical Rhythms and Harmonies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reprising Craftsmanship

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter looks into an expressive perspective of technique. It starts by discussing some pertinent issues to frame the overall discussion. The notion of reprise developed in previous chapters will be extended into the realm of technique, connecting rhythm and effective action in eurhythmy, a feature of technical activity’s life cycles. In their expressive dimension, musical instruments are impregnated—in their making, sounding, and even presence—with mythical and practical values. Additionally, more or less intangible (in music) and more or less tangible (in luthiery) form-giving processes are constantly actualized by reprise dynamics. This will help specifying how technical (e)motions are linked to expressivity. Since the value of a technical form giving cannot be fully foreseen by people behind it when these (e)motions (and objects) are produced, the eurhythmy that characterizes skilful action refuses to be limited to one particular sphere of valuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Febvre (1935, p. 531, “Technique: un de ces nombreux mots don’t l’histoire n’est pas faite”, my translation).

  2. 2.

    Proposals by Simondon (2012, 2014), Sigaut (2006), Ingold (2000, 2001) feature major criticisms to this disjunction.

  3. 3.

    Arendt (1998, p. 152, added emphasis).

  4. 4.

    Pye (1968, p. 22).

  5. 5.

    Pye (ibid.).

  6. 6.

    Pye (ibid., pp. 22–23, added emphasis).

  7. 7.

    Todd (2004).

  8. 8.

    Ingold (2000, p. 433).

  9. 9.

    Ingold (ibid.).

  10. 10.

    The reader can get a global idea of the French tradition on technique/technology studies by consulting Loeve et al. (2018).

  11. 11.

    Feyerabend (2003).

  12. 12.

    For a wide range of literature on the subject, see Ruckmich (1913a). The notion of rhythm as an overarching aesthetic principle can be found in Fogerty (1937).

  13. 13.

    Bücher (1896), Mauss (1921), Krueger (1913), Baldwin (1891), Drozyński (1911), Ruckmich (1913b), Clark (1913), Marbe (1904), Niska (1821), Wölfflin (1886), Ghyka (1931, 1938), Buytendijk (1935), Aftalion (1913).

  14. 14.

    For a fuller account on the study of rhythm in the aforementioned broader sense, the reader may consult the vast resources available at https://rhuthmos.eu/.

  15. 15.

    Michon (2018a, b).

  16. 16.

    Michon (2018a, p. 38). The prevalence of the platonic use of rhythm had deep repercussions in the latter development of deeply rationalistic aesthetics, anthropology and psychology. As it will become apparent, this dynamic character of eurythmy will be central for the notion of technique that I seek to present here.

  17. 17.

    Michon (2018b, p. 90).

  18. 18.

    A point treated thoroughly by Merleau-Ponty (1964).

  19. 19.

    Michon (2018b, p. 95).

  20. 20.

    Pye (1968, Chap. 2).

  21. 21.

    Sigaut (2006, p. 133, my translation).

  22. 22.

    Leroi-Gourhan (1965, p. 35, my translation, added emphasis).

  23. 23.

    Mauss (2009).

  24. 24.

    Michon (2015, p. 92, my translation, added emphasis).

  25. 25.

    To sum up Sigaut’s diagnosis, which is nevertheless spread in a number of his works (1991, 1994, 2003/2006): “it is the old dichotomy between thought and action that […] seems unacceptable from the moment one inquires about technical action” (Sigaut, 2006, my translation). Now, Bourdieu’s notion of habitus (1997) leads us into an impasse. From the moment habitus is considered as “attained”, technical activity is no longer possible action and loses its protensive dimension (anticipatory, imaginative, and incomplete form). While Bourdieu’s question goes after what remains invisible when attained, our focus is on the processes wherein the attained gains this character, viz. how it became stable.

  26. 26.

    See also Ingold (2000, Chaps. 15 and 16, 2001). An encompassing response to this situation may be found in Ingold (2013).

  27. 27.

    Sigaut (1991, p. 33, my translation, added brackets).

  28. 28.

    Sigaut (1994).

  29. 29.

    cf. Ingold (2000, Chaps. 15 and 16).

  30. 30.

    Truslit, in Repp (1992, p. 276, added emphasis).

  31. 31.

    When referring to morphology from here onwards, I do so in Goethean terms; namely, as constant organic development that when approached fragmentarily can deaden our direct grasp of nature: “[I] f we look at all these Gestalten, especially the organic ones, we will discover that nothing in them is permanent, nothing is at rest or defined—everything is in a flux of continual motion” (Goethe, 1983, p. 63).

  32. 32.

    Pálsson (1994), Ingold (2000).

  33. 33.

    Ingold (2000, p. 291, added brackets).

  34. 34.

    These rhythmic regularities and irregularities appear more clearly in the processes I have addressed in Chap. 3 with the motifs of ‘the principle of dual control’, ‘the myth of the musical eternal return’, ‘to breathe is to keep music alive’, ‘I/me—Playing/ studying’, ‘virtuosity and musicality’, and ‘the mastery of the instrument is the mastery of oneself’.

  35. 35.

    In short, these are practices that seek to transform people that engage in them, which do not necessarily fall within the scope of institutionalized religion: “The philosophy teacher’s discourse could be presented in such a way that the disciple, as auditor, reader, or interlocutor, could make spiritual progress and transform himself within” (Hadot, 2002).

  36. 36.

    Smith (2002, p. 4).

  37. 37.

    Although nowadays music popularly serves as entertainment (even becoming a tool to avoid silence; i.e., elevator music), this has hardly been the case historically. Without necessarily taking any of its playfulness away, music has been inseparable from much of human knowledge (i.e., math, geometry, architecture, astronomy, etc.) and everyday life (i.e., rituals, ceremonies, feasts, work, etc.). Also see Godwin (1993), Merriam (1964).

  38. 38.

    Sudo (1998, p. 28).

  39. 39.

    When addressing myth, I am following the work of Leszek Kolakowski (1989), particularly concerning the relationship between myth and value.

  40. 40.

    Borthwick (1970).

  41. 41.

    Mopsik (1999), Tolkien (1977).

  42. 42.

    Loopuyt (2018, p. 23, my translation).

  43. 43.

    Loopuyt (2018, p. 102, my translation).

  44. 44.

    Yupanqui (2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siPWW-udzLM, my translation).

  45. 45.

    Not unlike moving creatures’ dorsiventrality, or the enantiomorphy manifest in minerals or chemical elements.

  46. 46.

    Buob (2013, p. 80, my translation).

  47. 47.

    Here, I am using ‘sympathetic’ in two ways. The first is that of ‘sympathetic resonance’, as it happens with strings (or any vibrating object) that are excited according to the frequency of others, despite not being attacked directly. The second is incorporated in Theodor Lipps’ (1923) notion of Einfühlung, where our engagement with things is in fundamental continuity with feeling. Lipps actually uses rhythm to illustrate this point in a way that reinforces the use of eurhythmy described above: “The reproductive force of rhythm is not directed upon the particular contents of […] former experiences, but upon the mode of psychical movement which is realised in them. The result is reproduction of a general condition of my being corresponding with the rhythm, the perception (Vorstellung) of a unifying or embracing (umfassend) ‘general mood’ (Gesammtstimmung) of freedom and necessity, of passionate pushing forwards or quiet moderation, or seriousness or cheerful play, etc.” (Lipps in Lee & Anstruther-Thomson, 1912).

  48. 48.

    Sanz (1976, p. 2: “Otros han tratado de la perfecciòn de este instrumento, diziendo algunos, que la guitarra es un instrumento perfecto, otros que no; yo voy por un medio, y digo, que ni es perfecta, ni imperfecta, sino como tu la hizieres, pues la falta, ò perfeccion està en quien la tañe, y no en ella”; my translation in the main text).

  49. 49.

    Covarrubias Orozco (1610, Centuria II, Emblema 31, my translation). Image retrieved from https://archive.org/details/emblemasmoralesd00covar/page/254/mode/2up.

  50. 50.

    Boesch (1993).

  51. 51.

    Boesch (1993, p. 13).

  52. 52.

    Ibid.

  53. 53.

    Boesch (1993, p. 8).

  54. 54.

    Matsuda (in Robinson, Ed., 2017, pp. 73–77).

  55. 55.

    Komlosy (2014), Arendt (1998, Chaps. 3 and 4).

  56. 56.

    Mills (2000, pp. 195–196).

  57. 57.

    Hopefully the costs of reducing the expressive array used in scientific practices makes us react and consider the consequences of the massive contemporary loss of languages along with their people.

  58. 58.

    Loopuyt (2018, pp. 41–42, my translation).

  59. 59.

    Loopuyt (2018, 108, my translation).

  60. 60.

    The interested reader may also consult Racy (2003).

  61. 61.

    For an in-depth argument on the restrictions imposed by the distinction between function and form in architecture as well as in other fields, see Spuybroek (2016). Here is a condensed account: “The idea of a vitalised geometry goes directly against Alberti’s notion of how to make structures beautiful. According to Leon Battista Alberti, pulchritudo and ornamentum come on top of structure. First you have the structure, then comes the process of beautifying it. In the Gothic, beauty is already in the figures, it precedes structure. Life is the urge for composition and the striving for configuration, which is remarkably close to Whitehead’s remark that beauty is the teleology of the universe. Therefore in the Gothic we cannot distinguish beauty from utility; beauty is a beauty that works. Things are active, they work, and while they do so they come together and produce structure. This means that structure, the becoming of things, is a result of beauty: things feel for each other and that brings them together” (Spuybroek, 2017, p. 150).

  62. 62.

    Buob (2013, p. 73, my translation).

  63. 63.

    Bellow (1970, p. 73. Open access image available at https://archive.org/details/illustratedhisto0000bell/page/72/mode/2up).

  64. 64.

    Bellow (1970, p. 74 Open access image available at https://archive.org/details/illustratedhisto0000bell/page/n109/mode/2up).

  65. 65.

    One might say that with this move the instrument slides into the genre of the vanitas, coming closer to reminding us of death and transience over the figures of life and the perennial I have been emphasizing.

  66. 66.

    Smith (2002, p. 11).

  67. 67.

    Simondon (2012, pp. 252–253, my translation).

  68. 68.

    A reticulated surface, as it can be seen in living organisms (often used in botanics or zoology to describe a rippled, irregular connective tissue) is characterized as a honeycomb-like structure. In gothic architecture, it has been used to describe the tracery constituted by various ribs that configure coalescing and divergent patterns, as the ones you might get when twisting a net (as one would squeeze a wet towel) that opens up towards its ends.

  69. 69.

    Ingold (2007, 2013, 2015).

  70. 70.

    Simondon’s distinction between closed and open objects can clarify what is meant by indetermination here. When an object is closed, it is perfectly operational and effective when leaving the factory or the makers’ shops. Yet after this period of freshness, it gets old even without being used by a decaying process. The closed object becomes outdated and dull, not because of its wear, but because “its closure has made it lose touch with current reality, with the actuality that has produced it” (Simondon, 2014, p. 401, my translation). On the contrary, what he calls an open object is one that can be constantly actualized by the user, who can adapt her or his skilled gestures to repair or intervene the object in such way that its technical cohesion is maintained. The open object remains engaged to the gestures of the user, who knows his or her way around it, to the point of being able to fix it. It remains ‘alive’ in a sense, thanks to its ‘concreteness’. Even if we must replace or improve its parts, the instrument holds its integrity thanks to its very milieu. For instance, ‘decorative instruments’ can ‘open up’ the realms of marquetry, inlay, ornamentation, use of materials, and so forth; but ‘close down’ their sound quality. One could liken Simondon’s idea of concretization to what other authors (Ernst Cassirer, Ignace Meyerson, or Jean-Pierre Vernant) meant by an ‘objectivation process’. This has little to do with ‘objectivity’, but rather with the process through which form gains its value-specificity.

  71. 71.

    Godwin (1995).

  72. 72.

    Herder (2002). Also, see Rosenthal (2011) for a fuller development of a similar thesis (not directly related to Herder’s).

  73. 73.

    Cassirer (2013a, p. 328, emphases in the original).

  74. 74.

    Polanyi and Prosch (1975, p. 85).

  75. 75.

    This is not fundamentally different from the distinction between readiness-to-hand [Zuhandenheit] and present-at-hand [Vorhandenheit] that came to be relevant to Heidegger’s (1962) study of our relationship with techniques and our encounter with things, more generally.

  76. 76.

    See Lassègue (2012), Simondon (2012).

  77. 77.

    Lassègue (2012, p. 141).

  78. 78.

    In Humboldt’s (2000) case, the distinction serves as a tool to assert the mutability of language (in terms of energeia), which shows itself over a longer idiomatic life span, where it refuses to be reduced to a ready-made system that is simply implemented by its users. This is just one of the consequences of approaching speech/language forms from their potentialities and instabilities.

  79. 79.

    Cassirer (2013b, p. 276, added brackets).

  80. 80.

    Lassègue (2012, p. 142).

  81. 81.

    Cassirer (2013b, p. 308).

  82. 82.

    “By Natura naturans, we understand a being that we can conceive clearly and distinctly through itself, and without needing anything else beside itself (like all the attributes which we have so far described), that is, God. The Thomists understand God by it, but their Natura naturans was a being (so they called it) beyond all substances.

    The Natura naturata we shall divide into two; a general, and a particular. The general consists of all the modes which depend immediately of God […] the particular consists of all the particular things that are produced by the general mode. So that the Natura naturata requires some substance in order to be well understood. […]

    Now, as regards to the general Natura naturata, or the modes, or creations which depend on, or have been created by God immediately, of these we know no more than two, namely, motion in matter, and the understanding in the thinking thing. These, then, we say, have been from all eternity, and to all eternity will remain inmutable. A work truly as great as the greatness of the workmaster. […]

    [S]ince it [Motion] more properly belongs to a treatise on Natural Science rather than here, we shall not consider in this place, but we shall only say this about it, that it is a Son, Product, or Effect created immediately by God.” Spinoza (1910, pp. 56–57).

  83. 83.

    Cassirer (1991).

References

  • Aftalion, A. (1913). Les crises périodiques de surproduction. Rivière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (1891). Handbook of psychology - Feeling and will. Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellow, A. (1970). The illustrated history of the guitar. Franco Colombo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. (1993). The sound of the violin. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 15(1), 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick, E. K. (1970). The riddle of the tortoise and the lyre. Music & Letters, 51(4), 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). La connaissance par corps. In Méditations Pascaliennes. Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bücher, K. (1896). Arbeit und Rhythmus. Bei S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buob, B. (2013). De l’adresse. Remarques sur l’esthétique des gestes du luthier. Gradhiva, 17, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1935). El juego y su significado. Revista de Occidente. (Original work published, 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1991). Perception des choses et perception de l’expression. In Logique des sciences de la culture. Editions du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (2013a). Mythic, aesthetic and theoretical space. In The Wahrburg years (1919-1933). Essays on language, art, myth and technology. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (2013b). Form and technology. In The Wahrburg years (1919-1933). Essays on language, art, myth and technology. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. C. (1913). Prose rhythm in English. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias Orozco, S. (1610). Emblemas morales. Luis Sánchez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozyński, L. (1911). Atmungs- und Pulssymptome Rhythmischer Gefhüle. Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre, L. (1935). Réflexions sur l’histoire des techniques. Annales d’Histoire Économique et Sociale, 36, 531–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (2003). La science en tant qu’art. In La science en tant qu’art. Albin Michel. (Original conference given in 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogerty, E. (1937). Rhythm. George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghyka, M. (1931). Le nombre d’or. Rite et rythmes pythagoriciens dans le développement de la civilisation occidentale. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghyka, M. (1938). Essai sur le rythme. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, J. (Ed.). (1993). The harmony of the spheres: A sourcebook of the pythagorean tradition in music. Inner Traditions International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, J. (1995). Harmonies of heaven and earth. Inner Traditions International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J. W. (1983). Goethe: The collected works. Vol. 12. Scientific studies. Suhrkamp Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2002). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herder, J. G. (2002). Sculpture: Some observations on shape and form in Pygmalion’s creative dream. The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1778).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2001). Beyond art and technology. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 17–31). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. A brief history. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art, and architecture. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L. (1989). The presence of myth. The Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komlosy, A. (2014). Arbeit. Eine globalhistorische Perspektive. 13. bis 21. Jahrhundert. Promedia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, F. (1913). Magical factors in the first development of human labor. American Journal of Psychology, 24, 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassègue, J. (2012). Technical activity as a symbolic form; comparing money and language. In A. S. Hoel & I. Folkvord (Eds.), Ernst Cassirer on form and technology: Contemporary readings (pp. 139–160). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V., & Anstruther-Thomson, C. (1912). Beauty & ugliness and other studies in psychological aesthetics. John Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1965). Le geste et la parole II : La mémoire et les rythmes. Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1923). Los fundamentos de la estética. Daniel Jorro. (Original work published, 1903-1906).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeve, S., Guchet, X., & Bensaude Vincent, B. (Eds.). (2018). French philosophy of technology. Classical readings and contemporary approaches. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loopuyt, M. (2018). Le oud Nahhât. Luth mythique de Damas. Philarmonie de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbe, K. (1904). Über den Rhythmus der Prosa. Proceedings of the 1st German Conference on Experimental Psychology. De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1921). L’expression obligatoire des sentiments (rituels oraux funéraires australiens). Journal de Psychologie, 18, 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2009). Les techniques du corps. In Sociologie et anthropologie (pp. 265–386). PUF. (Original work published, 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). L’Œil et l’esprit. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, A. (1964). The anthropology of music. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, P. (2015). Marcel Mauss retrouvé: Origines de l’anthropologie du rhythme. Rhuthmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, P. (2018a). Elements of rhythmology I. Antiquity. Rhuthmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, P. (2018b). Elements of rhythmology II. From the renaissance to the 19th century. Rhuthmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (2000). On intellectual craftsmanship. In The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press. (Original work published, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mopsik, C. (1999). Le Zohar. Cantique des Cantiques (translation from aramaic and hebrew, commentaries and introduction by C. Mopsik). Verdier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niska, J. (1821). De rythmo ut poëseos ita et eloquentuiæ forma pulcra. Upsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálsson. (1994). Enskilment at sea. Man, New Series, 29(4), 901–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. The Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racy, A. J. (2003). Making music in the Arab world. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. (1992). Music as motion: A synopsis of Alexander Truslit’s (1938) “Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik”. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-111/112, 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson. (2017). The invisible line: When craft becomes art. Hal Leonard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, V. (2011). Synésthesie en mode majeur. Une introduction. Intellectica, 55(1), 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckmich, C. (1913a). A bibliography of rhythm. The American Journal of Psychology, 24, 508–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckmich, C. (1913b). The role of kinaesthesis in the perception of rhythm. The American Journal of Psychology, 24(3), 305–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, G. (1976). Prólogo al deseoso de tañer. In Instrucción de música sobre la guitarra española, y método de sus primeros rudimentos, hasta tañerla con destreza. Herederos de Diego Dormer. (Original work published, 1697).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigaut, F. (1991). L’apprentissage vu par les ethnologues: Un stéréotype ? In D. Chevallier (dir.) Savoir faire et pouvoir transmettre: Transmission des savoir-faire et des techniques. Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigaut, F. (1994). Technology. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology (pp. 420–459). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigaut, F. (2003/2006). La formule de Mauss. Techniques & Culture (en ligne), 40, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigaut, F. (2006). Le savoir des couteaux. In Dire le savoir-faire: Gestes, techniques et objects. cahiers d’anthropologie sociale, 1 (pp. 133–139). L’Herne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2012). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier. (Original work published, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2014). Sur la technique. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A. (2002). A history of the lute from antiquity to the renaissance. The Lute Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1910). Short treatise on God, man and his well-being. Adam and Charles Black. (Original work published 1660).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spuybroek, L. (2016). The sympathy of things: Ruskin and the ecology of design. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spuybroek, L. (2017). Gothic ontology and sympathy: Moving away from the fold. In S. Van Tuinen (Ed.), Speculative art histories (pp. 131–162). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudo, P. T. (1998). Zen guitar. Fireside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. (2004). The arts and crafts companion. Bulfinch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J. R. R. (1977). The silmarillion. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Humboldt, W. (2000). Sur le caractère national des langues et autres écrits sur le langage. Editions du Seuil. (Original work published 1836).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfflin, H. (1886). Prolegomena zu einer Psychologie der Architektur. Kgl. Hof- & Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von Dr. C. Wolf & Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yupanqui, A. (2013). Atahualpa Yupanqui nos enseña el significado de una guitarra para un músico. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siPWW-udzLM

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rojas, P. (2021). Technical Rhythms and Harmonies. In: Reprising Craftsmanship. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80132-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics