Abstract
The Police Department in any city uses a wide range of enforcement to ensure public safety and traffic stops are one such tool. During this process, racial disparities in policing in the United States is not very uncommon. This has created both social and ethical concerns among people. As a result researchers in different domains have taken interest in connecting different pieces of information and finding a possible solution to these issues. In this paper, we have addressed the societal bias through the lens of data science focusing on how police stops are made and which groups of people are targeted most often. The analysis is done on major cities of California focusing on the different factors that might create discrimination in police stops. We also used two popularly known statistical analysis benchmark test and veil of darkness to look into racial profiling. Based on our analysis, it was clear that the Black drivers were stopped between 2.5 to 3.7 times more than white drivers and Hispanic drivers were stopped between 0.968 to 1.39 times more than white drivers (between 2014 and 2017 respectively).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ayres, I.: Outcome tests of racial disparities in police practices. Just. Res. Policy 4(1–2), 131–142 (2002)
Baumgartner, F.R., Epp, D.A., Shoub, K., Love, B.: Targeting young men of color for search and arrest during traffic stops: evidence from North Carolina, 2002–2013. Polit. Groups Ident. 5(1), 107–131 (2017)
Becker, G.S.: The Economics of Discrimination. University of Chicago Press (2010)
Chohlas-Wood, A., Goel, S., Shoemaker, A., Shroff, R.: An analysis of the metropolitan nashville police department’s traffic stop practices. Technical report, Stanford Computational Policy Lab (2018)
Davis, E., Whyde, A., Langton, L.: Contacts between police and the public (2015)
Goel, S., Perelman, M., Shroff, R., Sklansky, D.A.: Combatting police discrimination in the age of big data. New Crim. Law Rev. 20(2), 181–232 (2017)
Goel, S., Rao, J.M., Shroff, R., et al.: Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York city’s stop-and-frisk policy. Ann. Appl. Stat. 10(1), 365–394 (2016)
Grogger, J., Ridgeway, G.: Testing for racial profiling in traffic stops from behind a veil of darkness. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101(475), 878–887 (2006)
Horrace, W.C., Rohlin, S.M.: How dark is dark? Bright lights, big city, racial profiling. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98(2), 226–232 (2016)
Knowles, J., Persico, N., Todd, P.: Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: theory and evidence. J. Polit. Econ. 109(1), 203–229 (2001)
Liederbach, J., Trulson, C.R., Fritsch, E.J., Caeti, T.J., Taylor, R.W.: Racial profiling and the political demand for data: a pilot study designed to improve methodologies in Texas. Crim. Just. Rev. 32(2), 101–120 (2007)
Maitreyi, A.: Data for change: a statistical analysis of police stops, searches, handcuffings, and arrests in Oakland, Calif., 2013–2014. Stanford University, SPARQ: Social Psychological Answers to Real-World Questions (2016)
Pierson, E., et al.: A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the united states. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1–10 (2020)
Voigta, R., et al.: Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. PNAS 114(25), 6521–6526 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Manna, S., Bunyard, S. (2021). Analyzing Societal Bias of California Police Stops Through Lens of Data Science. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Computing. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 284. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80126-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80126-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80125-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80126-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)