Skip to main content

Open-Source Medical Devices: Concept, Trends, and Challenges Toward Equitable Healthcare Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering Open-Source Medical Devices

Abstract

Medical technology has transformed the practice of medicine and patient care, with a wide set of relevant breakthroughs achieved during the last decades. However, in many cases, medical technology is developed in secrecy, and patients’ or medical professionals’ needs are considered as a minor part of the decision-making process, instead of being driven by relevant emergent social needs. In contrast with the biomedical industry, many product fields are now involving stakeholders and future users, since the beginning of the product development process, embracing the new paradigm of “open innovation” and showing interesting results in terms of improved performance, safety, and costs, among others. However, healthcare industry is still reluctant to taking advantage of the enormous potentials of open-source and collaborative approach toward a social development of medical devices. In order to highlight the potentials of open-source and collaborative engineering and design approaches for the future of biomedical industry and to help with its transformation, this chapter is focused on: (1) adequately defining the concept of open-source medical device (OSMD) and its boundaries, (2) presenting pioneering cases of success in the OSMD field and discussing their relevance, and (3) introducing the UBORA e-infrastructure and community, as key initiative in the field. This chapter serves also as an introduction to the whole handbook and to the more relevant concepts employed along this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahluwalia, C., De Maria, A., & Lantada, D. (2018). The Kahawa Declaration: A manifesto for the democratization of medical technology. Global Health Innovation, 1(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. P., Da Silva, H. P., Lourenco, A., & Fred, A. L. N. (2006). BITalino: A biosignal system acquisition based on Arduino. Proceeding of the 6th Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices (BIODEVICES), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcarisi, L., Di Pietro, L., Carbonaro, N., Tognetti, A., Ahluwalia, A., & De Maria, C. (2019). Palpreast: A new wearable device for breast self-examination. Applied Sciences, 9, 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atala, A., & Joo, J. J. (2015). Essentials of biofabrication and translation. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debian project. Debian Social Contract (version 1.1 ratified on April 26, 2004). Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html.

  • De Maria, C., Di Pietro, L., Lantada, A. D., Madete, J., Makobore, P. N., Mridha, M., … Ahluwalia, A. (2018). Safe innovation: On medical device legislation in Europe and Africa. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Maria, C., Di Pietro, L., Ravizza, A., Diaz Lantada, A., & Ahluwalia, A. (2020). Open source medical devices. In E. Iadanza (Ed.), Clinical engineering handbook. Elsevier., ISBN: 9780128134672.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maria, C., Mazzei, D., & Ahluwalia, A. (2015). Improving African health care through open source Biomedical Engineering. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 7(1), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, T. S. (2011). Biomedical engineering education in developing countries: Research synthesis. IEEE-EMBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • e-NABLE Community. Enabling the future: A passionate network of volunteers using 3D printing to give the World a helping hand. Online, last access to web in May 2019. http://enablingthefuture.org.

  • European Society of Radiology (ESR). (2015). Medical imaging in personalised medicine: A white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights into Imaging, 6(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasterholdt, I., Lee, A., Kidholm, K., Yderstraede, K. B., & Pedersen, K. M. (2018). A qualitative exploration of early assessment of innovative medical technologies. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, J., Di Pietro, L., & De Maria, C. (2017). Open-source automated external defibrillator. HardwareX, 2, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K., Dinnes, J., Chuchu, N., Takwoingi, Y., Bayliss, S. E., Matin, R. N., ... & Deeks, J. J. (2020). Algorithm based smartphone apps to assess risk of skin cancer in adults: Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, N., Bow, J. K., & Pearce, J. M. (2018). Economic potential for distributed manufacturing of adaptive aids for arthritis patients in the U.S. Geriatrics, 3(4), 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., & Bernard, A. (2017). An overview of knowledge sharing in new product development. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(5–8), 1545–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma Cardio Soft S.r.l. Open source ECG. Online, last access to web in May 2019. http://www.gammacardiosoft.it/openecg/.

  • Ghezzi, T. L., & Corleta, O. C. (2016). 30 years of robotic surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 40(10), 2550–2557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenfeld. (2005). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop-from personal computers to personal fabrication. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassianos, A. P., Emery, J. D., Murchie, P., & Walter, F. M. (2015). Smartphone applications for melanoma detection by community, patient and generalist clinician users: A review. British Journal of Dermatology, 172, 1507–1518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidnezhad, A., Kabootarizadeh, L., & Hoseini, S. M. (2019). The effects of smartphone applications on patients self-care with hypertension: A systematic review study. Acta Informatica Medica, 27(4), 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, R., Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. (2014). Principles of tissue engineering (4th ed.). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L., Cusumano, M., & Shirky, C. (2005). Perspectives on free and open source software. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkin, R. A. (2007a). Design of health care technologies for the developing world. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 9, 567–587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malkin, R. A. (2007b). Barriers for medical devices for the developing world. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 4(6), 759–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT’s SANA project. (2020). Medical diagnostics over mobile phones. SANA site in GitHub. https://github.com/sanamobile.

  • Moroni, L., Boland, T., Burdick, J. A., De Maria, C., Derby, B., Forgacs, G., … Mota, C. (2018). Biofabrication: A guide to technology and terminology. Trends in biotechnology, 36(4), 384–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. K., & Jee, K. S. (2014). Concurrent knowledge sharing and its importance in product development. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14, 2978–2985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, G., Eslambolchilar, P., & Thimbleby, H. (2016). Open-source hardware for medical devices. BMJ Innovations, 2, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, P., et al. Patient innovation: Sharing solutions, improving lifes. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://patient-innovation.com.

  • Open Bionics. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://openbionics.com/.

  • Open Prosthetics. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://openprosthetics.org/.

  • Open source initiative. Open source definition. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://opensource.org/docs/definition.php.

  • Open source hardware association. Open source hardware definition. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://www.oshwa.org/definition/.

  • Pearce, J. M. (2014a). Open-source lab: How to build your own hardware and reduce research costs. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. M. (2014b). Laboratory equipment. Cut costs with open-source hardware. Nature (Correspondence), 505, 618.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. M. (2017). Emerging business models for open source hardware. Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savonen, B. J., Gershenson, J., Pearce, J. M., & Bow, J. K. (2019). Open-source three dimensional printable infant clubfoot brace. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000257

  • UBORA: Euro-African Open Biomedical Engineering Innovation e-platform for Innovation through Education. Online, as of January 2020. https://platform.ubora-biomedical.org/.

  • United Nations General Assembly: Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, on 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.

  • Vlassi, M., Mavraganis, V., & Asvestas, P. (2017). A software platform for the analysis of dermatology images. Journal of Physics, Conference Series, 937, 012011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M. D., et al. (2016). Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018., 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010a). Medical devices: Managing the mismatch: An outcome of the priority medical devices project. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010b). Barriers to innovation in the field of medical devices (Background paper 6). World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witchurch, A. Examples of open source medical devices. Protocentral site in GitHub. Online, last access to web in May 2019. https://github.com/Protocentral/.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 731053, UBORA: Euro-African Open Biomedical Engineering e-Platform for Innovation through Education (topic: INFRASUPP-03-2016-Support to policies and international cooperation for e-infrastructures).

figure a
figure b

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmelo De Maria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Maria, C., Díaz Lantada, A., Di Pietro, L., Ravizza, A., Ahluwalia, A. (2022). Open-Source Medical Devices: Concept, Trends, and Challenges Toward Equitable Healthcare Technology. In: Ahluwalia, A., De Maria, C., Díaz Lantada, A. (eds) Engineering Open-Source Medical Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79363-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics