Skip to main content

Agility Driven Learning for Educational Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (CAiSE 2021)

Abstract

Agility as a capability to rapidly respond to changes and to reduce uncertainty in an increment-based way is also critically important in Educational Organizations, such as Colleges, Universities, online learning platforms, and educational service providers. Nowadays, people can easily get access to educational courses, and the ability to provide a personalized educational track and change it depending on an agile business context is critically important. The user needs to identify the target specialization or job and get the shortest path with the list of recommended courses and alternatives. This paper summarizes the key ideas relating to methodological principles and practical tools of agility that can be applicable to educational organizations and suggests the model that builds a unique educational path, based on users behavior, data on existing courses, and personal information. The suggested model uses gamification techniques to boost short-term motivation and allows customizing and rebuilding the educational track, also considering churn rate and the educational progress of the user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Accenture: It’s learning. Just not as we know it: how to accelerate skills acquisition in the age of intelligent technologies. Accenture (2018). https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/Thought-Leadership-Assets/PDF/Accenture-Education-and-Technology-Skills-Research.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2021

  2. Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., Preiss, K.: Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing. Int. J. Technol. Mang. 8(1–2), 18–38 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernardes, E.S., Hanna, M.D.: A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature: toward a conceptual definition of customer responsiveness. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 29(1), 30–52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910925352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alfonso, M.I., Botia, A.: An iterative and agile process model for teaching software engineering. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), pp. 9–16 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2005.5

  5. Morien, R.: Pedagogical agility and agile methodologies in computer system development education. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradig., 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAIP.2018.092943

  6. Duvall, S., Hutchings, D., Kleckner, M.: Changing perceptions of discrete mathematics through Scrum-based course management practices. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 33(2), 182–189 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart, J.C., DeCusatis, C.S., Kidder, K., Massi, J.R., Anne, K.M.: Evaluating agile principles in active and cooperative learning. In: Proceedings of Student-Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University, B3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tesar, M., Sieber, S.: Managing blended learning scenarios by using agile e-learning development. In: 2010 Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Learning, vol. 2, pp. 125–129 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parsons, D., MacCallum, K.: Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning; Bringing Methodologies from industry to the Classroom. Springer, Singapore (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chun, A.H.W.: The agile teaching/learning methodology and its e-learning platform. In: Liu, W., Shi, Y., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3143, pp. 11–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanij, T., Grundy, J.: Adapting teaching of a software engineering service course due to COVID-19. In: 2020 IEEE 32nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Munich, Germany, pp. 1–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET49119.2020.9206204

  12. Agrawal, S., Smet, A.D., Poplawski, P., Reich, A.: Beyond hiring: How companies are reskilling to address talent gaps: survey. McKinsey & Company, 20 February 2020. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/beyond-hiring-how-companies-are-reskilling-to-address-talent-gaps. Accessed 10 Dec 2020

  13. Ahmed, F., Capretz, L.F., Campbell, P.: Evaluating the demand for soft skills in software development. IT Prof. 14(1), 44–49 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daneva, M., Wang, C., Hoener, P.: What the job market wants from requirements engineers? An empirical analysis of online job ads from the Netherlands. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 448-453 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2017.60

  15. Yusuf, Y.Y., Sarhadi, M., Gunasekaran, A.: Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62(1), 33–43 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sánchez Carracedo, F., et al.: Competency maps: an effective model to integrate professional competencies across a STEM curriculum. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 27(5), 448–468 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9735-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perera, S., Babatunde, S., Zhou, L., Pearson, J., Ekundayo, D.: Competency mapping framework for regulating professionally oriented degree programmes in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 42(12) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1143926

  18. Gugnany, A., Ponnalagy, K., Kuma, V.: Generating unified candidate skill graph for career path recommendation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2018.00054

  19. Zhilina, E.V.: Using binary logistic regression to assess the quality of an adaptive test. Journal Vestnik TSU â„– 334, Russia, Tomsk (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pyke, S.W., Sheridan, P.: Logistic regression analysis of graduate student retention. Can. J. High. Educ. 23, 44–64 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jia, Y., Xu, B., Karanam, Y., Voida, S.: Personality-targeted gamification: a survey study on personality traits and motivational affordances. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2016. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858515

  22. Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T.: The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. In: 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2014) https://doi.org/10.1109/latice.2014.10

  23. Thomas, H.C., Charles, I.L., Ronald, L.R., Clifford, S.: Algorithms: Construction and Analysis = Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edn. Williams, Moscow (2006). S. 1296, ISBN 0-07-013151-1

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, K., Frick, T.: Changes in student motivation during online learning. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 44(1), 1–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dichev, C., Dicheva, D.: Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 14(1), 1–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamary, J., Tuunanen, J.: Player types: a meta-synthesis. Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc. 1(2), 29–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar, J.: Gamification at work: designing engaging business software. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 528–537. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohavi, R., Longbotham, R.: Online controlled experiments and A/B testing. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G.I. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, pp. 922–929. Springer, Boston (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_891

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma, V., Dogra, J.: Study of new paradigm shift towards online learning and analysis of E-management education. Int. J. Mark. Manag. Res. (IJMMR) 3(1) (2012). ISSN 2229-6883

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Pesotskaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Avdoshin, S., Pesotskaya, E., Kuruppuge, D., Strashnova, A. (2021). Agility Driven Learning for Educational Organizations. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Rinderle-Ma, S. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. CAiSE 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79021-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79022-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics